Over the last decade we have seen a rapid proliferation of simulation technologies and in the next ten years these will permeate almost every facet of cataract surgical training. Artificial intelligence, big data along with immersive tools are also key, and will complement enhancements to the present delivery methods.
Current high-fidelity virtual reality surgery simulators such as the EyeSi (VRmagic Holding AG, Mannheim, Germany) replicate the ergonomics and skills required for surgical practice, offering generic or task specific modules, and standardized scores which are repeatable, reproducible and correlate well with real life surgical skills. Simulator training provides improvements to surgeons’ operating room performance and shortens the learning curve [Citation1–Citation7]. An ever-greater array of simulated surgical complications and clinically challenging pathologies will be added and the future will also see the introduction of full cataract cases. User accounts, which can be remotely accessed, will allow easier monitoring but also teaching from afar.
Tactile feedback, reproducing that experienced in live patient surgery, is being developed using vibration and sensory substitution [Citation8]. Help Me See (HelpMeSee, New York, USA) is building a simulator for micro-incision cataract surgery, which provides this haptic feedback. The purpose of the simulator is to train surgeons in small incision cataract surgery in order to increase cataract surgical rates in low-resource countries [Citation9,Citation10]. Lower fidelity, wet and dry lab courses will also progress, as advances in material science and design improve the proprioceptive feedback, bio-fidelity and operating room (OR) integration of such systems [Citation11–Citation13]. These will run in parallel to simulators with augmented reality and visual overlay, introducing more realistic ‘intra-operative’ challenges such as bleeding, defocus or conjunctival chemosis.
Integration of 3-D viewing platforms into simulators (in addition to the fixed microscopic oculars) are also emerging [Citation14–Citation17]. These are occurring in parallel to OR developments such as the Ngenuity 3-D Visualization System (Alcon Inc, Fort Worth, TX, USA) and Trenion 3-D HD (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), which will allow for enhanced trainer-trainee viewing exchange, multiple potential participants, better physiological posturing and the possibility of remote mentoring [Citation18].
Virtual platforms have a wider scope for two-way exchange, with different forms of telecommunication or telementoring, which also exist with robotic surgical interfaces, both for pedagogical and delivery purposes [Citation19–Citation22]. These systems can display real-time information in the virtual space, for example OCT data, hazard alerts along with relaying preceptor instructions [Citation23]. The latter could include a video overlay demonstrating where to mobilize instruments or areas to avoid. Virtual interfaces may also be one gateway into ophthalmic robotics where additional degrees of freedom, stability and machine augmentation could be realized. Feasibility and proof of concept studies for robot-assisted cataract surgery [Citation24] penetrating keratoplasty [Citation25], corneal laceration [Citation26], pterygium surgery [Citation27,Citation28], and amniotic membrane transplantation [Citation29] have been demonstrated and as the field progresses tremor filtering, remote surgery and smart surgical tools (able to act as a virtual assistant) may all be added to improve performance and reduce error rates [Citation21,Citation30,Citation31].
Cognitive mentoring platforms, such as the Boston Virtual Mentor Cataract Surgery Trainer (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) provide online virtual reality simulation to practice surgical decision-making, error recognition and situational awareness [Citation32]. Much broader virtual reality based versions of these tools are emerging, some immersed in the 3-D virtual space, others allowing interactive team coaching and yet others prepping for high cognitive loading, with forward planning of the surgical procedure involving mind mapping (visually organizing the information in a hierarchical fashion). Web and App based surgical simulation, such as that provided by TouchSurgery (DigitalSurgery Inc., London, U.K.), can address this precise need both by providing free, interactive, touch-screen surgical content to improve comprehension and through mixed-reality (blended virtual and real) instruction via the HoloLens (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, U.S.). These allow the users to undertake the virtual operation with prompts and visual displays along with modular instruction on a step-by-step basis. Virtual/augmented/mixed reality will also be used to improve a student’s attention, satisfaction and motivation with the cataract surgical learning process enabling users to enhance skills and knowledge transfer, while immersive simulation technologies will also shape safety and human factors training (HFT) for surgery in the near future [Citation33–Citation36]. HFT has been piloted in ophthalmic surgery but is very expensive however virtual reality tech will allow individual and whole team mentoring in this domain accessibly and affordably [Citation37].
The availability of surgical training data through electronic portfolios, electronic medical records (both locally and more broadly e.g. the national ophthalmic database), and the digitization of other surgical data will make for much more powerful analysis in the future [Citation38]. The automation of objective structured rubrics e.g. the ICO-OSCAR:phaco and Machine Learning tracker algorithms will also allow real time challenges to be pinpointed, and targeted virtual reality tutoring shall stem from this [Citation39–Citation42]. Networked simulators will provide benchmarking and all this information aggregation will allow big data analytics with tailored virtual reality surgical instruction for the individual.
