Publication Cover
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 19, 2024 - Issue 4
6,238
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Personal narrative and stream of consciousness: an AI approachOpen Materials

ORCID Icon &
Pages 592-598 | Received 02 Aug 2023, Accepted 16 Aug 2023, Published online: 14 Sep 2023

ABSTRACT

The personal narrative is a construct said to embody personal identity and so influence thought and guide behavior. Therapists and coaches draw on such personal narratives to explain maladaptive thoughts and to foster clients’ insights. We combined artificial intelligence (AI) with stream-of-consciousness to make the latent construct of personal narrative explicit. Adult participants (n = 26) contributed 50 stream-of-consciousness thoughts, which along with demographic details and our prompts, were processed by ChatGPT-4 to create a personal narrative. Participants evaluated these AI-generated narratives for accuracy, surprise, and insightfulness, reporting high accuracy, surprise, and increased self-insight. Twenty-five of the 26 participants rated the narratives as ‘Completely Accurate’ or ‘Mostly Accurate’,19 rated the narratives as ‘Very Surprising’ or ‘Somewhat Surprising’, and 19 indicated that they learned something new about themselves. This suggests that AI can support self-discovery in therapy and coaching.

Personal narratives – the stories we tell ourselves about our lives – may play a central role in identity and so influence our thought patterns and behaviors. This role of personal narratives has been a central theme in psychological theories including McAdams’s (Citation1985) life story model of identity and Habermas and Bluck’s (Citation2000) theory of autobiographical reasoning. These theoretical frameworks and decades of empirical research posit that personal narratives help individuals make sense of past experiences, perceive the present, and envision their future (Adler et al., Citation2016, Habermas & Köber, Citation2015, McAdams, Citation1985, Citation2008, Citation2018, Singer, Citation2004). As such, they are not just random stories, but a key component of human cognition.

The notion of personal narrative has taken hold in psychotherapy and coaching, too. Research in cognitive behavioral therapy and narrative therapy suggests that by helping individuals reinterpret their personal narratives, therapists can promote self-understanding leading toward healthier thought and action. Despite such benefits, working with personal narratives poses a unique challenge due to their inherent subjectivity, and latent, rather than explicit, structure.

Artificial intelligence

Despite the rise in artificial intelligence (AI) today, research and application within psychology are still developing in simulating human perception, self-knowledge, emotions, intentions, and desires (Zhao et al., Citation2022). Yet, its rapid advance offers a promising new avenue for the study of personal narratives.

To date, psychology has leveraged AI technology for evaluating psychological interventions, predicting clinical diagnoses, and recognizing affective states based on facial expressions (Zhao et al., Citation2022, Zhou et al., Citation2022). More recently, developments of large language models (LLMs) enable social science researchers to accurately simulate human behavioral responses and analyze complex relationships within language on a much greater scale than ever before (Grossmann et al., Citation2023).

AI’s capabilities enable pattern recognition of latent variables and thus make it a potent tool for studying personal narratives. By mining data for patterns, AI might make personal narratives explicit thereby streamlining their use in therapy or coaching. However, this path, to our knowledge, is yet to be walked.

Present study

We aimed to use AI to generate personal narratives from stream-of-consciousness data. We prompted ChatGPT-4 to process participant data and to generate individualized, personal narratives, which participants then evaluated for accuracy, surprise, and insight. By examining the capacity of AI to create meaningful personal narratives and to evaluate the impact of these narratives on our participants, we explored a new frontier at the intersection of psychology and AI. Our research advances the exploration of AI’s potential in psychological practice.

Method

Research participants

The participants, all aged 18 and above, were recruited via multiple methods. Students from the University of Pennsylvania volunteered through an online research portal offering research credits. All other participants were recruited via study advertising on authentichappiness.org.

Procedure

Each participant provided informed and explicit consent before first completing a demographic questionnaire in Qualtrics. Upon completion of this first survey, each participant received an email with detailed instructions to record 50 stream-of-consciousness thoughts over the course of 48 hours and upload the document to a secure cloud folder. We then gave a series of structured prompts to train ChatGPT-4 to generate a detailed, personal narrative for each participant. Once narratives were generated, additional prompts were then used in a new ChatGPT-4 session to ‘back-translate’ the narratives and produce 25 stream-of-consciousness thoughts that the individual, described in the generated narrative, might think. The prompt scripts used to generate the narratives and thoughts are included in .

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of participants.

Table 2. ChatGPT-4 prompts.

We then put each participant’s AI-generated narrative and AI-generated stream-of-consciousness thoughts into an individualized Qualtrics survey that was sent only to that participant. These second surveys asked each participant to rate the accuracy, surprisingness, and insightfulness of both the generated narrative and the AI-generated stream-of-consciousness thoughts. Participants were also invited to open-ended comment on the accuracy and insightfulness of these narratives.

