446
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Identifying the Internet of Things (IoT) implementation benefits for sustainable construction project

Pages 700-766 | Received 12 Feb 2024, Accepted 09 Jun 2024, Published online: 01 Jul 2024

ABSTRACT

Understanding the implementation of the Internet of Things (IoT) in sustainable construction projects. Implementing the IoT in sustainable construction schemes can offer many benefits, including resource management, remote control and monitoring, improving safety, optimizing building performance and data-driven decision-making. This research presents a unique effort to enhance our comprehension of IoT implementation in such projects. We analyzed 55 studies using a systematic approach to literature selection and filtration, using theoretical models for Internet of Things (IoT) implementation to study the sustainability of construction industries. The results revealed that monitoring constituted 9 (16.4%), machine/equipment control 2 (3.6%), safety in construction 5 (9.1%), water management 4 (7.3%), 4IR 2 (3.6%), BIM 5 (9.1%), green IoT 5 (9.1%), prefabricated design 2 (3.6%), IoT adoption level 6 (10.9%), and other aspects accounted for 15 (27.3%). The primary areas of IoT application in the construction industry include BIM, remote application monitoring, construction management, repair and equipment services, construction implements, and tracking equipment. Notably, there is a lack of research awareness regarding the potential integration of IoT and BIM by construction companies. Despite numerous studies on IoT adoption, limited literature addresses the challenges and awareness of how IoT tools impact implementation in the building industry. Our review proposes a framework for implementing sustainable construction projects to address this gap. However, further investigation is required to analyze potential security threats associated with IoT in a smart city setting, explore promising countermeasures, and delve into open research issues.

Introduction

The traditional construction method (on-site) is debatably time-consuming, liable to accidents, inefficient, and significantly overburdens automation in construction. It is also associated with environmental and air pollution. In some underdeveloped nations, large construction projects have caused severe environmental and health consequences associated with poor social welfare among people [Citation1–3]. However, off-site construction steers in a new construction method that adopts principles of lean construction, reducing waste generation and enhancing quick delivery of projects through improved quality, safety and client satisfaction by turning the building process away from a physical project site to a more automated construction environment [Citation1,Citation4]. Automated construction-based prefabrication (or production) connotes some forms of automation that move particular phases of construction project development from the physical project site to the off-site industrial unit [Citation5–7]. The different construction components are produced in a factory environment and hauled to the leading site for on-site construction.

Notwithstanding the well-credited paybacks of the off-site building methods and their supposed drive for automation in construction, the speed at which this approach is adopted is progressively slow, particularly in developing countries. Poor supply chain management for off-site building systems initiates delayed precast components delivery, project time and cost overrun and monotonous management operations [Citation1,Citation8,Citation9]. Therefore, the success of the off-site project construction procedure is primarily contingent on the resourceful and automated management of supply chains. Although managing international business markets for off-site construction has generated powerful competitive business atmospheres that drive the business flow via automated supply chains, modern supply chains are multifarious, vulnerable and expensive to manage [Citation1,Citation10,Citation11]. The off-site construction industry needs interconnected supply chain systems that will offer improved information integration, channels of communication, and industry processes in cyberspace – the survival of off-site construction companies in these intricate commercial atmospheres [Citation12]. Wang et al. [Citation13] argued that the supply chains must be more structurally resilient and flexible to adjust to the critical variations in the market by being reliable, responsive resilient and building an operational business with clients, suppliers and end users, which can be achieved through IoT [Citation14,Citation15].

The Internet of Things (IoT) remains one of the significant enablers and drivers that essentially stimulate efficient supply chain management [Citation16,Citation17]. Using IoT, supply chains can effectively manage business weaknesses and threats. Apart from that, various global processes in companies, including vendors, clients, and end users, can be incorporated by procuring and conveying data and improving operational communication [Citation18,Citation19]. The incorporation enhances decent decision-making and eventually increases the supply chain performance. Paradoxically, the availability of data has never been a critical problem.

Therefore, construction projects in future will require Industry 4.0 implementation and IoT technologies [Citation20]. However, the building sector has lagged behind other sectors in applying these tools and faces substantial challenges. The construction industry is lagging in applying innovative new technologies in construction projects [Citation21,Citation22].

Therefore, an extensive literature review is required to identify the essential paradigms and factors which can be tested cautiously. For instance, Maqbool et al. assessed a study on evolving industry 4.0 and IoT tools in the building sector regarding their benefits, sustainability, and challenges in implementation. Results indicated that these technologies could add sustainable policy requisites to tendering, with the most pressing tool being the lack of skills and talent in applying IoT tools and industry 4.0. Hence, an attempt was made to model the constraints of IoT on supply chain management in construction projects [Citation1]. Notwithstanding tenacious calls for cleaner production and increased building process automation, the adoption of IoT in construction business supply chain management has been downcast due to different constraints. Kazmi and Sodangi [Citation1] methodologically identified and ranked the critical factors hindering the IoT application in construction. The lack of a clear strategy for controlling IoT applications in managing the supply chain appeared to be the foremost barrier to IoT implementation in the construction industry.

However, the lack of technologies for obtaining and processing large amounts of data and the frustrating delay between the collection of data-making decisions have been persistently impacting the performance of the supply chain. Therefore, IoT seeks to curtail these delays by guaranteeing that supply chains react to vagaries in real time [Citation23–25]. Further, it seeks to streamline the remote management of supply chain processes, enhance coordination among agents and improve data accuracy for up-to-date decision-making. Consequently, this review attempts to answer why Internet of Things (IoT) implementation is essential for sustainable construction. Thus, this review will increase our understanding of IoT technologies’ roles in the construction business. IoT tools are strategic for tracking project site apparatuses, machines and equipment. IoT technologies help to increase efficiency and cut operation costs by facilitating accurate monitoring. Instant location and retrieval of tools are expedited by IoT technologies, minimizing resources and time spent on misplaced items tracking [Citation26,Citation27].

Why is it essential to study IoT implementation for sustainable construction projects?

The application of IoT in construction projects has been increasing since technology can offer full support to construction projects in realizing significant project delivery efficiency. Specifically, IoT applications in construction projects offer the following benefits.

  1. Wearables are some of the most common IoT tools for many people and one of the most obliging in construction. Over 25% of fatalities occur in the construction industry [Citation28,Citation29]. However, wearables can aid by notifying employees of harmful circumstances. Sensors in configured helmets can monitor body temperature and heart rates to realize when workers are at risk of overexertion and alert them to a break [Citation30,Citation31]. Thus, proximity sensors can notify employees when they approach a fall exposure or heavy machinery, averting mishaps.

  2. Safety Sensors: On-vehicle or on-site safety sensors are an analogous IoT application in construction with substantial benefits [Citation32,Citation33]. Just as wearables offer valuable safety data concerning employees, these devices can do the same for the entire work site. Estimates revealed that 75% of stuck-by-accidents comprise heavy-duty machinery. IoT sensors on this device can notify operators or stop the machine automatically if they get closer to another operator to avert mishaps [Citation34,Citation35].

  3. Monitoring of Materials: The IoT tolls can also be used to monitor materials. Concrete sensors are among the leading examples [Citation36,Citation37]. After placing joined sensors in concrete, construction crews can inspect the curing process or check if it requires repairs. Since concrete curing can vary with elements like humidity and temperature, there is no definite timeline for completion [Citation38].

  4. Prevention of theft: Prevention of Theft is another fast-growing aspect of IoT applications in construction [Citation39,Citation40]. Project sites are vital targets of thieves, owing to their costly tools and comparatively low security. As the cost of building materials increases, this theft could increase, but IoT gadgets can aid in fitting theft [Citation41,Citation42]. Coupled drones can patrol project sites without requiring a human security arrangement.

  5. Waste management: Construction crews apply IoT tools to track and reduce waste. Demolition and construction operations generated about 600 million tons in 2018 without including wasted energy and other fuel [Citation43,Citation44]. IoT tracking offers an understanding of the industry’s need to reduce waste. Construction crews can consequently adjust as required, reducing their consumption of fuel.

Thus, answers provided concerning the question above highlight our novel attempt to address the need for further research to improve our understanding of the critical barriers to IoT implementation and identify the benefits of IoT implementation for sustainable construction projects. These are essential since IoT is a transformative concept where every day focus objects link to the Internet to receive and share data, affecting different industries worldwide seamlessly.

Previous studies on IoT implementation for sustainable construction projects indicated a considerable increase in IoT applications in the construction sector [Citation21,Citation45–48]. Emerging 4IR and IoT tools in the construction industry concerning benefits, implementation challenges and sustainability were analyzed by Maqbool et al. [Citation21]. Results revealed that smart building was the most popular 4IR tool in the construction industry. A major benefit of these tools is that they add sustainable policy requirements to contracts, with the most pressing tool being the lack of skills and talent in 4IR and IoT applications. Trends and patterns of IoT research concerning the future applications in the construction industry showed that the major impact of IoT implementation in the construction industry comprised instant reporting, full process control, data flare-up leading to deep data analytics, strict interoperability, data security and privacy, flexible policy structures, suitable contracts models and planning. IoT and blockchain-based smart construction for sustainability of prefabricated housing construction by Li et al. [Citation47] developed a platform-based smart construction service network of prefabricated buildings. IoT and blockchain enhance safe data transmission and full-quality supervision. Real-time monitoring schedule of quality, cost and security in the prefabricated building enhanced sustainability innovation and the practical application of incorporated supply chain management was seamless.

Despite significant research output on IoT applications and construction projects’ sustainability, numerous gaps still need to be addressed. These comprised standardization and interoperability, data privacy and security, optimizing energy efficiency, environmental impact and lifecycle assessment, cost-effectiveness and scalability, user adoption and acceptance and incorporation with BIM. Although IoT tools provide immense potential for collecting data and computerization in building projects, there is a dearth of standardization and interoperability between various IoT platforms and maneuvers. Research should establish standards that allow seamless incorporation of different IoT solutions to maximize their advantages in construction sustainability. Similarly, with the increase in IoT devices gathering vast amounts of data on construction sites, warranting the privacy and security of data remains a considerable concern. Thus, research is needed to establish strong privacy protocols and security measures to protect sensitive data gathered by IoT maneuvers. Though IoT contributes to energy saving in building projects by improving resource use and energy consumption monitoring, there is a need for more research on creating advanced algorithms and forecasting models to enhance energy use. These comprised real-time monitoring and energy control systems in construction and project sites.

