254
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular articles

Context-specific control in the single-prime negative-priming procedure

&
Pages 887-910 | Received 17 Jun 2011, Accepted 27 Sep 2011, Published online: 06 Jan 2012
 

Abstract

The current paper examines the applicability of the context-specific control principle to the probe selection dependence of negative-priming effects using the single-prime procedure. In a series of experiments, we highlight the applicability of the context-specific control principle, first by illustrating a key result that implicates the role of context-specific control and challenges the contextual similarity principle. Following this, we show the importance of distinct probe contexts in the single-prime negative-priming procedure and report a novel finding that illustrates a learning effect that can occur within an experimental session. Finally, we test the relation of our novel learning effect to a related learning proposal offered by Frings and Wentura (2006), and we demonstrate that the learning involved in context-specific control is not dependent on contingency learning. Overall, the patterns of results highlight the role of context-sensitive memory in controlling how current perception and action are integrated with prior experience.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant awarded to B.M. and by an NSERC CGS doctoral scholarship to M.C.D.

Notes

1 Given our interest in the effect of learning in the context of priming effects, we analysed the effect of repetition on low-selection probes in the second half of the experimental session. This analysis revealed a significant effect of repetition, F(1, 13) = 4.86, MSE = 2,493.526, p = .046. Participants responded 21 ms faster for repeated than for not-repeated trials; that is, a significant positive-priming effect was measured.

2 This F-test is equivalent to a one-sample t test for the 10-ms repetition effect being significantly different from zero. Given our specific a priori prediction, a one-tailed test seems appropriate.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.