712
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

South African women's conceptualisations of and responses to sexual coercion in relation to hegemonic masculinities

, &
Pages 135-152 | Received 20 Jun 2014, Accepted 09 Feb 2015, Published online: 21 May 2015
 

Abstract

Despite the documented relationship between hegemonic norms of masculinities and South African men’s use of sexual violence, less is known about how women’s engagement with norms of masculinity influences their agency in sexually coercive experiences. This study applied a narrative approach to assess how women’s understandings of hegemonic male norms affected their perceptions of and responses to sexually coercive experiences. Twenty-five sexual history narrative interviews were conducted with women across five South African provinces representing a range of ages, language and sociocultural backgrounds. Interviews elicited stories of first experiences of sex and the range of sexual relationships through adulthood. Data were analysed using principles of thematic and narrative analysis. Coercive sexual experiences informed many women’s normative ideas about men’s sexuality including being impulsive, controlling and aggressive. This could underpin women’s limited ability to exercise agency and their increased vulnerability to sexual abuse. Some women reported levels of trust and respect in subsequent relationships, which typically involved deconstructing norms of men’s use of coercion and moving beyond self-blame and guilt. The findings highlight the need to appreciate the fluid and situated nature of women’s agency from a relational perspective in terms of how women condone and challenge gender norms that support men’s use of sexual violence in their relationships.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants who were willing to share their intimate stories with us. We would also like to acknowledge CADRE (Center of AIDS Development, Research & Evaluation) for supporting early research implementation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Codes for Participant Referencing

CBAY = Coffee Bay, Eastern Cape

CPT = Cape Town, Western Cape

GTOWN = Grahamstown, Eastern Cape

JNB = Johannesburg, Gauteng

NELS = Nelspruit, Mpumalanga

PTZB = Pietermaritzburg KwaZulu-Natal

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by USAID through Johns Hopkins Health Education South Africa (JHESSA); University of Cape Town Research Associateship and Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.