189
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Pharmacokinetic considerations surrounding the use of levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in neurocritical care – an overview

, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 575-585 | Received 24 Mar 2022, Accepted 23 Aug 2022, Published online: 30 Aug 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of the most widely used anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in clinical practice. This is due both to a different mechanism of action when compared to other ASMs and its easy handling. Indeed, because of its interesting pharmacokinetic properties, it is often used outside of the labeled indications, notably in the neurocritical setting as prophylaxis of epileptic seizures.

Areas covered

A literature search was conducted and the most relevant studies on the pharmacokinetic properties of LEV were selected by two independent investigators. Current evidence on the use of ASM prophylaxis in the neurocritical setting was also reviewed, highlighting and discussing the strengths and limits of LEV as drug of choice for anti-epileptic prophylaxis in this scenario.

Expert opinion

LEV has a ‘near-ideal’ pharmacokinetic profile, which makes it an attractive drug for ASM prophylaxis in neurocritical care. However, current recommendations restrict ASMs prophylaxis to very selected circumstances and the role of LEV is marginal. Moreover, studies are generally designed to compare LEV versus phenytoin, whereas studies comparing LEV versus placebo are lacking. Further, randomized trials will be needed to better elucidate LEV utility and its neuroprotective role in the neurocritical setting.

Article highlights

  • Levetiracetam (LEV) is a widely prescribed anti-seizure medication with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile.

  • LEV is rapidly absorbed, and its excretion is purely renal. It is available both in intravenous and oral formulations, and it has few pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs.

  • Despite the extensive use of LEV as antiepileptic prophylaxis in the neurocritical setting supporting evidence is controversial.

  • Future randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the real effectiveness of LEV in this clinical scenario.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 727.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.