The objective of sustainable construction projects is to minimize environmental impact throughout the lifecycle of a building, from building to operation and flattening. Thus, research is required to assess how IoT tools can enable comprehensive lifecycle assessments and improve the decision-making process to lessen environmental impact successfully. Many IoT solutions face issues related to cost-effectiveness and scalability. Research developing scalable IoT cost-effectiveness and architectures that can be used across different building projects, irrespective of their scale or budget limitations. Successful adoption of IoT in sustainable building projects depends largely on user adoption and acceptance. Thus, factors affecting the adoption and acceptance of IoT technologies among construction participants, such as architects, contractors, engineers and occupants, establish procedures to enhance their implementation.

Additionally, there is a need to explore ways to incorporate IoT tools with BIM systems to improve data interoperability, enhance project coordination, and facilitate the policy-making process for sustainable building projects. Hence, addressing these research gaps will advance our knowledge concerning the possible benefits of IoT in sustainable building and aid in overcoming the barriers and challenges to its broader adoption in the sector. Against this background, this study aims to identify IoT implementation benefits for sustainable construction projects.

Methods

The theoretical models for Internet of Things (IoT) implementation are extensively used to study the sustainability of construction industries. The model design is embraced since studying sustainable construction projects is a thought-provoking topic. This is due to the challenges construction industries and authorities face in maintaining and managing buildings sustainably (). The preliminary review approach has been adopted from previous studies [Citation49,Citation50]. The guiding study interrogation for this analysis is: Why is it essential to study IoT implementation for sustainable construction projects? Databases including Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, ERIC, JSTOR and IEEE were explored on 01/019/2023 using to formulate search terms and literature documentation as illustrated in . The search was limited to articles published in English and available from 2007 to 2023 ().

Figure 1a. Hypothetical framework for IoT implementation for a sustainable construction project.

Figure 1a. Hypothetical framework for IoT implementation for a sustainable construction project.

Figure 1b. Research methodology.

Figure 1b. Research methodology.

Table 1. Search terms are used to query the database and catalog the results.

The Boolean positional operators (‘AND00, OR00. ‘SAME00, WITH00, ‘ADJ00) following Andrade et al. [Citation51] and Wali and Alias [Citation52] were used to explore the literature on IoT implementation for sustainable construction projects, identify and adequately screen the literature. further summarizes the research methodology. It illustrates the various phases of this study, from formulation of research terms and literature documentation, literature selection and inclusion, and classification of literature into different sections. Lastly, a framework for IoT implementation has been proposed.

Choosing a paper needs validation of IoT implementation for sustainable construction projects. Studies on IoT implementation for sustainable construction projects were deemed suitable as long as the IoT implementation was depicted. Consequently, 167,000 prospective papers were spotted, reducing to 916 based on eligibility and accessibility. Finally, fifty-five (55) articles were chosen for this assessment based on the criteria synopsized in . Details of the selected articles are attached as Appendix A.

Figure 2. PRISMA flow chart illustrating literature assortment and enclosure process.

Figure 2. PRISMA flow chart illustrating literature assortment and enclosure process.

The physiognomies of the chosen papers are abridged in (Appendix B) and . Based on the summary, monitoring accounted for 9 (16.4%), Machine/equipment control 2 (3.6%), Safety in Construction 5 (9.1%), Water management 4 (7.3%), 4IR 2 (3.6%), BIM 5 (9.1%), Green IoT 5 (9.1%), Prefabricated Design 2 (3.6%), IoT adoption level 6 (10.9%). It accounted for 15 others (27.3%).

Table 2. Major descriptive faces of selected studies.

Results

Monitoring of construction using the Internet of Things

The major faces of reviewed articles incorporated in this review are summarized in the supplementary material attached to this study (Appendix A). Construction monitoring accounted for 16.4% of Internet of Things (IoT) implementation studies for sustainable construction projects. Oke and Arowoiya [Citation49] assessed IoT application areas within the construction industry using structured questionnaires. Findings revealed that BIM, remote application monitoring, construction management, repair and equipment services, construction implements, and tracking equipment are the foremost areas of IoT application in the building industry. Findings further offered insight into various areas where IoT applies to the building industry. The study also highlights how IoT applications could be enhanced through training, workshops, conferences, and seminars for building experts who want to keep themselves updated about ICT trends, particularly IoT. Thus, the adoption of IoT aids in achieving sustainable construction projects with increased convenience [Citation53]. In the Netherlands, an attempt was made concerning IoT applications to establish a practical approach to evaluating and supervising the IoT’s contribution to sustainability. Wolfert and Isakhanyan [Citation54] provided a case study and illustrated how various subsectors employ monitoring and evaluation techniques in five cases. The study revealed how the technique is validated and applied. Further, the results revealed an overall positive impact of IoT in enhancing sustainability. However, these findings are also partly influenced by other decisive external factors that are difficult to discern in practical conditions.

Consequently, IoT has been considered a reliable tool for construction monitoring. Singh et al. [Citation55] explored the challenges and opportunities of cloud manufacturing, 3D printing and IoT tools in construction projects to realize sustainability. Integrating IoT, CM, and 3DP enables us to digitalize buildings and provide computerized and reliable features to the users. Recent research on 3D printing and cloud development is being examined by classifying them into multiple sections comprising 3D printing (3DP) technology for resource access, 3DP-cloud platform service designs, optimized 3DP service technology configuration, 3DP service evaluation tool and 3D service Monitoring and controlling tools. In addition, the study explored and analyzed the limitations of the available literature and provided significant recommendations, including automation with robotics, 3DP predictive analytics, and 5 G technology-based IoT-based CM for future improvements.

Barriers to the application and safety management of IoT-based technologies can be analyzed to identify how these barriers hinder the use of IoT technologies in construction site safety monitoring (CSSM). Tabatabaee et al. [Citation56] argued that the barriers related to reducing productivity resulting from wearable sensors, the need for continuous monitoring and technical training were most important. While limitations on software and hardware and a dearth of efforts toward standardization, the requirement for proper light for smooth operation and safety hazards comprised the insignificant barriers.The current results only offer new insight to academics. However, they have provided practical guidelines to participants at the forefront by enabling them to understand the critical barriers to adopting IoT technologies in CSSM.

There are many areas of IoT application, including construction monitoring and operation, safety and health management, management of construction logistics, and facility management [Citation57]. Thus, five integration techniques were summarized: BIM tools application API, relational archive, modifying BIM data into a relational achieve using new data outline, establishing new search language, using semantic web tools, and hybrid method. Based on the identified limitations, primary future research paths are recommended, concentrating on web services-based strategies and service-oriented architecture (SOA) patterns for IoT and BIM integration, establishing data integration and management standards, and resolving interoperability cloud computing issues [Citation57]. Consequently, data regarding the construction site can be gathered correctly, efficiently, and in real-time, enabling management to improve decision-making. IoT helps monitor workers, different types of devices and equipment and the required materials to execute construction projects, as illustrated by (Appendix B). Thus, each part of the construction can be monitored using IoT technology. Sarkar et al. [Citation58] suggested developing an IoT platform to establish an integrated cloud-based IoT platform for asset management. Using the platform concerning record keeping amid the component production and transportation process could lessen it by 30%.

Additionally, the cycle time for transporting and casting each precast component can be lessened by 17%. This indicated that there is an improvement in monitoring production efficiency. The findings of the prototype showed that the platform can be applied at project sites for real-time asset management and monitoring. IoT-based environmental monitoring and management enable the introduction a new integrated information system [Citation59]. The application layer offers storage, processing, organizing and management. The literature further indicated a visible, increasing air temperature trend and an apparent rising trend of rainfall. Based on the correlation between environmental indicators, the availability of water resources is the decisive element concerning construction environment monitoring in the area. Monitoring of construction using the Internet of Things involves inserting devices, sensors and networks into different components of the construction activities to collect data in real-time or near real-time. It typically works through sensor deployment, data collection, data transmission, data analysis and processing, notifications and alerts, decision supports, remote control and monitoring, BIM integration and continuous improvement. Generally, monitoring construction using IoT tools provides many benefits, such as improved efficiency, increased safety, cost savings and better project outcomes.

Controlling machines or equipment using IoT technology

Results indicated that machine/equipment control accounted for 3.6% of the articles analyzed. The safe and productive operation of heavy machines requires different proactive measures. As more construction companies apply IoT, some of those actions may require investment in sensor equipment, training operators to analyze data collected, and assisting them in making the best of that improved connectivity. IoT in high-risk environments, health and safety (EHS), were investigated concerning IoT-based applications in high-risk- EHS companies. Thibaud et al. [Citation60] highlighted IoT challenges and offered solutions for high-risk EHS companies. The study presented research challenges and expected trends for IoT in these companies. IoT adoption drivers and supply chain management (SCM) concerning theoretical integration have indicated 14 drivers relating to SCM and IoT, which were further analyzed to determine the most critical drivers [Citation61]. Based on the analysis, business knowledge expertise, effective logistics schemes, and data safety assurance are the leading driving factors. Hence, results could help experts adopt IoT in supply chains to resolve disruptions, vulnerabilities, and risks in the post-pandemic period.

A methodical analysis of the relationship between BIM and IoT in construction companies was also examined, and the potential for incorporating BIM-IoT in the building business was examined [Citation62]. IoT and BIM have been widely used individually in various aspects of building schemes, including construction risk and safety assessment, construction conflict management, construction sustainability, and on-site building monitoring processes [Citation63]. However, there is a dearth of research awareness concerning the possibilities of IoT-BIM integration in building companies. Controlling equipment or machines using IoT tools involves linking physical devices to the Internet to exchange and collect data, allowing remote control and monitoring (). This process comprises sensor integration, connectivity, data processing, remote monitoring, computerization, integration with other systems, and security. Generally, controlling equipment or machines using IoT tools provides many advantages, such as increased efficiency, reduced downtime, predictive maintenance and improved safety. Likewise, it comes with challenges, including ensuring data privacy, scalability, and interoperability.

Safety in construction using IoT technology

Construction safety studies comprised 5 (9.1%) of analyzed articles. Thibaud et al. [Citation60] investigated IoT-based applications in high-risk- EHS companies. Their study highlighted IoT challenges and offered solutions for high-risk EHS companies. The study further presented research challenges and expected trends for IoT in these companies. Professional and user aspects of sustainable computing based on IoT were explored, and the aspects linked to human factors were categorized as critical factors for IoT adoption by the maturity models [Citation64]. The actual integration and expansion of applications based on IoT rely on the capacity to explore the necessary professional profiles and skills critical for adopting IoT schemes and perception of the relevant aspects for users, including legal, privacy and security concerns. The study discovered the professional and user aspects of IoT sustainability.

