ABSTRACT
Introduction
Intraocular lens implantation in phakic eyes for the correction of refractive error is currently a widespread procedure. The EVO and EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lenses (ICL) are two of the most prevalent lenses implanted. They incorporate a central orifice to avoid the need for iridotomy. The main difference between both ICL is the higher optical diameter zone provided by the EVO+, allowing a better quality of vision at night. This review aims to provide an overview of the current ICL models available for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Areas Covered
During the last decade, more than 100 scientific papers analyzing the performance of EVO and EVO+ lenses have been published. This review describes the objective visual performance achieved with the implantation of central hole ICL lenses and the subjective perception of the patients implanted with these lenses. In addition, the safety and the potential complications associated with undergoing an EVO and EVO+ ICL implantation have been addressed.
Expert Opinion
Refractive surgeons and candidates to undergo ICL implantation should be aware of the excellent safety and visual outcomes provided by the implantation of central hole ICL lenses. However, future research could address minor issues currently not resolved.
Article highlights
EVO and EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lenses (ICL) incorporate a central hole to allow aqueous humor circulation avoiding laser iridotomy and reducing the prevalence of related complications.
The implantation of EVO and EVO+ ICL is a safe, effective, and predictable procedure widely used for the correction of myopia and myopia with astigmatism.
Dysphotopic phenomena could be perceived after ICL implantation although it is expected to progressively disappear during the medium postoperative period.
The ocular structures and lens integrity should be monitored in order to guarantee long-term safety on a yearly basis eye examination.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Reviewers Disclosure
One reviewer discloses being an investigator for Staar Surgical. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no other relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.