Measures

The demographic questionnaire asked about age, gender, marital status and children, race, ethnicity, sexuality, education, employment, income, and religious beliefs.

In the second survey we asked individuals three questions to rate their AI-generated personal narrative: (1) ‘Overall, how accurate is this personal narrative?’ on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 – ‘Completely Inaccurate (this narrative sounds nothing like me’.) to 5 – ‘Completely Accurate (this narrative is a near perfect representation of me’.); (2) ‘How surprising was this narrative to you?’ on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 – ‘Very unsurprising’ to 5 – ‘Very surprising’.; and (3) ‘Did you learn something new about yourself or were you made aware of something about yourself after reading this narrative?’ with responses, ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. Additionally, we invited participants to answer two open-ended questions: (1) What elements or aspects of this AI-generated narrative were inaccurate or missing from the life story or personal narrative that you believe you have?”; and (2) ‘Please explain in a few words or sentences what you learned’. In this same survey, these questions were repeated for the 25 AI-generated stream-of-consciousness thoughts.

Although this was a convenience sample, 95 individuals, from 20 different countries completed the first survey, and approximately 33% (n = 31) of those individuals reported their stream-of-consciousness thoughts and therefore moved to the second stage. Of those 31 individuals, 26 completed the study. At this point, results were consistent, so we discontinued data collection. Of this final group (n = 26), the ages ranged from 18–79 years old and their mean age was 31 years old. Additional sociodemographic characteristics are presented in .

Results

The great majority, 96% (n = 25), rated the AI-generated personal narratives as either ‘Completely Accurate’ or ‘Mostly Accurate’. 73% (n = 19) rated the narratives as ‘Very Surprising’ or ‘Somewhat Surprising’, and 73% also (n = 19) indicated that they learned something about themselves from the narratives. shows these ratings.

Figure 1. Participant ratings of accuracy, surprise, and insight of the individual AI-generated personal narratives as a function of the degree of accuracy, surprise, and insight and the number of participants in each rating category.

Figure 1. Participant ratings of accuracy, surprise, and insight of the individual AI-generated personal narratives as a function of the degree of accuracy, surprise, and insight and the number of participants in each rating category.

For the reverse procedure, in which we prompted AI with the personal narrative and asked it to generate 25 stream-of-consciousness thoughts, 14 out of 26 of the participants rated these thoughts as either ‘Completely Accurate’ or ‘Mostly Accurate’, while 46% (n = 12) rated them as ‘Somewhat accurate/inaccurate’ or ‘Mostly Inaccurate’. Sixty-two percent of participants rated these thoughts as ‘Very Surprising’ or ‘Somewhat Surprising’; 23% rated them as ‘Neither Surprising nor Unsurprising’; and 15% rated them as ‘Somewhat Unsurprising’ or ‘Very Unsurprising’. Finally, 54% (n = 14) of participants reported learning something about themselves from these AI-generated thoughts, while 46% (n = 12) did not. These results are shown in and further summarized in . In addition, we included samples of participant’s open-ended responses commenting on the accuracy of the personal narratives and what they learned from the AI-generated streams-of-consciousness in .

Figure 2. Participant ratings of accuracy, surprise, and insight of the individual AI-generated stream-of-consciousness thoughts as a function of the degree of accuracy, surprise, and insight and the number of participants in each rating category.

Figure 2. Participant ratings of accuracy, surprise, and insight of the individual AI-generated stream-of-consciousness thoughts as a function of the degree of accuracy, surprise, and insight and the number of participants in each rating category.

Table 3. Descriptive statistics for study variables.

Table 4. Narrative examples and participant open-ended responses

Discussion

We found that ChatGPT-4 generated accurate personal narratives when prompted with participants’ stream-of-consciousness thoughts and basic demographic information. Most participants also reported being surprised by these narratives, indicating that this AI model drew out patterns from the data that had previously gone unnoticed or unacknowledged. A considerable number of participants reported gaining new self-insights from these AI-generated narratives, suggesting that AI can serve as a useful tool for self-discovery.

This has both theoretical and practical implications. By demonstrating that AI can generate narratives that align with individuals’ sense of self, our study confirms the reality of personal narratives in shaping identity (McAdams, Citation1985, Citation2008, Citation2018, McAdams & McLean, Citation2013, Murray, Citation2003). Furthermore, surprise and insight data suggest that AI can facilitate autobiographical reasoning (Habermas & Bluck, Citation2000), which plays a key role in personal development, identity exploration and stabilization (Habermas & Köber, Citation2015). There are causal implications as well: We reversed the process and fed AI personal narratives prompting it to generate stream-of-consciousness, and many of the participants rated the AI-generated streams of consciousness as accurate and surprising. This confirms that the hypothetical construct of narrative identity is, indeed, causal.