IoT-enabled uncrewed aerial vehicles for project site inspection can help to present the integration of modern IoT trends with uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs). The usage of IoT-enabled autonomous aerial vehicles to ensure safety and health measures at the site has been emphasized. They summarized the significant shortcomings and limitations of current techniques for the same purpose, comprising optimization matters in planning path, lightweight AI and computer vision algorithms, coordination in IoT communication, and scalability of IoT network. This study will help explore various open research issues further. IoT technology has revolutionized construction companies’ safety management, improving site safety. It enables the achievement of safety via intelligent sensors that gather and convey real-time data associated with the activities of workers, locations, movements, and health status, as indicated by (Appendix B).

illustrates the basic IoT concept: i) sensors gather and convey data to the data storage and collection platform spontaneously; ii) gathered data is kept in a particular format and processed for building the model; iii) valuable data from the model is applied to suitable decision-making to enhance the system and improve the deployment of the sensor, and iv) accurate data is gathered to enhance system performance and avert near-miss incidents on the project site. IoT tools can significantly improve project site safety by offering real-time data collection, monitoring, and analysis. IoT contributes via wearable devices, environmental monitoring, equipment monitoring, site surveillance, safety compliance and training, predictive analytics, and emergency response systems. Remote control and monitoring. IoT technology, leveraging in construction, can enable stake holders to create a safer working environment, lessen accidents, enhance productivity, and eventually save lives. However, it is important to address data privacy, cybersecurity and interoperability concerns to maximize the advantages of implementing IoT.

Water management using IoT in construction projects

Based on the summarized literature in , water management constituted 7.3%. Gloria et al. (2020) have studied IoT and sustainable water management to introduce a novel technique for water system management using a wireless sensor network. The scheme can save real-time data and apply it to determine the precise water quantity. Thus, saving about 34% of water using only temperature inputs is possible. Apart from a detailed system architecture, this study comprises a real-time scenario application. For instance, Sharma et al. [Citation65] analyzed IoT adoption barriers to smart cities’ waste water management and established a framework of IoT implementation barriers in systems of waste water management in smart cities. The study employed hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methods and identified 15 barriers to IoT adoption. Results revealed that the dearth of directions, regulations, and policy guidelines, as well as the absence of internet networks and standardization, are the most influential barriers hindering the development of smart cities, especially in waste management practices. Thus, results will aid policymakers, stakeholders, and authorities in understanding the major IoT barriers impacting water management practices and will certainly assist in undertaking decisions to eradicate these barriers for improved IoT adoption. Perumal et al. [Citation66] proposed a real-time IoT-based water monitoring system that measures the water level. Their model was built on the idea that the water level can be a critical parameter for flood incidences, particularly in risk-prone areas. A water level sensor is applied to trace the desired parameter, and if the water level touches the parameter, the indicator will be fed in real time to the water distribution network. A cloud server was designed as the data repository. The measurement of water levels is demonstrated in a remote dashboard, which enables sustainable water management.

It is essential to assess sustainable water management based on IoT, automate water storage and distribution, and reduce wastage [Citation67]. Based on requirement analysis, the study proposed a designed IoT system. The study discovered that challenges while developing a system are multi-faceted. The dearth of awareness, illiteracy, and digital barriers among construction workers had to be resolved. Besides, establishing a system scenario that integrates sustainability components is needed further. Deploying a structure helped facilitate construction concerning water accessibility. As the model framework in the installed water system is validated, the network will be operated.

Effective water supply management at construction sites can be among the significant areas of IoT applications [Citation68]. Water supply efficiency can be measured remotely using IoT by monitoring overflow, leakage conditions and, eventually, the whole construction site. The system where IoT is being applied comprises entrenched hardware in which sensors and microcontrollers offer messages and gain feedback from each other with the aid of the Internet. This process can be monitored and regulated remotely, as shown in (Appendix B). In IoT techniques for water supply management, scalability is crucial because water management systems need to adapt to changing demands, population growth, and environmental factors [Citation69,Citation70]. Implementing scalable IoT solutions ensures that as the system grows or more devices are added (such as sensors for monitoring water levels, quality, or pipeline conditions), the infrastructure can handle the increased data flow and processing requirements without significant performance degradation [Citation71,Citation72].

In the case of IoT techniques for water supply management, replicability allows successful solutions to be deployed in various regions or communities facing similar challenges [Citation73]. This is particularly important for addressing water management issues common across different geographic locations, such as drought management, leak detection, or water quality monitoring [Citation74]. The proposed method’s replicability ensures that effective solutions can be implemented in multiple settings, maximizing their impact and reducing the need to reinvent the wheel in each location. By focusing on scalability and replicability, IoT techniques can help improve water supply management by providing real-time data, optimizing resource allocation, identifying inefficiencies, and enabling proactive maintenance and interventions [Citation75,Citation76]. This enhances operational efficiency and contributes to sustainability efforts and resilience in water-related challenges. In construction projects, water management using IoT involves adopting smart technology to optimize, control, and monitor water usage throughout the project duration. This can be achieved using smart sensors, data gathering and analysis, remote control and monitoring, leak prevention and detection, computerized irrigation systems, monitoring water quality, incorporation with building management systems (BMS), real-time notifications and alerts, data reporting and visualization, flexibility and scalability. Adopting IoT-based water management in building schemes aids in conservation of water resources, enhances operational efficiency, lessens costs, and improves sustainability.

Industry 4.0, building information modelling, green IoT and prefabricated design

Results further revealed that Industry 4.0 accounted for 3.6%, BIM (9.1%), green IoT 5 (9.1%), and prefabricated design 2 (3.6%) of the summarized literature in . Overcoming IoT project implementation challenges requires addressing eight significant challenges: data gathering and management, administration, innovation, cost, technology integration, efficient environment, security, people, business solutions and value addition. Martens et al. [Citation77] further identified seven actions for resolving challenges: scalability, architecture, sustainability and project reliability, ensuring support and security, resources, data, and project administration and interaction processes. Thus, their study contributed primarily to the literature, explaining the co-occurrence and the relationships between actions and challenges. Thus, results could guide experts in IoT project implementation.

Integrating IoT and BIM in construction can help to investigate the corresponding IoT and BIM research fields. Chen et al. [Citation78] argued that the BIM-IoT integration research concentrating on construction intelligence with BIM as the foundation for applying and investigating IoT-BIM integration in construction sustainability concentrates on the initial life cycle phases. BIM offers a framework for data sharing and communication between participants involved in the total life cycle of construction. Likewise, it enables inhabitants to build sustainable planning and decision-making [Citation78]. More emerging tools, including big data and cloud computing, are required to enhance sustainable construction and realize building-sustaining intelligent towns. Similarly, researchers must pay attention to the viable transformation of existing buildings.

Network and bibliometric analysis of IoT, BIM and digital twin (DT) was conducted to observe the application of IoT, BIM and DT in the building industry [Citation79]. The study demonstrated that IoT, BIM and DT in building, heritage BIM, BIM, intelligent contracts, ontology, AR and VR in DT and BIM are major research themes. Numerous future aspects for further research are identified, comprising metaverse and BIM tools. Metaheuristic algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) for BIM optimization, IoT, and circular economy [Citation79]. Exploiting IoT and BIM for managing cognitive buildings can define a digitally enabled framework for operating cognitive buildings. Pasini et al. [Citation80] attempted a model framework development and identified a digitally enabled framework for operative cognitive buildings, offering a case study by which it has been possible to analyze how collected data amid operations could inform end-users. A link between as-designed virtual models and as-delivered physical assets could be created to explore how BIM technologies and practices can improve data-driven asset management via enriching construction data in operation. The findings should detect how information and data collected along the building lifecycle might offer services to operators.

Green IoT enabling technologies were used to explore how different enabling technologies could be organized effectively to realize a Green IoT [Citation81]. The study discussed numerous IoT projects, applications, and regulation efforts that are presently being executed. The study identified some evolving challenges that need to be resolved in the future to implement Green IoT. Enhancing objects’ abilities and developing a smooth setting so that society benefits from IoT innovation. Wang [Citation82] attempted a model development by adopting the concept of IoT to develop a green campus setting to realize the energy savings concepts. The architecture of the building campus is recognized, and three systems applications have been created. The results of this study enable efficient management of the campus’ air conditioners and computer laps. Thus, the network of sensors will enable energy efficiency since data is sporadically reported and the analysis is performed instantly, to trace issues.

It is essential to assess how IoT can enable a cleaner and greener environment through Green IoT. Gadre and Gadre [Citation83] highlighted different tools and concerns about Green IoT and how it can increase energy efficiency. However, the study has enlightened the IoT concepts, their characteristics, security challenges, and trends for technology adoption. Modeling barriers to IoT and supply chain management can help identify and prioritize the critical factors that impede the application of IoT in off-site projects. Green IoT, visions, usages and research challenges were analyzed by Varjovi and Babaie [Citation84] to identify effective measures for achieving GIoT at various levels. This study analyzed IoT technology’s business platforms and models, given the central role of environmental conservation in human life, by introducing active IT industries. However, the study exposed problems and directions of GIoT, comprising technical challenges, standardization, innovations and security, which were identified for future research. It is expected that operative policies for developing GIoT will be presented by resolving the salient tasks and articulating suitable standards. There is a need to address the green goal in the overall GIoT cycle, including production, design, usage and recycling/disposal.

Instances of successful integrations of IoT with industry 4.0 and BIM can have practical implications on smart building systems involving IoT sensors, Industry 4.0 automation, and BIM integration [Citation85]. Similarly, it enhances manufacturing plant optimization using IoT-enabled equipment, Industry 4.0 analytics, and BIM facility planning [Citation86]. Additionally, it improves supply chain visibility though industry 4.0 data analytics, IoT tracking devices and BIM for logistics planning [Citation87]. Another potential practical application relates to smart infrastructure development via IoT-enabled infrastructure, industry 4.0 predictive maintenance and BIM for infrastructure management [Citation48]. These examples illustrate how integrating IoT, Industry 4.0, and BIM can derive efficiency and innovation across various construction and manufacturing sectors to manage supply chain and infrastructure development. By leveraging real-time data advanced analytics and insights, companies can improve their operations, optimize decision making and boost overall project performance.