Building on previous Machine Vision work, Artificial Intelligence (AI) will also enter the fray. Deep Learning (AI) algorithms will be deployed for real-time analysis in theaters, with a range of generated metrics allowing more individualized training, targeting which aspects of performance require input [43-46Citation43,Citation44]. DigitalSurgery (Digital surgery Inc., London, U.K.), a software and content creator for surgical training, is developing such a system with Moorfields Eye Hospital and this will allow cataract complication risk estimation and reduction by providing pre and peri-operative case and surgeon specific data and alerts, interactive team training along with simulation cross fertilization. These offer new skills assimilation options for intermediate and advanced surgeons too.
Microsurgery is a highly technical skill, taking years to master in an ergonomically challenging environment (requiring all four limbs to function independently), all whilst using an indirect viewing platform [Citation45]. The backbone of current surgical education is still the mentor-apprentice Halstead model, and this will remain albeit with significant enhancements [Citation46]. Transformational changes to cataract surgical tutorage, and the virtual reality technology deployed to enhance it, will emerge in the near future [Citation47,Citation48]. Facilitated by accelerating developments in this sphere, these technologies will, in our opinion, offer a rapidly improved array of skills acquisition options, in a personalized fashion, delivered flexibly and remotely, reflecting a deeper understanding of modern learning theories.
Expert Opinion
High fidelity virtual reality simulators, which afford surgical skills transfer and replicate operative ergonomics, have proliferated over the last decade. In the near future technical simulation will be complemented by big data analytics of trainee and patient outcomes, artificial intelligence algorithms, interactive web and app-based platforms, immersive displays and real time data exchange systems, cognitive training and virtual mentoring to enhance the learning of surgery.
Declaration of interest
George Saleh was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.
Additional information
Funding
References
- Saleh GM, Theodoraki K, Gillan S, et al. The development of a virtual reality training programme for ophthalmology: repeatability and reproducibility (part of the international forum for ophthalmic simulation studies). Eye (Lond). 2013 November;27(11):1269–1274.
- Saleh GM, Lamparter J, Sullivan PM, et al. The international forum of ophthalmic simulation: developing a virtual reality training curriculum for ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 June;97(6):789–792.
- Privett B, Greenlee E, Rogers G, et al. Construct validity of a surgical simulator as a valid model for capsulorhexis training. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 November;36(11):1835–1838.
- Thomsen ASS, Smith P, Subhi Y, et al. High correlation between performance on a virtual-reality simulator and real-life cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 May;95(3):307–311.
- Thomsen ASS, Bach-Holm D, Kjærbo H, et al. Operating room performance improves after proficiency-based virtual reality cataract surgery training. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(4):524–531.
- Belyea DA, Brown SE, Rajjoub LZ. Influence of surgery simulator training on ophthalmology resident phacoemulsification performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 October 1;37(10):1756–1761.
- Tolsgaard M, Milenkovic M, Hadlaczky G Implementation of evidence-based simulation training. Ugeskr Laeger. 2019 September 16;181(38):V02190086.
- Virtual-reality cataract surgery simulator using haptic sensory substitution in continuous circular capsulorhexis. - PubMed – NCBI; [cited 22 Dec 2019]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Virtual-reality+Cataract+Surgery+Simulator+Using+Haptic+Sensory+Substitution+in+Continuous+Circular+Capsulorhexis.
- Kim Y, Jeong H, Park H, et al. Virtual-reality cataract surgery simulator using haptic sensory substitution in continuous circular capsulorhexis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:1887–1890.
- Singh A, Strauss GH. High-fidelity cataract surgery simulation and third world blindness. Surg Innov. 2015 April 1;22(2):189–193.
- Koetting SE, Qayumi AK, Cheifetz RE, et al. Teaching and evaluation of basic surgical techniques: the University of British Columbia experience. J Invest Surg. 1999 January 1;12(6):341–350.
- Henderson BA, Grimes KJ, Fintelmann RE, et al. Stepwise approach to establishing an ophthalmology wet laboratory. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 June 1;35(6):1121–1128.
- Ho BHK, Chen CJ, Tan GJS, et al. Multi-material three dimensional printed models for simulation of bronchoscopy. BMC Med Educ. 2019 June 27;19(1):236.
- Agranat JS, Miller JB, Douglas VP, et al. The scope of three-dimensional digital visualization systems in vitreoretinal surgery. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, N.Z.). 2019;13:2093–2096.
- Weinstock RJ, Diakonis VF, Schwartz AJ, et al. Heads-up cataract surgery: complication rates, surgical duration, and comparison with traditional microscopes. J Refract Surg (Thorofare, N.J.: 1995). 2019 May 1;35(5):318–322.
- Weinstock RJ., Operate with your head up. n.d., 2.
- Eckardt C, Paulo EB. Heads-up surgery for vitreoretinal procedures: an experimental and clinical study. Retina. 2016 January;36(1):137–147.
- BioPharma Dealmakers. Three-dimensional digital visualization for eye microsurgery. BioPharma Dealmakers, 2017 May 2. Available from: https://biopharmadealmakers.nature.com/users/37995-alcon/posts/16496-three-dimensional-digital-visualization-for-eye-microsurgery.
