523
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Randomized impact evaluation of education interventions: experiences and lessons from a reading to learn intervention in East Africa

, , , , &
Pages 430-451 | Received 14 Sep 2012, Accepted 23 Jun 2014, Published online: 07 Oct 2014
 

Abstract

This paper presents the experiences and lessons learnt during the design and implementation of the randomized impact evaluation (IE) of a reading to learn (RtL) intervention in early primary grades. The study was to assess the impact of RtL on literacy and numeracy among pupils in low-performing districts in East Africa. The intervention was designed in a way that in each country one district implemented an intervention package that included teacher training, and teaching and learning materials; while the other district implemented this same package with an additional parental involvement component. Baseline data were collected in mid-2009 in Grades 1 and 2, and in 2010 for the incoming Grade 1. The endline data were collected in mid-2011. A total of 119 treatments and 110 control schools participated in the study. The randomized design provided an opportunity to attribute causality and also qualitatively establish pathways through which the intervention impacted on learning. The paper provides lessons learnt and demonstrates how the challenges faced during the evaluation were addressed. Additionally, the paper shows how IE was utilized to provide robust evidence of what works thus enabling policy-makers to make decisions on sustainability and scale-up of education interventions.

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the important contribution of APHRC staff who participated at various stages of the development of this paper, including data collection and processing, as well as giving valuable comments during the internal review process. We are also grateful to our partners, the Aga Khan Foundation and the Ministry of Education for providing us with introductory letters to the District Education Officers and school head teachers. Last but not least, we are very grateful to the school principals, teachers and learners who participated in this study. However, the views presented in this paper are only of the authors and not necessarily shared by those mentioned.

Funding

This work was supported by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation through the Education Research Program at APHRC [grant number 2009–3230].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,063.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.