Correlation between economy/efficiency and mountain biking cross-country race performance

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the correlation between cycling economy (CE) and gross efficiency (GE) in Olympic cross-country mountain biking (XCO-MTB) race performance. Also was examined the correlation between CE, GE, and peak oxygen uptake (VO_2peak). Sixteen male XCO-MTB athletes (30.9 ± 5.2 years, 68.7 ± 5.6 kg, 175.0 ± 5.7 cm, and VO_2peak: 65.4 ± 4.9 mL·kg⁻¹ min⁻¹) completed two experimental sessions. On the first, anthropometric assessments and a maximal incremental test were performed. The maximal incremental test was performed in the cycle ergometer to determine VO_2peak, CE, and GE. A week later, an XCO-MTB race was performed in the second visit, where the official race time was used as a performance indicator. An inverse, significant moderate correlation was found between race time (8318.3 ± 459.0 s) and both CE (r = −0.53; CI_95% = −0.84 to −0.10; p = 0.0008), and GE (r = −0.67; CI_95% = −0.89 to −0.22; p = 0.0001). However, the moderate correlation between CE and race time showed low power. No significant correlation was found between VO_2peak and either CE (r = −0.45; CI_95% = −0.77–0.06; p = 0.08) or GE (r = −0.47; CI_95% = −0.78–0.04; p = 0.07). In conclusion, gross efficiency is an important component of XCO-MTB race performance. The VO_2peak was not related to CE and GE. The evaluation of GE may be a useful addition to the battery of physiological tests in mountain bikers.

Highlights

• The gross efficiency can be a performance indicator related to the Olympic cross-country mountain biking race;

• The cycling economy has a moderate association with race time, but its use as a measure related to Olympic cross-country mountain biking race performance should be carried out with caution;

• Despite VO_2peak’s influence on both cycling economy and gross efficiency measures, our results do not show a relationship with Olympic cross-country mountain biking athletes.

KEYWORDS:

• Assessment
• efficiency
• off-road cycling

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.