- Hallen P. Three-dimensional digital visualization for eye microsurgery. Medtech. 2017. Available from: https://biopharmadealmakers.nature.com/users/37995-alcon/posts/16496-three-dimensional-digital-visualization-for-eye-microsurgery
- Santomauro M, Reina GA, Stroup SP, et al. Telementoring in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2013 March;23(2):141–145.
- Ashlee L, Smith UA, Krivak TC. Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm. J Robot Surg. 2013 Juni;7(2):113–118.
- Hung AJ, Chen J, Shah A, et al. Telementoring and telesurgery for minimally invasive procedures. J Urol. 2018;199(2):355–369.
- Ehlers JP, Uchida A, Srivastava SK. The integrative surgical theater: combining intraoperative optical coherence tomography and 3D digital visualization for vitreoretinal surgery in the discover study. Retina. 2018;38(Suppl 1):S88–96.
- Bourcier T, Chammas J, Becmeur P-H, et al. Robot-assisted simulated cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(4):552–557.
- Chammas J, Sauer A, Pizzuto J, et al. Da Vinci Xi robot-assisted penetrating keratoplasty. Trans Vision Sci Technol. 2017 June;6(3):21.
- Tsirbas A, Mango C, Dutson E. Robotic ocular surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 January;91(1):18–21.
- Bourcier T, Chammas J, Becmeur P-H, et al. Robotically assisted pterygium surgery: first human case. Cornea. 2015 October;34(10):1329–1330.
- Bourcier T, Nardin M, Sauer A, et al. Robot-assisted pterygium surgery: feasibility study in a nonliving porcine model. Trans Vision Sci Technol. 2015 February;4(1):9.
- Bourcier T, Becmeur P-H, Mutter D. Robotically assisted amniotic membrane transplant surgery. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 February;133(2):213–214.
- Lendvay TS, Brand TC, White L, et al. Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 June;216(6):1181–1192.
- Santomauro M, Reina GA, Stroup SP, et al. Telementoring in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2013 Mar;23(2):141–145.
- Henderson BA, Kim JY, Golnik KC, et al. Evaluation of the virtual mentor cataract training program. Ophthalmology. 2010 February;117(2):253–258.
- Keller JM. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. J Instruc Dev. 1987 September 1;10(3):2.
- Serio ÁD, Ibáñez MB, Kloos CD. Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput Educ. 2013 October 1;68: 586–596.
- Fengfeng K, Lee S, Xinhao X. Teaching Training in a Mixed-Reality Integrated Learning Environment. Comput Hum Behav. 2016 September 1;62: 212–220.
- Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning | science; [cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available from: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/323/5910/66?casa_token=AK6jff0SJRkAAAAA:8MCxqsngL54V_x1QDm8oVrJ79qg3oArR3oyWUaNuK8sIi7_0yMSy0a4YuUjkt05Cohw7w26_7_vldZg.
- Saleh GM, Wawrzynski JR, Saha K, et al. Feasibility of human factors immersive simulation training in ophthalmology: the london pilot. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(8):905–911.
- NOD - National ophthalmology database audit; [cited 1 Jan 2020]. Available from: https://www.nodaudit.org.uk/.
- Smith P, Tang L, Balntas V, et al. “PhacoTracking”: an evolving paradigm in ophthalmic surgical training. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 May;131(5):659–661.
- Karl C, Golnik UA. Cataract surgical skill assessment. Ophthalmology. 2011 February 1;118(2):427–427.e5.
- Golnik C, Beaver H, Gauba V, et al. Development of a new valid, reliable, and internationally applicable assessment tool of residents‘ competence in ophthalmic surgery (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2013;111:24–33.
- Din N, Smith P, Emeriewen K, et al. Man versus machine: software training for surgeons-an objective evaluation of human and computer-based training tools for cataract surgical performance. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:3548039.
- Shafi Balal et al., ‘Computer analysis of individual cataract surgery segments in the operating room’, Eye (London, England) 33, no. 2 (2019): 313–19, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0185-1.
- Phillip Smith, Lilian Tang, Vassilis Balntas, et al. “PhacoTracking”: An Evolving Paradigm in Ophthalmic Surgical Training. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 May;131(5):659–61.
- Nizar Din, Phillip Smith, Krisztina Emeriewen et al. Man Versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons-An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical Performance. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:3548039.
- Tae Soo Kim et al., ‘Objective Assessment of Intraoperative Technical Skill in Capsulorhexis Using Videos of Cataract Surgery’, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 14, no. 6 (June 2019): 1097–1105, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-01956-8.
- Sugand K, Mawkin M, Gupte C. Validating touch surgeryTM: a cognitive task simulation and rehearsal app for intramedullary femoral nailing. Injury. 2015 November 1;46(11):2212–2216.
- Validation of surgical simulators | Journal of Endourology; [cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/end.2007.9985?casa_token=dM-Mb9TBRSEAAAAA:Wuiaoi-8W7_bAKSKS-X5CSeqqjJNtd9HpK5-t92T1mkvFnJmfKYwSHYt_ibVKUB7hc9v0YxOHf6Gk1A.