Abstract
In this paper, we highlight the need to explore the excessive significance given to the Paralympic Games as a vehicle for the encouragement of participation of people with a disability within sport. The media spectacle around the games that the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) has worked tirelessly to develop has become, for policy-makers and the public alike, a sufficient outlet for disability sport provision. The honourable goals of the IPC articulated through the ethos of Paralympism have been assumed to be valid for all people with a disability, yet in terms of widening participation, their utility is limited. This paper first illuminates the relationship between the International Olympic Committee and the IPC before we turn our attention to the ethos of Paralympism. Highlighting the necessity for ‘sport for all’, we use a human rights lens, aided by a capabilities approach to facilitate better ways to educate the public about the need for equality of access to sporting participation opportunities.
Notes
1. Throughout this paper we used the term ‘[dis]abled athlete’ because for us there is a double bind in the context of what is commonly referred to as disability sport. Convention within disability studies would advocate adopting a person first approach. In other words, the term for some should be ‘athletes with a disability’. Because society largely sees Paralympians as lacking ability, we turn the idea on its head encouraging our readers to exclude the [dis].
2. https://www.paralympic.org/the-ipc/about-us, viewed April 20, 2016.