Publication Cover
Global Public Health
An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 14, 2019 - Issue 5
1,028
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The use of participatory visual methods with community health workers: A systematic scoping review of the literature

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 722-736 | Received 30 May 2018, Accepted 16 Sep 2018, Published online: 23 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

With the need to design and evaluate Community Health Worker (CHW) programmes from a more human-centred perspective, researchers and programme managers are exploring the role of participatory visual methodologies (PVMs). This review identifies, maps, and assesses the quality of current literature that describes the use of PVMs with CHWs. It includes material from the grey literature and 10 major databases between 1978-2018. A Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative checklist was used to assess the overall quality of the included studies. 12 original studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were located in North America (n = 9) or sub-Saharan Africa (n = 3), with photovoice (n = 6) and digital storytelling (n = 5) being the most commonly used forms of PVMs. The overall quality of the evidence described in these articles was high, but it was notable that seven studies did not fully report the ethical considerations of their work. The studies revealed that PVMs can help assist CHWs’ reflective practice and understanding of complex health issues, as well as identifying key issues in the community to potentially leverage social action.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Catherine Scutt, the Bodleian Education Librarian at the Department of Education, University of Oxford for assisting us with the literature search strategy, and Professor Niall Winters at the Department of Education, University of Oxford for providing guidance for the discussion section of the manuscript. Finally we wish to thank the reviewers whose comments and valuable suggestions helped to strengthen our final manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

No specific funding was received for the completion of this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.