180
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The metabolic role of prolactin: systematic review, meta-analysis and preclinical considerations

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 533-545 | Received 01 May 2022, Accepted 03 Nov 2022, Published online: 29 Nov 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Hyperprolactinemia has been proven to induce hypogonadism and metabolic derangements in both genders, while the consequences of prolactin (PRL) deficiency have been poorly investigated.

Areas covered

To systematically review and analyze data from clinical studies focusing on the metabolic consequences of abnormally high prolactin levels (HPRL) and low prolactin levels (LPRL). In addition, data from preclinical studies about underlying pathophysiological mechanisms were summarized and discussed.

Expert opinion

PRL contributes to providing the correct amount of energy to support the mother and the fetus/offspring during pregnancy and lactation, but it also has a homeostatic role. Pathological PRL elevation beyond these physiological conditions, but also its reduction, impairs metabolism and body composition in both genders, increasing the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular events. Hence, hypoprolactinemia should be avoided as much as possible during treatment with dopamine agonists for prolactinomas. Patients with hypoprolactinemia, because of endogenous or iatrogenic conditions, deserve, as those with hyperprolactinemia, careful metabolic assessment.

Article highlights

  • High prolactin levels are associated with worse body composition and glycometabolic profile

  • Restoring normal prolactin levels in patients with hypoprolactinemia ameliorates body composition and glycometabolic profile

  • Gender differences can interfere with elevated prolactin metabolic-related disturbances.

  • Low prolactin levels are characterized by worse lipid profiles, higher fasting glucose and higher risk of diabetes when compared to controls.

  • The clinical syndrome hypoprolactinemia is a new condition that needs further studies to define its pathological burden.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/17446651.2022.2144829

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funding.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 608.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.