ABSTRACT
We introduce a method to measure the socially constituted strength of an insurgency and its state opponent as they compete for recognition as a governing body, based upon the four flows theory of the communicative constitution of organizations. We validate our method using a RAND data set of 30 recently concluded insurgencies, and find that our method not only predicts the ultimate victor in all 30 conflicts, but also refines previous analyses of the pattern of conflict by reducing the number of parameters necessary to forecast outcomes and grounding these observed trends in the intersection of organization and communication theories. Our results reveal the criticality of an organization maintaining an aura of cohesive structuring while avoiding to appear more oppressive than its opponent.
Disclosure statement
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Correction Statement
This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Kyle M. Schwing
Kyle M. Schwing is a recent graduate of the Individualized Interdisciplinary Ph.D. program at Virginia Tech.
Jason Spitaletta
Jason Spitaletta is a lecturer in the Department of Psychology at the Catholic University of America.
Jonathan Pitt
Jonathan Pitt is an adjunct faculty member of the Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering and an affiliate of the Intelligent Systems Division of the National Security Institute at Virginia Tech.