![Sample our Engineering & Technology journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5933/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Engineering-Tech.jpg"})
Abstract
The protective action of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been demonstrated in the context of surgical interventions in cardiology. Application of RIPC to sports performance has been proposed, but its effect on the electrocardiogram (ECG) during exercise remains unknown. This exploratory study aims to measure the changes in ventricular repolarization observed during exercise following RIPC in healthy subjects. In an experimental randomized crossover study, 17 subjects underwent two bouts of constant load exercise tests at 75% and 115% of gas exchange threshold (GET). Prior to exercise, they were allocated to either control or RIPC intervention with four cycles of 5 min of ischaemia followed by 5 min of reperfusion. ECG was continuously recorded during the protocol. QT and RR intervals were measured every 30 s (on an average tracing of the preceding 10 s). Although the time course of RR intervals did not differ between the two interventions (p = .56 at 75% GET and p = .74 at 115% GET), a significant shortening of QT intervals (measured from Q onset to T end) was observed during exercise (mean ± standard deviation of RIPC vs. control: −32 ± 19 ms at 75% GET (p < .001) and −34 ± 12 ms at 115% GET (p < .001)) as well as during recovery (−21 ± 8 ms at 75% GET (p < .001) and −16 ± 11 ms at 115% GET (p < .001)). This effect was not present at rest. These RIPC-related changes were clearly identifiable on the QT–RR loops after hysteresis reduction. RIPC therefore induces heart rate-independent shortening of QT intervals that is revealed during exercise.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the subjects who took part in this research and who have given their time, effort and availability. We appreciate the invaluable assistance of Yves Lalonde, MSc for his help in endorsement of the statistical analysis model, and we thank Aliciane Julien and Dr Raphaël Ricaud (Université de Paris Ouest) for their review of the article in English language.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.