Abstract
This study utilizes Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) or Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) data to explore paternal, maternal and double orphaning in 38 sub-Saharan African countries. The analysis allows for inclusion of older adolescents (15–17-year-olds) and also looks at predictors of double orphaning. The data suggest a population rate of double orphans of 2.1% in sub-Saharan Africa. This is five- to 10-fold greater than in other regions. It also shows an increase over time, whereas other regions are reporting stabilization or decreasing rates. In the 38 sub-Saharan African countries, 26.8 million children (7.8%) were paternal orphans (3.5% in Niger to 16.7% in Lesotho) and more than 25.3 million (7.4%) were maternal orphans (2.6 in Guinea to 21.7% in Namibia). More than one in 50 children (2.1%) in these countries have lost both parents by 2010, with double orphans accounting for 12.4% (range 4.0–26.4%) of all children who had lost one or both parents. In multiple regressions, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence rates nine years earlier were the biggest predictor of subsequent double orphan rates. These figures clarify the size and diversity of the problem and also point to the imperative to define parental death accurately by recording maternal, paternal and parental death clearly and separately, and focus research and interventions appropriately. They also point out that in order to monitor the impact HIV/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) interventions on orphanhood there is a need for follow-up surveys which should take into account such confounding factors as differences in urban/rural sample design and “hidden” maternal orphans.
Notes
1. Convention on the Rights of the Child adopted the United Nations General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. Retrieved from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/pdf/crc.pdf
2. “Total” maternal orphan prevalence = –0.347507+ [0.785347 × (reported maternal orphan prevalence rate)] + (0.427062 × (prevalence rate of children living with neither parent, both alive) (R 2 = 0.71: p < 0.0001).
3. The 2001 adult HIV prevalence rates published in the 2010 UNAIDS Global Report were considerably lower than those published in the UNAIDS 2002 Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic.
4. True 2010 orphan prevalence rate = 0.002968 × 2001 adult HIV prevalence + 0.003408; R 2 = 0.854; p < 0.0001; paternal orphan 2010 prevalence rate = 0.046355 × adult HIV prevalence % in 2001 + 0.046355).
5. See footnote in .
6. According to the UNAIDS Reference Group (Technical Report and Recommendations, … February 2008), using the DHS data on orphans 0–14, the model for “dual” or true orphans was updated as a function of maternal and paternal orphan rates, “and several covariates which include the age of children, the HIV prevalence lagged by 5 years, women remaining single at ages 15–19 and the percentage of women in polygamous unions” (Technical Report and Recommendations, … February 2008).