Digital PET/CT with ¹⁸F-FACBC in early castration-resistant prostate cancer: our preliminary results

ABSTRACT

Background

We assessed the role of digital PET/CT (dPET/CT) with ¹⁸F-FACBC in patients affected by castration-resistant prostate cancer with PSA levels ≤ 3 ng/mL (early CRPC), no lesions detectable at cross-sectional imaging (CIM) and bone scan (BS).

Methods

Clinical data of patients submitted to ¹⁸F-FACBC dPET/CT were retrospectively reviewed. PET/CT results were analyzed: lesions’ number, location, and, in case of positive lymph nodes, largest node’s short axis (i.e. SA) were annotated. According to PET/CT’s results, patients with ¹⁸F-FACBC-avid lesions were further stratified into 1) unifocal; 2) oligometastatic (≤ 5 lesions); 3) disseminated (> 6 lesions).

Results

Twenty-four patients were enrolled. ¹⁸F-FACBC dPET/CT was positive in 21 out of 24 patients (87.5%). Thirteen patients (54.1%) showed recurrence in pelvic region, seven of whom with pelvic nodes’ involvement, while eight cases (33.3%) presented ¹⁸F-FACBC-avid metastases to extra-pelvic nodes or bone. Average SA of PET-positive nodes resulted in 8.9 ± 3 mm. Patients were categorized as unifocal in four cases (26.6%), oligometastatic in 10 subjects (66.6%) and disseminated in 1 case (0.6%). PET/CT impacted on clinical management in 14 cases (58.3%).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FACBC dPET/CT detected M1 status in 33.3% of early CRPC patients, significantly impacting on clinical management.

KEYWORDS:

• PET/CT
• nuclear medicine
• digital PET/CT
• precision medicine
• oncology
• ¹⁸F-fluciclovine
• prostate cancer

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewers disclosure

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Author contributions

L.F. designed the study, performed PET/CT analysis and wrote the paper; O.B. performed PET/CT and statistical analysis; O.S. reviewed and supervised the paper.

Additional information

Funding

The paper was not funded.