IoT implementation in construction offers exceptional challenges because of the desire to balance ecological sustainability with technological improvements [Citation88,Citation89]. In this review, some specific strategies for overcoming these challenges were identified. These comprised energy-efficient IoT gadgets, lifecycle assessment, renewable energy integration, optimized data transmission, material selection and eco-design, and regulatory standards and compliance. By implementing these strategies, construction companies can overcome challenges in green IoT and promote sustainable innovation that benefits society and the environment.

Adoption of IoT in the construction industry

IoT adoption level in the construction industry accounted for 10.9% of the analyzed studies. IoT capabilities and roles can be assessed to highlight the significance of using IoT-based tools in additive manufacturing. Ashima et al. [Citation90] attempted a framework development. They identified the objectives of sustainable production that can be realized due to the adoption of IoT in 3D printing technology. Likewise, the IoT-based AM process is novel; limited sources exist in the field. IoT-enabled AM analysis has been performed and analyzed in detail to recognize application areas. Hence, IoT-enabled AM aids in creating sustainable resolutions for humankind and meeting clients’ demands in the defined period, contributing to mass personalization, the primary goal in 4IR. IoT application model and construction management are needed to prove how IoT adoption initiatives for supply-demand-side systems operate. Le et al. [Citation91] attempted a model development.

The simulated interconnectedness of objects and humans exerts decision-making efficacy and responsive comfort for system operators, other third-party actors, and end users, leading to the adoption of IoT-based platforms for making and utilizing. Results further indicated the high competitive advantages of local industries. They proposed vertical incorporation in joint ventures as the entry approach for foreign financiers. Trends and patterns in IoT research were analyzed to identify and rank the perceived significance level of significant research fields related to the IoT and the construction industry. Ghosh et al. [Citation45] applied an interpretive philosophical lens. Their findings indicated an area of study in a fledging phase, with an insignificant number of professionals working somewhat in isolation and proposing one-phase solutions rather than an integrated, all-inclusive method. The significant impact of IoT implementation in building business was identified as complete control of the process, high-speed reporting, explosion of data triggering data analytics, and strict legal and ethical expectations.

IoT adoption’s major drivers were data security and privacy, interoperability, flexible authority arrangement, proper business preparation and simulations. Thus, this study is the first scientometric analysis of the literature within the context of IoT applications in the building industry. Results uncovered knowledge gaps in current research, explicitly a broader consideration of company amendments required to acclimatize the application of IoT, economic analyses and barriers to broader acceptance. Technological proficiencies using IoT facilitate the eco-friendly adoption of construction industries, which are primarily facing challenges – Gaspar et al. [Citation92] characterized companies involving medium and small industries regarding IoT adoption. The study revealed the level of maturity, complexity, opportunities, potential, solutions, and obstacles to IoT adoption. However, this study was based on 21 firms.

Hence, future studies should include a larger sample to increase characterization, representativeness and generalization of medium and small enterprises. IoT potentials in the building industry include outlining the need to understand concepts, applications, developments, and potential benefits of IoT in the building industry, which stakeholders must recognize before adoption. Dilakshan et al. [Citation46] revealed that IoT expression is best comprehended as a metaphor that summarizes integrating all relevant things within connectivity and communications space. The study laid a foundation for increasing awareness to implement and facilitate IoT applications in building schemes. However, as revealed by this study, the absence of empirical literature on adopting the IoT model offers a valuable contribution to the increasing body of knowledge. Sustainable implementation and the benefits and challenges of evolving 4IR and IoT tools are essential for reassessing the state-of-the-art 4IR and IoT in terms of building and examining the level of understanding among experts concerning the benefits of IoT implementation [Citation21]. The most significant benefit of these tools is that they will contribute to sustainable policy requirements, with the most pressing tool being the lack of skills and talent in applying 4IR and IoT tools. This study’s findings improved a sustainable pathway to the building industry community, establishing its relevance by incorporating major stakeholders and those involved in these technologies.

Moreover, this review provides some real-world examples of successful IoT adoption in construction projects, including smart construction sites, monitoring and maintenance of equipment, building automation systems, managing supply chain, safety monitoring and compliance [Citation48]. Wearable sensors can track vital signs, detect falls, and alert emergency supervisors [Citation93]. For instance, the construction firm Gilbane Building Company implemented a wearable IoT solution called SmartVest to monitor workers’ vital signs and detect signs of fatigue or distress, helping to prevent accidents and improve overall safety performance. These examples demonstrate how IoT adoption in construction projects can deliver tangible benefits such as improved efficiency, enhanced safety, cost savings, and better project outcomes. IoT implementation in the construction industry enables strategies for fostering a culture of innovation and overcoming resistance to change in construction management [Citation94,Citation95]. These strategies comprised leadership commitment, training and education, collaborative approach, pilot and proof of concepts, change management strategies, recognition and incentives. Thus, implementing these strategies by construction firms can promote a culture of innovation, overcome opposition to change, and maximize the benefits of IoT technology in construction schemes. Operative leadership, collaboration, education and change management are the critical components for driving successful IoT adoption in the building business.

The implementation of IoT in the building industry has been gaining traction over the last decade, transforming the mode in which building projects are designed, implemented, and managed. There are some major areas where IoT is making an impact. These comprised remote management and monitoring, safety monitoring, tracking and managing equipment, predictive maintenance, optimizing supply chain, energy management, smart infrastructure and automation, and informed decision-making. Generally, IoT adoption in the construction business holds immense potential to drive efficiency, improve safety and lessen costs throughout the project lifecycle. As technology evolves continuously, greater IoT integration can be expected to offer solutions in building activities, paving the way for a smarter, more sustainable built environment.

Other

Other aspects of Internet of Things (IoT) implementation for sustainable construction projects constituted 27.3% of the analyzed articles. Understanding IoT opportunities and challenges for international development based on UN SDGs could substantially contribute to environmental, social and economic development. This research’s findings can be applied successfully in developing nations. The framework focused on the IoT concerning profitable IoT programs in emerging economies concerning SDGs. Integrating pay-as-you-go low-cost IoT is the best scenario for developing IoT to realize the SDGs by 2030. IoT as an SDG facilitating tool concerning Smart Readiness Indicator(SRI) can be proposed as a measure-analyze-decide and act framework to measure SRI regarding environmental energy efficiency and COVID-19 inhibition models using an iterative approach [Citation96]. Two theoretical spaces (digital and physical) within 2D infrastructures and users) are chosen over an IoT 3D model (data-driven decision, interoperable interaction and data acquisition). The study implemented an IoT environment (sensors) as a proof-of-concept for an innovative campus. Concerning CO2 and energy efficiency supervising, the findings revealed effectiveness via real connections, representing the IoT perspective as SDG-enabling tools. However, these contributions enable experimental tests and a reference model for direct application in academic works, research projects, and formal creative projects, extendable to specialized settings and cities.

After implementing and installing IoT maneuvers on a city-wide scale, safeguarding these maneuvers and the related communications links becomes a critical problem [Citation97]. Thus, further analysis of the potential security threats for IoT in a smart city setting, promising countermeasures, and open research issues need to be addressed by future studies. IoT-based innovative transportation networks for smart cities can augment intelligent transportation networks with ICT as a tool – for infrastructure and vehicle-to-vehicle communication. Recently, autonomous vehicles have gained particular attention, and many researchers are working to enhance this technology [Citation98]. IoT-based innovative parking framework for smart cities was analyzed. Thus, with the advent of innovative city initiatives, the issues addressed in this study are critical. This study offered city planners, legislators, policymakers, and administrators a clear vision and idea.

IoT and inventory management might produce value for their companies by tapping into IoT technologies. Mashayekhy et al. [Citation99] indicated an increased research on this topic. A wide range of periodicals are paying attention, particularly to IoT and releasing more results in this research direction. Improving a supply chain into an integrated 4IR supply is beneficial. Given the vicissitudes in 4th generation technology compared to preceding generations, the traditional inventory replenishment policies method appears unresponsive enough to new technologies. It cannot cope well with IoT systems. Promoting UN SDGs via IoT was reported by de Villiers et al. [Citation100]. The study contributed to progress on the UN’s SDGs through framework development and outlined business opportunities for providing measurement tools connected to the Internet (IoT), which sends data into the blockchain, offering trusted data a motivation for others to contribute toward UN’s SDGs. Start-ups and existing businesses exploit these opportunities to stimulate employee participation, donations, volunteers, and other participants. The study provided a conceptual framework for the different ways businesses can play a role in facilitating the measurement of SDGs and trust in these capacities by connecting technology. IoT and Big data analytics were assessed by Sun et al. [Citation101] to introduce a new concept called smart and connected communities (SCC). The study shed light on the challenges and opportunities of applying big data and IoT analytics to the cultural revitalization and preservation of SCC. The intelligent application of IoT and big data analytics is expected to breathe novel life into the traditional, close-knit culture of SCC. Hence, this study offers TreSight, combining IoT and big data analytics for intelligent tourism and sustainable cultural heritage.

IoT implementation in some areas showed robustness in improving cost efficiency and sustainable supply chains in agriculture, healthcare, smart cities, manufacturing, retail and transportation [Citation102,Citation103]. For instance, FarmBot is a robotic network the plants, waters and autonomously maintains crops. Firms such as Propeller health have created IoT-aided inhalers that track the use of medications and environmental factors to aid in managing COPD and asthma [Citation104]. These gadgets collect data on where and when the inhaler is applied, along with information on air quality, offering insights to healthcare providers and patients. Smart parking spaces (e.g. San Francisco and Barcelona) have implemented smart parking systems that utilize sensors to detect the availability of parking spaces in real-time. In manufacturing (predictive maintenance), firms, including General Electric and Siemens, use IoT radars and machine learning algorithms to implement foretelling maintenance in manufacturing industries [Citation105]. Smart shelves are relevant to retailing industries such as Walmart; Amazon is trying IoT-aided smart shelves that track inventory automatically in real-time using sensors and RFID tags on products that communicate with the shelf system for inventory data update [Citation106]. Fleet management in transportation utilizes IoT to track their vehicles and enhance route planning and fuel efficiency [Citation107,Citation108]. These case studies illustrate the diverse uses of IoT across different industries, showcasing its impending to improve efficiency, lessen costs, and increase decision-making processes.

