470
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Perceptions of voluntary medical male circumcision among circumcising and non-circumcising communities in Malawi

, , , &
Pages 679-691 | Received 29 Sep 2014, Accepted 29 Dec 2014, Published online: 29 Jan 2015
 

Abstract

Three randomised controlled trials in Africa indicated that voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is an effective method to reduce a man's risk of becoming infected through sex with an HIV-positive female partner. The success of recent public health initiatives to increase numbers of circumcised men in Malawi has been very limited. We conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) with men, women and male adolescents from non-circumcising and circumcising communities in southern Malawi to better understand their beliefs about male circumcision and the promotion of VMMC for HIV prevention. Results revealed that beliefs about male circumcision, in general, are strongly mediated by Malawian culture and history. Participants have attempted to develop a new meaning for circumcision in light of the threat of HIV infection and the publicised risk reduction benefits of VMMC. Several study participants found it difficult to distinguish VMMC from traditional circumcision practices (jando and lupanda), despite awareness that the new form of circumcision was an expression of (western) modern medicine performed largely for public health purposes. Greater recognition of background cultural beliefs and practices could inform future efforts to promote medical male circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy in this context.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Chanizya Mulaba Mulambia and Treza Likomwa for their work during the data collection phase, and Dr Adamson Muula for his insights and advice. The researchers would also like to thank the research participants for their cooperation, engagement and time.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported in its entirety by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Center for AIDS Research, a National Institutes of Health-funded programme [grant number P30 AI50410].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.