China’s challenge to world development paradigms

ABSTRACT

The past forty years of world development have seen multiple operational frameworks, most notably, the neoliberal Washington Consensus or structural adjustment policies (1981–2001), the international development framework guided by the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDG, 2000–2015), and the Chinese Economic Model or Beijing Consensus emerging from Deng Xiaoping’s reforms (1978-present). I criticize the Washington Consensus as an economic, ethical-political, and environmental failure. I cast doubt both on the novelty and efficacy of the frameworks to enact the Millennium Development Goals by showing that they largely repackage structural adjustment policies in democratic terms and contribute far less to recent global successes than alternative Chinese and Indian models. I describe the Chinese Economic Model as both a far more successful domestic economic alternative to the hegemonic Western models and a problematic export with the potential to transform as well as to destabilize developing countries. Finally, I articulate conditions for an alternative that would enact the democratic rhetoric of the Millennium Development Goals, learn from the domestic scale of infrastructure and education spending, the national focus, local implementation, and recent environmental experiments of the Chinese Economic Model, and recognize the environment’s fundamental significance to development.

KEYWORDS:

• world development
• Africa
• China
• Bretton Woods
• the environment

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Joshua Rayman

Joshua Rayman is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of South Florida. A returned Malawi Peace Corps Volunteer, he is author of Kant on Sublimity and Morality (University of Wales and the University of Chicago Press), co-translator with Ryan Drake of Hans-Helmuth Gander, Self-Understanding and Lifeworld: Basic Traits of a Phenomenological Hermeneutics (Indiana University Press), and has published many articles including, The Specter of Liberation: Emancipatory Possibilities in the Political Theory of Marcuse and Žižek, Crossing the Epistemological Divide: Foucault, Barthes, and Neo-Kantianism, Entrenched: A Genealogy of the Analytic/Continental Divide, and Žižek's Ethics.