It is noteworthy to highlight the potential future trends and emerging technologies in IoT for sustainable construction projects to add forward-looking insights [Citation109,Citation110]. Some of these potential emerging technologies and future trends or sustainable construction projects. These comprised smart construction management systems, predictive maintenance, energy harvesting, block chain for supply chain transparency, and augmented reality for building [Citation111,Citation112]. Optimizing waste management, site monitoring using drones, prefabricated and modular construction, green compliance certification, Urban sensing and urban sensing, and integrating smart cities. IoT sensors integration into construction for real-time control and monitoring of energy use, lighting, temperature and occupancy can enhance resource utilization and waste reduction [Citation113,Citation114]. By embracing these technologies and trends, sustainable building projects can realize more smart and resilient cities.

Proposed framework

Novel cutting-edge technologies, including the Internet of Things (IoT), will continue to grow owing to its increasing relevance in the construction industry. The implementation of IoT in the construction industry is still in its early stages despite its enormous potential. IoT-based 4IR technologies are altering construction practices and existing construction models in the face of developing construction industries. This review proposed a theoretical framework for implementing the Internet of Things (IoT) for sustainable construction projects (). The framework was founded on improved performance/management in the construction industry. It was based on the theoretical foundation of improved management/performance of construction projects monitoring, safety, project management, machine control, fleet management and sustainable construction management, which are driven by IoT within the context of 4IR and finally lead to the overall improvement of construction project’s performance.

Figure 3. The proposed theoretical framework of IoT implementation for sustainable construction projects.

Figure 3. The proposed theoretical framework of IoT implementation for sustainable construction projects.

IoT framework implementation involves many important phases, stakeholders, and challenges [Citation115,Citation116]. These major steps comprised identifying use cases, defining requirements, hardware and software selection, developing models, development and integration, analytics and data management, privacy and security, maintenance and scalability, managers and business owners, ICT departments, development teams, end users, regulators and compliance officers, external partners, interoperability, i.e. seamless interactions between various IoT platforms and devices, security risks, scalability and complexity, cost and regulatory compliance. After addressing these major phases involving pertinent major stakeholders and proactively resolving possible challenges, companies can improve the practical use of this IoT formwork [Citation117,Citation118].

Conclusion

Understanding Internet of Things (IoT) implementation for sustainable construction projects is essential. This study reports our novel attempt to increase our understanding of implementing the Internet of Things (IoT) for sustainable construction projects. The study employed a systematic approach to select and filter literature. Finally, 55 studies were chosen and analyzed. The general findings are as follows:

  1. The physiognomies of the chosen papers are abridged in and . Based on the summary, monitoring accounted for 9 (16.4%), Machine/equipment control 2 (3.6%), Safety in Construction 5 (9.1%), Water management 4 (7.3%), 4IR 2 (3.6%), BIM 5 (9.1%), Green IoT 5 (9.1%), Prefabricated Design 2 (3.6%), IoT adoption level 6 (10.9%). It accounted for 15 others (27.3%).

  2. BIM, remote application monitoring, construction management, repair and equipment services, construction implements, and tracking equipment are the foremost areas of IoT application in the building industry.

  3. However, there is a dearth of research awareness concerning the possibilities of IoT-BIM integration by construction companies.

  4. Integrating IoT, CM, and 3DP enables us to digitalize buildings and provide computerized and reliable features to the users.

  5. Lack of infrastructure, cyber risks, dearth of trust in IoT, AI and inadequate funds are causal factors hindering IoT and AI adoption in developing smart cities.

  6. IoT-enabled uncrewed aerial vehicles for project site inspection can help to present the integration of modern IoT trends with uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs).

  7. The actual integration and expansion of applications based on IoT rely on the capacity to explore the necessary professional profiles and skills critical for adopting IoT schemes and perception of the relevant aspects for users, including legal, privacy and security concerns.

  8. IoT technology has revolutionized construction companies’ safety management, improving site safety. Demystifying IoT in the building industry is essential to increase understanding of the state-of-the-art IoT implementation in the 4IR building industry context and provide a reference for project managers to identify challenges.

  9. More emerging tools, including big data and cloud computing, are required to enhance sustainable construction and realize building-sustaining intelligent towns. Similarly, researchers must pay attention to the viable transformation of existing buildings.

  10. The results present a rich understanding of off-site contracts to recognize the implications of IoT tools in supply chain management and what to expect while applying solutions and technologies.

  11. It is expected that operative policies for developing GIoT will be presented by resolving the salient tasks and articulating suitable standards. There is a need to address the green goal in the overall GIoT cycle, including production, design, usage and recycling/disposal.

  12. The significant impact of IoT implementation in building business was identified as complete control of the process, high-speed reporting, explosion of data triggering data analytics, and strict legal and ethical expectations.

  13. Visualization, wireless fidelity and wireless sensor networks, electronic product code, Bluetooth and internet protocol are the most implemented IoT aspects in the building industry.

  14. IoT potentials in the building industry include outlining the need to understand concepts, applications, developments, and potential benefits of IoT in the building industry, which stakeholders must recognize before adoption.

  15. IoT-based innovative transportation networks for smart cities can augment intelligent transportation networks with ICT as a tool – for infrastructure and vehicle-to-vehicle communication.

  16. With integrated communication and sensing capabilities, the IoT has robust potential for strong, informed, sustainable resource management in rural and urban communities.

Despite many studies on IoT adoption, there is less literature concerning challenges and awareness of how IoT tools affect implementation in the building industry. Hence, this review narrowed the gap by proposing a framework for implementing sustainable construction projects. However, further analysis of the potential security threats for IoT in a smart city setting, promising countermeasures, and open research issues need to be addressed by future studies.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University for funding this research work through the project number [PSAU/2023/01/ 25550].

