Publication Cover
Global Public Health
An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 14, 2019 - Issue 12
494
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A review of transactional sex for natural resources: Under-researched, overstated, or unique to fishing economies?

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1803-1814 | Received 22 Oct 2018, Accepted 16 May 2019, Published online: 26 Jun 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Environmental change is projected to decrease the availability of key natural resources. Decreasing availability of resources that support food security and livelihoods for vulnerable populations is hypothesised to increase engagement in transactional sex. Therefore, we systematically examined the peer-reviewed literature to characterise what is known about transactional sex for natural resources, document the natural resources that are exchanged for sex, and identify qualitative trends. Of the 1063 articles, 33 were retained for full abstraction. A majority of articles were published after 2005 (93%) and focused on Africa (90%). Two-thirds of articles focused on sex-for-fish exchanges. Reports of transactional sex were also found for other resources, including agricultural land (12%) as well as food, water, and fuel in emergency contexts (12%). Migration and altered resource availability were described as underlying causes of transactional sex. Some studies described an increased risk of sexually transmitted infection, including HIV, as a health consequence of transactional sex. We offer three possible explanations for why the preponderance of previous studies have focused on sex-for-fish rather than other natural resources, and suggest directions for future research.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided by Cornell University's Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future (to KJF). SLY was supported by K01 MH098902 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by Cornell University’s Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future (to KJF). SLY was supported by K01 MH098902 from the National Institutes of Mental Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.