357
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Oral administration of hydroxylated-graphene quantum dots induces intestinal injury accompanying the loss of intestinal stem cells and proliferative progenitor cells

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1409-1421 | Received 15 Jul 2019, Accepted 11 Sep 2019, Published online: 07 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) have gained significant attention in various biomedical applications. The physicochemical properties of these nanoparticles, including toxic effects, are largely determined by their surface modifications. Previous studies have demonstrated high in vitro cytotoxicity of the hydroxylated GQDs (OH-GQDs). The focus of this study was on the intestinal toxicity of OH-GQDs. Briefly, C57BL/6J mice were given daily oral gavage of 0.05, 0.5 or 5 mg/kg OH-GQD for 7 days, and the indices of intestinal damage were evaluated. Higher doses of the OH-GQDs caused significant intestinal injuries, such as enhanced intestinal permeability, shortened villi and crypt loss. The number of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells also decreased dramatically upon OH-GQDs exposure, which also inhibited the Ki67+ proliferative progenitor cells. In addition, an increased number of crypt cells harboring the oxidized DNA base 8-OHdG and γH2AX foci were also detected in the intestines of OH-GQD-treated mice. Mechanistically, the OH-GQDs up-regulated both total and phosphorylated p53. Consistent with this, the average number of TUNEL+ and cleaved caspase-3+ apoptotic intestinal epithelial cells were significantly increased after OH-GQDs treatment. Finally, a 3-dimensional organoid culture was established using isolated crypts, and OH-GQDs treatment significantly reduced the size of the surviving intestinal organoids. Taken together, the intestinal toxicity of the OH-GQDs should be taken into account during biomedical applications.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the research staff and students who took part in this work.

Ethics approval

The mice study was passed through the laboratory animal welfare ethics review of Soochow University (201807A303).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81530085, 81472919, 81872546), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20181180), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) and Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 547.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.