440
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Gait-training devices in the treatment of lower extremity injuries in sports medicine: current status and future prospects

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 891-909 | Received 20 Aug 2018, Accepted 19 Nov 2018, Published online: 10 Dec 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: This review seeks to provide synthesized information on gait-training techniques and devices applied, in four of the most prevalent chronic lower extremity injuries seen in sports medicine.

Areas covered: Comprehensive searches were performed in CINAHL and PubMed databases in April 2018 to identify gait-training articles in Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI), Exercise-Related Lower Leg Pain (ERLLP), Patellofemoral Pain (PFP), and Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Reconstruction (ACLR) populations. An investigator reviewed the articles and extracted data including study demographics, gait-training techniques, devices used, and primary gait-training outcomes. Fifty-eight articles were included in this review (9 CAI, 19 ERLLP, 17 PFP, 13 ACLR). Pooled analyses were performed for common outcomes within each injury category. Current evidence supports destabilization training and pressure medialization tactics for CAI (n = 9), footstrike/loading and cadence interventions for ERLLP (n = 11) and PFP (n = 7), and limb off-loading techniques for ACLR (n = 4). Commonly used devices included accelerometers (n = 6), custom gait-training footwear (n = 9), metronomes (n = 14), and pressure sensors (n = 5).

Expert commentary: Although there are commonalities among gait-training interventions for chronic pathologies, more uniform approaches and clinical predictor rules would help identify the most appropriate interventions. Wearable sensors will continue to revolutionize gait-training and allow for ecologically valid gait-training interventions.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Supplemental material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 570.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.