Spatial memory and explicit knowledge: An effect of instruction on representational momentum

Abstract

Freyd (1987; Finke & Freyd, 1985) suggested that representational momentum (i.e., forward displacement in memory for the location of a moving target) is impervious to error feedback (i.e., is modular or cognitively impenetrable), but studies supporting this claim might not have allowed sufficient opportunity for learning to occur. In the experiment reported here, participants were (a) naïve regarding representational momentum, (b) informed about representational momentum but not instructed to counteract it, or (c) informed about representational momentum and instructed to counteract it. All participants exhibited significant displacement. However, participants informed about representational momentum exhibited less forward displacement than did naïve participants due to a greater tendency to respond same to probes behind the true–same position. Possible mechanisms of compensation and the notion that displacement reflects both modular (cognitively impenetrable) and nonmodular (cognitively penetrable) components are addressed.

Keywords:

• Representational momentumtion
• Displacement
• Modularity
• Cognitive penetrability
• Naïve physics

Notes

¹ According to Amorim et al. (2000), semantic knowledge might also induce different cognitive sets (e.g., body imagery vs. pictorial imagery).