Exercise science and the development of evidence-based practice: A “better practices” framework

Abstract

Exercise and sport scientists are increasingly faced with the need to demonstrate that their work is based on a sound evidence base and has an impact on professional practice and policy. This evidence is often derived from systematic reviews of rigorously designed studies such as randomized controlled trials. This paper addresses some of the limitations of the exclusive reliance on such trials and highlights the importance of addressing issues of effectiveness and practical concerns when synthesizing research evidence. The “Better Practices” model is then described in the context of a current project examining exercise and smoking cessation. This model provides one framework for integrating critical reviews of empirical evidence with contextual and practical considerations relevant to organizations interested in the translation of the synthesis into practice. Strengths and weaknesses of the model are discussed regarding its potential consideration and application by exercise and sport scientists.

Keywords:

• Better practices
• knowledge synthesis
• evidence-based practice

Acknowledgments

The writing of this paper was supported in part by a research grant funded through the strategic initiative Advancing the Science to Reduce Tobacco Abuse and Nicotine Addiction a partnership coordinated by the Canadian Tobacco Control Research Initiative (CTCRI). www.ctcri.ca