References

  • Kazmi ZA, Sodangi M. Modeling the constraints to the utilization of the internet of things in managing supply chains of off-site construction: an approach toward sustainable construction. Buildings. 2022;12(3):388. doi: 10.3390/buildings12030388
  • Elghaish F, Hosseini MR, Matarneh S, et al. Blockchain and the ‘Internet of things’ for the construction industry: research trends and opportunities. Autom Constr. 2021 jan 12;132:103942. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103942
  • Xiong F, Xu C, Ren W, et al. A blockchain-based edge collaborative detection scheme for construction internet of things. Autom Constr. 2022 Jan 02;134:104066. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104066
  • Zhou JX, Shen GQ, Yoon SH, et al. Customization of on-site assembly services by integrating the internet of things and BIM technologies in modular integrated construction. Autom Constr. 2021 Jan 06;126:103663. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103663
  • Xiao Y, Bhola J. Design and optimization of prefabricated building system based on BIM technology. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2022;13(Suppl S1):111–120. doi: 10.1007/s13198-021-01288-4
  • Zhang S, Li Z, Li L, et al. Interface management performance assessment framework for sustainable prefabricated construction. Buildings. 2022;12(5):631. doi: 10.3390/buildings12050631
  • Zhong RY, Peng Y, Xue F, et al. Prefabricated construction enabled by the Internet-of-Things. Autom Constr. 2017 Jan 04;76:59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.006
  • Larsen MSS, Lindhard SM, Brunoe TD, et al. Mass customization in the house building industry: literature review and research directions. Front Built Environ. 2019;5:115. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00115
  • Amiri Ara R, Paardenkooper K, van Duin R. A new blockchain system design to improve the supply chain of engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) companies–a case study in the oil and gas sector. J Eng, Des Technol. 2022;20(4):887–913.
  • Sun Q. Design, integration, and evaluation of IoT-Based electrochromic building envelopes for visual comfort and energy efficiency. 2022;3118. All Dissertations.
  • Dave B, Kubler S, Främling K, et al. Opportunities for enhanced lean construction management using Internet of things standards. Automation In Construct. 2016 Jan 01;61:86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.10.009
  • Zhou C, Luo H, Fang W, et al. Cyber-physical-system-based safety monitoring for blind hoisting with the internet of things: a case study. Automation In Construct. 2019 Jan 01;97:138–150. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.017
  • Wang Z, Hu H, Gong J, et al. Precast supply chain management in off-site construction: a critical literature review. J Clean Prod. 2019;232:1204–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.229
  • Bullen P, Love P. Factors influencing the adaptive re‐use of buildings. J Eng Design Technol. 2011;9(1):32–46. doi: 10.1108/17260531111121459
  • Gamil Y, Abdullah MA, Abd Rahman I, et al. Internet of things in construction industry revolution 4.0. J Eng, Des Technol. 2020;18(5):1091–1102. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-06-2019-0164
  • Rejeb A, Suhaiza Z, Rejeb K, et al. The internet of things and the circular economy: a systematic literature review and research agenda. J Clean Prod. 2022;350:131439. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131439
  • Samaranayake P, Laosirihongthong T, Adebanjo D, et al. Prioritising enabling factors of Internet of Things (IoT) adoption in digital supply chain. Int J Productivity Perform Manag. 2022;72(10):3095–3118.
  • Pasi BN, Mahajan SK, Rane SB. Smart supply chain management: a perspective of industry 4.0. Supply Chain Manag. 2020;29(5):3016–3030.
  • Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, et al. Understanding the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in improving environmental sustainability. Sustain Operations And Comput. 2022;3:203–217.
  • You Z, Feng L. Integration of industry 4.0 related technologies in construction industry: a framework of cyber-physical system. IEEE Access. 2020;8:122908–122922.
  • Maqbool R, Saiba MR, Ashfaq S. Emerging industry 4.0 and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in the Ghanaian construction industry: sustainability, implementation challenges, and benefits. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023;30(13):37076–37091.
  • Kissi E, Aigbavboa C, Kuoribo E. Emerging technologies in the construction industry: challenges and strategies in Ghana. Constr Innovation. 2023;23(2):383–405. doi: 10.1108/CI-11-2021-0215
  • Nguyen HM, McDonald S, Au B, et al. Benefits, drawbacks, and future directions of lean on the fashion and textile industry. In: Lean supply chain management in fashion and textile industry. Berlin/Heidelberg (Germany): Springer; 2022. p. 291–312.
  • Czinkota MR. Distribution and supply chain management. Mark Manag: Past, Present Future. 2021;24:499–552.
  • Babaeian Jelodar M, Sutrisna M. Guest editorial: working smarter by applying advanced technologies in construction: enhancing capacity and capability in construction sector for infrastructure project delivery. J Eng Design Technol. 2022;20(4):861–865. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-08-2022-744
  • Arowoiya VA, Oke AE, Aigbavboa CO, et al. An appraisal of the adoption internet of things (IoT) elements for sustainable construction. J Eng, Des Technol. 2020;18(5):1193–1208. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-10-2019-0270
  • Mahmood AF, Rafaa MM. Designing a collection of two IoT-systems for real time health telemonitoring. J Eng Design Technol. 2022;20(1):86–98. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-12-2020-0542
  • Abioye SO, Oyedele LO, Akanbi L, et al. Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: a review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. J Building Eng. 2021;44:103299. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103299
  • Dong XS, Fujimoto A, Ringen K, et al. Injury underreporting among small establishments in the construction industry. Am J Ind Med. 2011;54(5):339–349. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20928
  • Tamura T, Huang M, Yoshimura T, et al. An advanced internet of things system for heatstroke prevention with a noninvasive dual-heat-flux thermometer. Sensors. 2022;22(24):9985. doi: 10.3390/s22249985
  • Seshadri DR, Li RT, Voos JE, et al. Wearable sensors for monitoring the internal and external workload of the athlete. Npj Digital Med. 2019;2(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0149-2
  • Qin E, Long Y, Zhang C, et al. Cloud Computing and the Internet of Things: Technology Innovation in Automobile Service. In: Yamamoto S, editor. Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Interaction for Health, Safety, Mobility and Complex Environments. HIMI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8017. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39215-3_21
  • Sepasgozar SME, Blair J. Measuring non-road diesel emissions in the construction industry: a synopsis of the literature. Int J Construct Manag. 2021;21(6):582–597. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1573479
  • Uma S, Eswari R. Accident prevention and safety assistance using IOT and machine learning. J Reliable Intell Environ. 2022;8(2):79–103. doi: 10.1007/s40860-021-00136-3
  • Biswal AK, Singh D, Pattanayak BK, et al. IoT-based smart alert system for drowsy driver detection. Wireless Commun Mob Comput. 2021;2021:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2021/6627217
  • Lee I, Lee K. The Internet of things (IoT): applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Bus Horiz. 2015;58(4):431–440.
  • Swan M. Sensor mania! the internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. J Sens Actuator Networks. 2012;1(3):217–253.
  • Ishida T, Maekawa K, Kishi T. Enhanced modeling of moisture equilibrium and transport in cementitious materials under arbitrary temperature and relative humidity history. Cement Concr Res. 2007;37(4):565–578. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.015
  • Tahsien SM, Karimipour H, Spachos P. Machine learning based solutions for security of Internet of Things (IoT): a survey. J Network Comput Appl. 2020;161:102630.
  • Attaran M. The internet of things: limitless opportunities for business and society. J Strateg Innov Sustainability. 2017;12(1):11.
  • Khan SU, Khan R, Zaheer R, et al. Future internet: the internet of things architecture, possible applications and key challenges. In: 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology; Islamabad, Pakistan. 2012. p. 257–260. doi:10.1109/FIT.2012.53
  • Abomhara M, Køien GM. Cyber security and the internet of things: vulnerabilities, threats, intruders and attacks. J Cyber Secur Mobility. 2015;4(1):65–88–65–88. doi: 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.414
  • Alwadhenani A, Yoon Y, Sharma R. Review for construction and demolition waste materials and control practices in the US. Construct Res Congr. 2022;25:552–560.
  • Millati R, Cahyono RB, Ariyanto T, et al. Agricultural, industrial, municipal, and forest wastes: an overview. Sustain Resource Recovery Zero Waste Approaches. 2019;21:1–22.
  • Ghosh A, Edwards DJ, Hosseini MR. Patterns and trends in Internet of Things (IoT) research: future applications in the construction industry. Eng, Construct Architectural Manag. 2021;28(2):457–481.
  • Dilakshan S, Rathnasinghe AP, Seneviratne LIP. Potential of internet of things (IOT) in the construction industry. Proceedings The 9th World Construction Symposium| July (p. 446); University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. 2021. http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/16616
  • Li CZ, Chen Z, Xue F, et al. A blockchain- and IoT-based smart product-service system for the sustainability of prefabricated housing construction. J Clean Prod. 2021;286:125391. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125391
  • Jia M, Komeily A, Wang Y, et al. Adopting internet of things for the development of smart buildings: a review of enabling technologies and applications. Autom Constr. 2019;101:111–126. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.023
  • Gold S, Hahn R, Seuring S. Sustainable supply chain management in “Base of the Pyramid” food projects—a path to triple bottom line approaches for multinationals? Int Bus Rev. 2013 10/01/2013;22(5):784–799. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.12.006
  • Azevedo SG, Carvalho H, Duarte S, et al. Influence of green and lean upstream supply chain management practices on business sustainability. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2012;59(4):753–765. doi:10.1109/TEM.2012.2189108
  • Andrade L, O’Dwyer J, O’Neill E, et al. Surface water flooding, groundwater contamination, and enteric disease in developed countries: a scoping review of connections and consequences. Environ Pollut. 2018;236:540–549. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.104
  • Wali S, Alias N. Multi-pollutant approach to model contaminants flow in surface and groundwater: a review. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; Genoa, Italy. IOP Publishing; 2020; vol. 884. p. 012030.
  • Oke AE, Arowoiya VA. Critical barriers to augmented reality technology adoption in developing countries: a case study of Nigeria. J Eng Design Technol. 2022;20(5):1320–1333. doi: 10.1108/JEDT-12-2020-0519
  • Wolfert S, Isakhanyan G. Sustainable agriculture by the Internet of Things–a practitioner’s approach to monitor sustainability progress. Computers Electronics In Agriculture. 2022;200:107226. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2022.107226
  • Singh R, Gehlot A, Akram SV, et al. Cloud manufacturing, internet of things-assisted manufacturing and 3D printing technology: reliable tools for sustainable construction. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7327. doi: 10.3390/su13137327
  • Tabatabaee S, Mohandes SR, Ahmed RR, et al. Investigating the barriers to applying the internet-of-things-based technologies to construction site safety management. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(2):868. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020868
  • Tang S, Shelden DR, Eastman CM, et al. A review of building information modeling (BIM) and the internet of things (IoT) devices integration: present status and future trends. Autom Constr. 2019 05/01/2019;101:127–139. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.020
  • Sarkar D, Patel H, Dave B. Development of integrated cloud-based Internet of Things (IoT) platform for asset management of elevated metro rail projects. Int J Construct Manag. 2022;22(10):1993–2002.
  • Fang S, Xu LD, Zhu Y, et al. An integrated system for regional environmental monitoring and management based on internet of things. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2014;10(2):1596–1605. doi: 10.1109/TII.2014.2302638
  • Thibaud M, Chi H, Zhou W, et al. Internet of Things (IoT) in high-risk environment, health and safety (EHS) industries: a comprehensive review. Decis Support Syst. 2018 Jan 04;108:79–95. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2018.02.005
  • Ali SM. Drivers for Internet of Things (IoT) adoption in supply chains: Implications for sustainability in the post-pandemic era. Comput & Ind Eng. 2023 Jan 09;183:109515. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109515
  • Mohammed BH, Sallehuddin H, Yadegaridehkordi E, et al. Nexus between building information modeling and internet of things in the construction industries. Appl Sci. 2022;12(20):10629. doi: 10.3390/app122010629
  • Zhou C, Ding LY. Safety barrier warning system for underground construction sites using Internet-of-Things technologies. Autom Constr. 2017 Jan 11; 83:372–389. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.005
  • Pospelova V, López-Baldominos I, Fernández-Sanz L, et al. User and professional aspects for sustainable computing based on the internet of things in Europe. Sensors. 2023;23(1):529. doi: 10.3390/s23010529
  • Sharma M, Joshi S, Kannan D, et al. Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers of smart cities’ waste management: an Indian context. J Cleaner Production. 2020;270(10):122047. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122047
  • Perumal T, Sulaiman MN, Leong CY. Internet of Things (IoT) enabled water monitoring system. In: 2015 IEEE 4th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE); 2015 Oct 27–30. p. 86–87. doi: 10.1109/GCCE.2015.7398710
  • Narendran S, Pradeep P, Ramesh MV. An Internet of Things (IoT) based sustainable water management. In: 2017 IEEE global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC). San Jose (CA): IEEE; 2017. p. 1–6.
  • Gautam G, Sharma G, Magar BT, et al. Usage of IoT framework in water supply management for smart city in Nepal. Appl Sci. 2021;11(12):5662. doi: 10.3390/app11125662
  • Gonçalves R, Soares JJ, Lima RM. An IoT-based framework for smart water supply systems management. Future Internet. 2020;12(7):114. doi: 10.3390/fi12070114
  • Dogo EM, Salami AF, Nwulu NI, et al. Blockchain and internet of things-based technologies for intelligent water management system. Artif Intel In IoT. 2019;17:129–150.
  • Overmars A, Venkatraman S. Towards a secure and scalable iot infrastructure: a pilot deployment for a smart water monitoring system. Technologies. 2020;8(4):50. doi: 10.3390/technologies8040050
  • Wong BP, Kerkez B. Real-time environmental sensor data: an application to water quality using web services. Environ Modell Software. 2016;84:505–517. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.020
  • Kamienski C, Soininen J-P, Taumberger M, et al. Smart water management platform: IoT-based precision irrigation for agriculture. Sensors. 2019;19(2):276. doi: 10.3390/s19020276
  • Saad A, Benyamina A, Gamatie A. Water management in agriculture: a survey on current challenges and technological solutions. IEEE Access. 2020;8:38082–38097. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2974977
  • Alshami A, Ali E, Elsayed M, et al. IoT Innovations in sustainable water and wastewater management and water quality monitoring: a comprehensive review of advancements, implications, and future directions. IEEE Access. 2024;12:58427–58453. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3392573
  • Kotwal MVS, Pati S, Patil J. Review on Ai and Iot based integrated smart water management and distribution system. Educ Adm: Theory Pract. 2024;30(4):594–605.
  • Martens CDP, Silva LFD, Silva DF, et al. Challenges in the implementation of internet of things projects and actions to overcome them. Technovation. 2022 Jan 12;118:102427. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102427
  • Chen Y, Wang X, Liu Z, et al. Exploring building information modeling (BIM) and Internet of Things (IoT) integration for sustainable building. Buildings. 2023;13(2):288.
  • Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh M, Keivani A, Moehler RC, et al. Internet of Things (IoT), building information modeling (BIM), and digital twin (DT) in construction industry: a review, bibliometric, and network analysis. Buildings. 2022;12(10):1503.
  • Pasini D, Ventura SM, Rinaldi S, et al. Exploiting Internet of Things and building information modeling framework for management of cognitive buildings. In: 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2); Trento, Italy. IEEE; 2016. p. 1–6. doi:10.1109/ISC2.2016.7580817
  • Shaikh FK, Zeadally S, Exposito E. Enabling technologies for green internet of things. IEEE Syst J. 2015;11(2):983–994. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2415194
  • Wang H-I. Constructing the green campus within the internet of things architecture. Int J Distrib Sens Netw. 2014;10(3):804627. doi: 10.1155/2014/804627
  • Gadre M, Gadre C. Green Internet of Things (IoT): go green with IoT. Proc Iciot-2016, Zhangjiajie, China. 2016;4:1–6.
  • Varjovi AE, Babaie S. Green Internet of Things (GIoT): vision, applications and research challenges. Sustain Comput: Inf Syst. 2020 Jan 12;28:100448. doi: 10.1016/j.suscom.2020.100448
  • Banerjee A, Nayaka RR. A comprehensive overview on BIM-integrated cyber physical system architectures and practices in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. Constr Innovation. 2022;22(4):727–748. doi: 10.1108/CI-02-2021-0029
  • Cheng JCP, Chen W, Chen K, et al. Data-driven predictive maintenance planning framework for MEP components based on BIM and IoT using machine learning algorithms. Autom Constr. 2020;112:103087. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103087
  • Rejeb A, Simske S, Rejeb K, et al. Internet of things research in supply chain management and logistics: a bibliometric analysis. Internet Things. 2020;12:100318. doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2020.100318
  • Song M, Fisher R, Kwoh Y. Technological challenges of green innovation and sustainable resource management with large scale data. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2019;144:361–368. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.055
  • Silva BN, Khan M, Han K. Towards sustainable smart cities: a review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities Soc. 2018;38:697–713. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
  • Ashima R, Haleem A, Javaid M, et al. Understanding the role and capabilities of Internet of things-enabled additive manufacturing through its application areas. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res. 2022 2022/07/01;5(3):137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.12.001
  • Le DN, Le Tuan L, Dang Tuan MN. Smart-building management system: An Internet-of-Things (IoT) application business model in Vietnam. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2019 Jan 04;141:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.002
  • Gaspar PD, Fernandez CM, Soares VN, et al. Development of technological capabilities through the internet of things (Iot): Survey of opportunities and barriers for iot implementation in Portugal’s agro-industry. Appl Sci. 2021;11(8):3454.
  • Wang Z, Yang Z, Dong T. A review of wearable technologies for elderly care that can accurately track indoor position, recognize physical activities and monitor vital signs in real time. Sensors. 2017;17(2):341. doi: 10.3390/s17020341
  • Demirkesen S, Tezel A. Investigating major challenges for industry 4.0 adoption among construction companies. Eng, Construct Architectural Manag. 2022;29(3):1470–1503.
  • Agenda I. Shaping the future of construction a breakthrough in mindset and technology. World Econ Forum. 2016;23:11–16.
  • Martínez I, Zalba B, Trillo-Lado R, et al. Internet of things (Iot) as sustainable development goals (sdg) enabling technology towards smart readiness indicators (sri) for university buildings. Sustainability. 2021;13(14):7647.
  • Le-Dang Q, Le-Ngoc T. Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructures for smart cities. In: Maheswaran M Badidi E, editors. Handbook of smart cities: software services and cyber infrastructure. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 1–30.
  • Fantin Irudaya Raj E, Appadurai M. Internet of things-based smart transportation system for smart cities. In: Mukherjee S, Muppalaneni NB, Bhattacharya S Pradhan AK, editors. Intelligent systems for social good: theory and practice. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2022. p. 39–50.
  • Mashayekhy Y, Babaei A, Yuan X-M, et al. Impact of Internet of Things (IoT) on inventory management: a literature survey. Logistics. 2022;6(2):33.
  • de Villiers C, Kuruppu S, Dissanayake D. A (new) role for business–promoting the United Nations’ sustainable development goals through the internet-of-things and blockchain technology. J Bus Res. 2021;131:598–609.
  • Sun Y, Song H, Jara AJ, et al. Internet of things and big data analytics for smart and connected communities. IEEE Access. 2016;4:766–773. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2529723
  • Khan Y, Su’ud MBM, Alam MM, et al. Application of Internet of Things (IoT) in sustainable supply chain management. Sustainability. 2022;15(1):694.
  • Sujatha R, Ephzibah EP, Dharinya SS. IoTBDs applications: smart transportation, smart healthcare, smart grid, smart inventory system, smart cities, smart manufacturing, smart retail, smart agriculture, etc. In: The internet of things and big data analytics. Auerbach Publications; 2020. p. 275–300.
  • Murdyantoro B, Atmaja DSE, Rachmat H. Application design of farmbot based on Internet of Things (IoT). Int J On Adv Sci, Eng Inf Technol. 2019;9(4):1163–1170.
  • Pech M, Vrchota J, Bednář J. Predictive maintenance and intelligent sensors in smart factory: review. Sensors. 2021;21(4):1470. doi: 10.3390/s21041470
  • Akimana B-T, Bonnaerens M, Van Wilder J, et al. A survey of human-robot interaction in the internet of things. 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bjorn_Vuylsteker/publication/318722691_A_Survey_of_Human-Robot_Interaction_in_the_Internet_of_Things/links/5979adbdaca272177c1f4abc/A-Survey-of-Human-Robot-Interaction-in-the-Internet-of-Things.pdf.
  • Mehar S, Zeadally S, Remy G, et al. Sustainable transportation management system for a fleet of electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2014;16(3):1401–1414. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2367099
  • Jain A, Saini V, Choudhary C, et al. Improved intelligent fleet management system with data analytics and internet of things (IoT) for smart cities. 7th IET Smart Cities Symposium (SCS 2023), Hybrid Conference; Bahrain. 2023. p. 307–312. doi:10.1049/icp.2024.0943
  • Dixon T, Connaughton J, Green S. Understanding and shaping sustainable futures in the built environment to 2050. Sustain Futures In The Built Environ To 2050: A Foresight Approach To Construct Devel. 2018;30:337–364.
  • Allioui H, Mourdi Y. Exploring the full potentials of IoT for better financial growth and stability: a comprehensive survey. Sensors. 2023;23(19):8015. doi: 10.3390/s23198015
  • Patil M, Boraste S, Minde P. A comprehensive review on emerging trends in smart green building technologies and sustainable materials. Mater Today: Proc. 2022;65:1813–1822. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.866
  • Yevu SK, Ann T, Darko A. Digitalization of construction supply chain and procurement in the built environment: emerging technologies and opportunities for sustainable processes. J Clean Prod. 2021;322:129093. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129093
  • Metallidou CK, Psannis KE, Egyptiadou EA. Energy efficiency in smart buildings: IoT approaches. IEEE Access. 2020;8:63679–63699. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984461
  • Dong B, Prakash V, Feng F, et al. A review of smart building sensing system for better indoor environment control. Energy Build. 2019;199:29–46. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.06.025
  • Udoh IS, Kotonya G. Developing IoT applications: challenges and frameworks. IET Cyber-Phys Syst. 2018;3(2):65–72. doi: 10.1049/iet-cps.2017.0068
  • Janssen M, Luthra S, Mangla S, et al. Challenges for adopting and implementing IoT in smart cities: an integrated MICMAC-ISM approach. Internet Res. 2019;29(6):1589–1616. doi: 10.1108/INTR-06-2018-0252
  • Rane N, Choudhary S, Rane J. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT)-based sensors for monitoring and controlling in architecture, engineering, and construction: applications, challenges, and opportunities. 2023. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4642197.
  • Baharuddin MN, Bahardin NF, Zaidi MA, et al. Identification of critical factors and difficulties for industrialised building system (IBS) formwork in Malaysian construction industry–a literature review. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2015); Shah Alam, Malaysia; 2015. p. 1–5.

