Publication Cover
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 14, 2019 - Issue 6
503
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Does timeframe adjustment of the Life Orientation Test-Revised assess optimism as a state?

, , , , , & show all
Pages 799-806 | Received 11 Jun 2018, Accepted 08 Dec 2018, Published online: 12 Feb 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Optimism is prospectively associated with superior health outcomes in cardiac patients, making it an attractive target for well-being interventions in this population. However, optimism measured by the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) has largely been considered a static, dispositional construct. Among 125 patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome who received a positive psychology intervention, we assessed the properties of a modified LOT-R that changed the timeframe of items from general dispositional statements to queries about ‘right now.’ We aimed to learn whether this modified LOT-R was more dynamic than the original LOT-R via administration of both instruments at three timepoints over the 16-week study period. Contrary to our hypothesis, this modified LOT-R showed no greater change in mean score or intra-individual variance than the original LOT-R over 16 weeks. This suggests that simply changing the timeframe of the LOT-R may not facilitate assessment of more state-like optimism in medical patients.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This research project was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute through grant [R01HL113272 (to Dr. Huffman)]. Time for analysis and article preparation was also funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute through grant [K23HL123607 (to Dr. Celano)] and [K23HL135277 (to Dr. Millstein)]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The sponsor had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or publication of the study. The authors have no other relevant conflicts of interest to report.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 351.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.