Feminism, generic ‘he’, and the TNIV Bible translation debate

Abstract

The publication of a gender-inclusive Bible translation, called Today's New International Version (TNIV), set off a controversy within the evangelical Christian community. This article argues that the opponents of the TNIV are using this issue to attack feminism in addition to critiquing the translation. First, this paper will outline the premise within the evangelical community that causes this translation to become such a critical issue. Second, it will articulate the translation theory behind the TNIV that created the current controversy. Finally, it will analyse the arguments against the TNIV in order to uncover patriarchal assumptions. In short, opponents of the TNIV defend the use of masculine generic pronouns by using unsubstantiated theological and linguistic arguments.

Keywords:

• TNIV
• feminism
• masculine generic pronouns
• Bible translation
• gender-inclusive language

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Marmy A. Clason

Received her M.A. in speech communication from Miami University and is completing a Ph.D. at Marquette University in gender studies. Her current research focuses on the relationship between organizational culture and sexual harassment. As an aviation enthusiast, Marmy plans to combine her interests by studying gender in the military with a focus on Women Airforce Service Pilots of WWII. Marmy has also been involved in the first-year experience movement, co-authoring two textbooks to support the success of college students.