Appendix

A

Table A1. Major descriptive faces of the reviewed articles.

References

[1] A. E. Oke and V. A. Arowoiya, “Evaluation of internet of things (IoT) application areas for sustainable construction,” Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 387-402, 2021.

[2] F. K. Shaikh, S. Zeadally, and E. Exposito, “Enabling technologies for green internet of things,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 983-994, 2015.

[3] C. D. P. Martens, L. F. d. Silva, D. F. Silva, and M. L. Martens, “Challenges in the implementation of internet of things projects and actions to overcome them,” Technovation, vol. 118, p. 102427, 2022/12/01/2022, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102427.

[4] H.-I. Wang, “Constructing the green campus within the internet of things architecture,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 804627, 2014.

[5] R. Maqbool, M. R. Saiba, and S. Ashfaq, “Emerging industry 4.0 and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in the Ghanaian construction industry: sustainability, implementation challenges, and benefits,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 37076-37091, 2023.

[6] K. Khurshid, A. Danish, M. U. Salim, M. Bayram, T. Ozbakkaloglu, and M. A. Mosaberpanah, “An in-depth survey demystifying the Internet of Things (IoT) in the construction industry: Unfolding new dimensions,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1275, 2023.

[7] S. Dilakshan, A. Rathnasinghe, and L. I. P. Seneviratne, “Potential of internet of things (IOT) in the construction industry,” 2021.

[8] A. López-Vargas, M. Fuentes, and M. Vivar, “Challenges and opportunities of the internet of things for global development to achieve the united nations sustainable development goals,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 37202-37213, 2020.

[9] S. Wolfert and G. Isakhanyan, “Sustainable agriculture by the Internet of Things–A practitioner’s approach to monitor sustainability progress,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 200, p. 107226, 2022.

[10] I. Martínez, B. Zalba, R. Trillo-Lado, T. Blanco, D. Cambra, and R. Casas, “Internet of things (Iot) as sustainable development goals (sdg) enabling technology towards smart readiness indicators (sri) for university buildings,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 14, p. 7647, 2021.

[11] Y. Chen, X. Wang, Z. Liu, J. Cui, M. Osmani, and P. Demian, “Exploring Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Internet of Things (IoT) Integration for Sustainable Building,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 288, 2023.

[12] M. Thibaud, H. Chi, W. Zhou, and S. Piramuthu, “Internet of Things (IoT) in high-risk Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) industries: A comprehensive review,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 108, pp. 79-95, 2018/04/01/2018, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2018.02.005.

