The influence of goal-state access cost on planning during problem solving

Abstract

Two problem-solving experiments investigated the relationship between planning and the cost of accessing goal-state information using the theoretical framework of the soft constraints hypothesis (Gray & Fu, 2004; Gray, Simms, Fu, & Schoelles, 2006). In Experiment 1, 36 participants were allocated to low, medium, and high access cost conditions and completed a problem-solving version of the Blocks World Task. Both the nature of planning (memory based or display based) and its timing (before or during action) changed with high goal-state access cost (a mouse movement and a 2.5-s delay). In this condition more planning before action was observed, with less planning during action, evidenced by longer first-move latencies, more moves per goal-state inspection, and more short (≤0.8 s) and long (>8 s) “preplanned” intermove latencies. Experiment 2 used an eight-puzzle-like transformation task and replicated the effect of goal-state access cost when more complex planning was required, also confirmed by sampled protocol data. Planning before an episode of move making increased with higher goal-state access cost, and planning whilst making moves increased with lower access cost. These novel results are discussed in the context of the soft constraints hypothesis.

Keywords:

• Adaptive cognition
• Human problem solving
• Human planning
• Human memory
• Information access cost

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the UK Data and Information Fusion Defence Technology Centre. The task and Experiment 1 were designed in collaboration with Andrew Howes, Cardiff University (now at University of Manchester). We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Joanna Barrett in transcribing and coding the verbal protocols generated in Experiment 2.