Beyond theory, the practical applications suggest new directions for AI-assisted psychotherapy and coaching. Understanding and modifying personal narratives to promote self-insight and well-being are key components of modern therapy and coaching (Crossley, Citation2000, Drake, Citation2007, Greenberg, Citation2004, Law, Citation2022, Parry & Doan, Citation1994, Zimmerman & Dickerson, Citation1996). Psychologists and coaches can use AI-generated personal narratives to help their clients gain perspective about their past and present in a positive manner – a cognitive skill that promotes well-being (Fredrickson, Citation2000, Godbee & Kangas, Citation2020, Nowlan et al., Citation2015, Seligman, Citation1990). We suggest that AI can support and build on traditional therapy and coaching methods, by providing clients, coaches, and therapists with new insights and further clients’ self-discovery.

While breaking new ground, this study has limitations. ChatGPT-4 is new and still evolving, and despite its advanced modeling, it does not yet capture the full range of emotion, context, and idiosyncrasy that shape personal narratives. Furthermore, the 50 stream-of-consciousness thoughts provided by participants, while rich, are biased toward current concerns. Current concerns represent only a fraction of mental life. However, these limitations provide directions for future research. Such studies should explore AI models other than ChatGPT, use thoughts that go beyond current concerns, use more diverse samples, explore predictors of accuracy, and use other evaluation methods to assess the adequacy of AI-generated narratives.

Overall, we were surprised by the results and we are encouraged by them. We believe AI’s ability to make personal narratives explicit marks a new departure for psychological research and practice.

Open scholarship

This article has earned the Center for Open Science badge for Open Materials. The materials are openly accessible at https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2257666

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Andrew Trousdale for his help with Chat-GPT-related methodology.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The participant stream-of-consciousness and narrative data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, APB. These data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of the research participants. The materials used to generate the narrative identities and stream-of-consciousness data are openly accessible at https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.13177.

Additional information

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or non-profit sectors.

References

  • Adler, J. M., Lodi-Smith, J., Philippe, F. L., & Houle, I. (2016). The incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well-being: A review of the field and recommendations for the future. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 20(2), 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315585068
  • Crossley, M. L. (2000). Narrative psychology, trauma and the study of self/identity. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354300104005
  • Drake, D. B. (2007). The art of thinking narratively: Implications for coaching psychology and practice. Australian Psychologist, 42(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060701648159
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health and well-being. Prevention & Treatment, 3. No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/1522-3736.3.1.31a
  • Godbee, M., & Kangas, M. (2020). The relationship between flexible perspective taking and emotional well-being: A systematic review of the “self-as-context” component of acceptance and commitment therapy. Behavior Therapy, 51(6), 917–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2019.12.010
  • Greenberg, L. S. (2004). Emotion–focused therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 11(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.388
  • Grossmann, I., Feinberg, M., Parker, D. C., Christakis, N. A., Tetlock, P. E., & Cunningham, W. A. (2023). AI and the transformation of social science research. Science, 380(6650), 1108–1109. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi1778
  • Habermas, T., & Bluck, S. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 748–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.748
  • Habermas, T., & Köber, C. (2015). Autobiographical reasoning is constitutive for narrative identity: The role of the life story for personal continuity. In The oxford handbook of identity development. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199936564.013.010
  • Law, H. (2022). Narrative coaching – part 1. In Coaching practiced (pp. 371–381). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119835714.ch40
  • McAdams, D. P. (1985). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. Dorsey Press.
  • McAdams, D. P. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story In O.P. John, R.W. Robins, & L.A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 242–262). The Guilford Press.
  • McAdams, D. P. (2018). Narrative identity: What is it? What does it do? How do you measure it? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618756704
  • McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413475622
  • Murray, M. (2003). Narrative psychology and narrative analysis. In Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 95–112). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10595-006
  • Nowlan, J. S., Wuthrich, V. M., & Rapee, R. M. (2015). Positive reappraisal in older adults: A systematic literature review. Aging & Mental Health, 19(6), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.954528
  • Parry, A., & Doan, R. E. (1994). Story re-visions: Narrative therapy in the postmodern world. Guilford Press.
  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1990). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. Knopf.
  • Singer, J. A. (2004). Narrative identity and meaning making across the adult lifespan: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 72(3), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00268.x
  • Zhao, J., Wu, M., Zhou, L., Wang, X., & Jia, J. (2022). Cognitive psychology-based artificial intelligence review. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 1024316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1024316
  • Zhou, S., Zhao, J., & Zhang, L. (2022). Application of artificial intelligence on psychological interventions and diagnosis: An overview. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.811665
  • Zimmerman, J. L., & Dickerson, V. C. (1996). If problems talked: Narrative therapy in action. Guilford Press.