7,732
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The sound of silence in association football: Home advantage and referee bias decrease in matches played without spectators

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1597-1605 | Published online: 29 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

The home advantage and unconscious referee bias are two well-documented phenomena in professional sports, especially in association football. Among the various factors determining them, the crowd noise is considered as one of the most relevant; yet, the majority of previous studies could not isolate its contribution. The possibility to study the effects of crowd noise – or, better, of its absence – in an ecological context was given by the matches played behind closed doors due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether home advantage and referee bias still occur (and to what extent) during matches played in absence of spectators. In particular, the focus was on the first and second divisions of the top four countries in the UEFA ranking, for a total of 841 matches behind closed doors. The hypothesis was that, if these phenomena are largely due to the effect of crowd noise, the absence of spectators should reduce their occurrence. Various parameters for each of the two phenomena were considered, and the analyses revealed a reduction of home advantage and the absence of referee bias. The results bring further support to the claim that, among all the factors contributing to home advantage and referee bias, crowd noise has a relevant role. Thus, spectators can significantly contribute to determine the dynamics and the outcomes of professional football matches.

Acknowledgments

We thank Alberto Mariconda, Geremia D’Orso, Silvano Suban, Marianna Giannusa, Francesca Bergamo, Lisa Bortolotto, Stefania Romano, Matteo Turci, and Veronica Vrhovnik for their precious contribution to data collection.

Ethical statement

The study reported in the present article does not involve any human participants.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here doi:10.1080/17461391.2020.1845814.

Data availability statement

The raw data are provided as supplemental material.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.