138
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-Analysis

Lack of association between TNFA and TNFB polymorphisms and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis from 37 studies

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1083-1090 | Received 19 Dec 2021, Accepted 22 Aug 2022, Published online: 30 Aug 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Epidemiological studies about the association between genetic polymorphisms in TNFA, TNFB, and IFNG and the risk for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been performed extensively. However, the results are inconclusive. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the contribution of the polymorphisms in TNFA, TNFB, and IFNG to the susceptibility of MS.

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to identify relevant studies up to October 2021. A meta-analysis was performed, and pooled odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were computed using fixed or random effects models.

Results

A marginally significant association of the IFNG +874AT genotype with high risk of MS was observed in a heterozygous comparison (OR = 1.51, 95% CI, 1.02–2.23). However, no significant association between the TNFA (–308 G/A, – 238 G/A, and – 376 G/A) and TNFB +252A/G polymorphisms and MS risk was observed both in overall analysis and in subgroup analysis.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis provides evidence that the TNFA (–308 G/A, – 238 G/A, and – 376 G/A) and TNFB +252A/G polymorphisms were not risk factors for the occurrence of MS. Further studies with larger samples are necessary to reach the concise results about the contribution of other polymorphisms to the risk of MS.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reviewer disclosures

One peer reviewer declares consulting and nonbranded speaker fees from Accordant, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Horizon Therapeutics, Janssen, LabCorp, Mylan, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, TG Therapeutics, Viela Bio; and research support from Actelion, Alkermes, Celgene, CorEvitas LLC, Genentech/Roche, MedDay, NINDS, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no other relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Author contributions

X Han and J Gu designed the study. J Gu and J Sun drafted the manuscript. X Han revised the manuscript. Y Zhang and X Wang collected the original data. J Sun performed statistical analysis. L Fu, L Li, D Wang, X Wang, and L Yu assisted in the performance of the statistical analysis. All authors agree for the final version of the manuscript to be published.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2022.2117160

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Health Research Talents Project of Jilin Province [No.2019sc2018 and No. 20201SCI06], and Project of Development and Reform Commission of Jilin Province [No.2021C043-6].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 718.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.