[13] V. Pospelova, I. López-Baldominos, L. Fernández-Sanz, A. Castillo-Martínez, and S. Misra, “User and Professional Aspects for Sustainable Computing Based on the Internet of Things in Europe,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 529, 2023.

[14] A. Gloria, C. Dionisio, G. Simões, J. Cardoso, and P. Sebastião, “Water management for sustainable irrigation systems using internet-of-things,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 1402, 2020.

[15] Q. Le-Dang and T. Le-Ngoc, “Internet of Things (IoT) Infrastructures for Smart Cities,” in Handbook of Smart Cities: Software Services and Cyber Infrastructure, M. Maheswaran and E. Badidi Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 1-30.

[16] M. Sharma, S. Joshi, D. Kannan, K. Govindan, R. Singh, and H. C. Purohit, “Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers of smart cities’ waste management: An Indian context,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 270, p. 122047, 2020/10/10/2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122047.

[17] E. Fantin Irudaya Raj and M. Appadurai, “Internet of Things-Based Smart Transportation System for Smart Cities,” in Intelligent Systems for Social Good: Theory and Practice, S. Mukherjee, N. B. Muppalaneni, S. Bhattacharya, and A. K. Pradhan Eds. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022, pp. 39-50.

[18] P. D. Gaspar, C. M. Fernandez, V. N. Soares, J. M. Caldeira, and H. Silva, “Development of technological capabilities through the internet of things (Iot): Survey of opportunities and barriers for iot implementation in Portugal’s agro-industry,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 3454, 2021.

[19] T. Song, J. Cai, T. Chahine, and L. Li, “Towards Smart Cities by Internet of Things (IoT)—a Silent Revolution in China,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1-17, 2021/06/01 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13132-017-0493-x.

[20] S. Narendran, P. Pradeep, and M. V. Ramesh, “An Internet of Things (IoT) based sustainable water management,” in 2017 IEEE global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC), 2017: IEEE, pp. 1-6.

[21] M. Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh, A. Keivani, R. C. Moehler, N. Jelodari, and S. Roshdi Laleh, “Internet of Things (IoT), Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Digital Twin (DT) in construction industry: A review, bibliometric, and network analysis,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1503, 2022.

[22] A. Salam, “Internet of Things for Sustainable Community Development: Introduction and Overview,” in Internet of Things for Sustainable Community Development: Wireless Communications, Sensing, and Systems, A. Salam Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 1-31.

[23] M. Gadre and C. Gadre, “Green Internet of Things (IoT): Go Green with IoT,” Proceedings of the ICIOT-2016, Zhangjiajie, China, vol. 4, pp. 1-6, 2016.

[24] D. Koo, K. Piratla, and C. J. Matthews, “Towards sustainable water supply: schematic development of big data collection using internet of things (IoT),” Procedia engineering, vol. 118, pp. 489-497, 2015.

[25] E. Benkhelifa, M. Abdel-Maguid, S. Ewenike, and D. Heatley, “The Internet of Things: The eco-system for sustainable growth,” in 2014 IEEE/ACS 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), 2014: IEEE, pp. 836-842.

[26] Z. A. Kazmi and M. Sodangi, “Modeling the constraints to the utilization of the internet of things in managing supply chains of off-site construction: An approach toward sustainable construction,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 388, 2022.

[27] R. Singh, A. Gehlot, S. V. Akram, L. R. Gupta, M. K. Jena, C. Prakash, S. Singh, and R. Kumar, “Cloud manufacturing, internet of things-assisted manufacturing and 3D printing technology: reliable tools for sustainable construction,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 7327, 2021.

[28] V. A. Arowoiya, A. E. Oke, C. O. Aigbavboa, and J. Aliu, “An appraisal of the adoption internet of things (IoT) elements for sustainable construction,” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1193-1208, 2020.

[29] O. S. Dosumu and S. M. Uwayo, “Modelling the adoption of Internet of things (IoT) for sustainable construction in a developing economy,” Built Environment Project and Asset Management, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 394-411, 2023.

[30] A. E. Oke, V. A. Arowoiya, and O. T. Akomolafe, “Influence of the Internet of Things’ application on construction project performance,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 2517-2527, 2022.

[31] A. Ghosh, D. J. Edwards, and M. R. Hosseini, “Patterns and trends in Internet of Things (IoT) research: future applications in the construction industry,” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 457-481, 2021.

[32] S. Tabatabaee, S. R. Mohandes, R. R. Ahmed, A. Mahdiyar, M. Arashpour, T. Zayed, and S. Ismail, “Investigating the barriers to applying the internet-of-things-based technologies to construction site safety management,” International journal of environmental research and public health, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 868, 2022.

[33] K. Ding, H. Shi, J. Hui, Y. Liu, B. Zhu, F. Zhang, and W. Cao, “Smart steel bridge construction enabled by BIM and Internet of Things in industry 4.0: A framework,” in 2018 IEEE 15th international conference on networking, sensing and control (ICNSC), 2018: IEEE, pp. 1-5.

[34] L. Kong and B. Ma, “Retracted article: Intelligent manufacturing model of construction industry based on Internet of Things technology,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 1025-1037, 2020/03/01 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-04369-8.

[35] I. H. Khan and M. Javaid, “Role of Internet of Things (IoT) in adoption of Industry 4.0,” Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, vol. 7, no. 04, pp. 515-533, 2022.

[36] Y. Mashayekhy, A. Babaei, X.-M. Yuan, and A. Xue, “Impact of Internet of Things (IoT) on inventory management: A literature survey,” Logistics, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 33, 2022.

[37] A. Malagnino, T. Montanaro, M. Lazoi, I. Sergi, A. Corallo, and L. Patrono, “Building Information Modeling and Internet of Things integration for smart and sustainable environments: A review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 312, p. 127716, 2021.

[38] S. Tang, D. R. Shelden, C. M. Eastman, P. Pishdad-Bozorgi, and X. Gao, “A review of building information modeling (BIM) and the internet of things (IoT) devices integration: Present status and future trends,” Automation in Construction, vol. 101, pp. 127-139, 2019/05/01/2019, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.020.

[39] N. Hossein Motlagh, A. Khatibi, and A. Aslani, “Toward sustainable energy-independent buildings using internet of things,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 22, p. 5954, 2020.

[40] S. M. Ali, M. A. Ashraf, H. M. M. Taqi, S. Ahmed, S. M. A. Rob, G. Kabir, and S. K. Paul, “Drivers for Internet of Things (IoT) adoption in supply chains: Implications for sustainability in the post-pandemic era,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 183, p. 109515, 2023/09/01/2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109515.

[41] D. N. Le, L. Le Tuan, and M. N. Dang Tuan, “Smart-building management system: An Internet-of-Things (IoT) application business model in Vietnam,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 141, pp. 22-35, 2019/04/01/2019, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.002.

[42] B. H. Mohammed, H. Sallehuddin, E. Yadegaridehkordi, N. Safie Mohd Satar, A. H. B. Hussain, and S. Abdelghanymohamed, “Nexus between Building Information Modeling and Internet of Things in the Construction Industries,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 20, p. 10629, 2022.

[43] K. Wang, Y. Zhao, R. K. Gangadhari, and Z. Li, “Analyzing the adoption challenges of the Internet of things (Iot) and artificial intelligence (ai) for smart cities in china,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 19, p. 10983, 2021.

[44] A. E. Varjovi and S. Babaie, “Green Internet of Things (GIoT): Vision, applications and research challenges,” Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, vol. 28, p. 100448, 2020/12/01/2020, doi: 10.1016/j.suscom.2020.100448.

[45] A. Israr, G. E. M. Abro, M. Sadiq Ali Khan, M. Farhan, and S. u. A. Bin Mohd Zulkifli, “Internet of things (IoT)-Enabled unmanned aerial vehicles for the inspection of construction sites: a vision and future directions,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2021, pp. 1-15, 2021.

[46] K. M. Alzubi, W. S. Alaloul, M. Al Salaheen, A. H. Qureshi, M. A. Musarat, and A. M. Alawag, “Reviewing the Applications of Internet of Things in Construction Projects,” in 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), 2022: IEEE, pp. 169-173.

[47] R. Ashima, A. Haleem, M. Javaid, and S. Rab, “Understanding the role and capabilities of Internet of Things-enabled Additive Manufacturing through its application areas,” Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 137-142, 2022/07/01/2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.12.001.

[48] D. Sarkar, H. Patel, and B. Dave, “Development of integrated cloud-based Internet of Things (IoT) platform for asset management of elevated metro rail projects,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1993-2002, 2022.

[49] C. de Villiers, S. Kuruppu, and D. Dissanayake, “A (new) role for business–Promoting the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals through the internet-of-things and blockchain technology,” Journal of business research, vol. 131, pp. 598-609, 2021.

[50] D. Pasini, S. M. Ventura, S. Rinaldi, P. Bellagente, A. Flammini, and A. L. C. Ciribini, “Exploiting Internet of Things and building information modeling framework for management of cognitive buildings,” in 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), 2016: IEEE, pp. 1-6.

[51] I. M. Hakim, M. L. Singgih, and I. K. Gunarta, “Critical Success Factors for Internet of Things (IoT) Implementation in Automotive Companies, Indonesia,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 2909, 2023.

[52] C. Z. Li, J. Hong, F. Xue, G. Q. Shen, X. Xu, and L. Luo, “SWOT analysis and Internet of Things-enabled platform for prefabrication housing production in Hong Kong,” Habitat International, vol. 57, pp. 74-87, 2016/10/01/2016, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.002.

[53] Y. Sun, H. Song, A. J. Jara, and R. Bie, “Internet of things and big data analytics for smart and connected communities,” IEEE access, vol. 4, pp. 766-773, 2016.

[54] S. Fang, L. Da Xu, Y. Zhu, J. Ahati, H. Pei, J. Yan, and Z. Liu, “An integrated system for regional environmental monitoring and management based on internet of things,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1596-1605, 2014.

Appendix

B

Figure B1. Major descriptive faces of the selected articles.

Figure B1. Major descriptive faces of the selected articles.

Figure B2. Distant monitoring structure.

Figure B2. Distant monitoring structure.

Figure B3. Remote controlling heavy-duty machines using IoT in the construction process.

Figure B3. Remote controlling heavy-duty machines using IoT in the construction process.

Figure B4. Monitoring safety using IoT at construction sites.

Figure B4. Monitoring safety using IoT at construction sites.

Figure B5. Water supply management at the construction site using IoT.

Figure B5. Water supply management at the construction site using IoT.