288
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Neural processing of equitable and inequitable distributions in 5-year-old children

ORCID Icon &
Pages 584-599 | Received 10 Jun 2020, Published online: 16 Nov 2020
 

ABSTRACT

This study aimed at investigating the neurocognitive correlates of the perception and evaluation of equitable and inequitable distributions in five-year-old children. Children observed one character distributing toys or candies between two recipients. One of the recipients already possessed many resources, and the other possessed just a few. We used event-related potentials to compare brain activity elicited by equitable (the poor receives more) and inequitable (the rich receives more) distribution. On a behavioral level, children evaluated inequitable distribution as worse than equitable and considered the distributor as mean and worthy of punishment when she distributed inequitably as compared to equitably. On the neural level, we expected to find a MFN effect between 250 and 350 ms after picture onset. Instead, we found a frontal positivity (P2), which was greater for inequitable vs. equitable distributions, indicating greater saliency and attentional capture. This was followed by marginally significant greater positivity for equitable distributions between 600 and 1000 ms after picture onset (LPP), which indicates greater allocation of processing resources. Furthermore, a greater LPP was associated with more extreme evaluations for both conditions. This suggests that the more resources children invest in processing the distribution, the more they endorse equity and condemn inequity.

Acknowledgments

We thank Corinna Köck and Abhilasha Boruah for their help preparing the stimulus material, Victoria Licht for helping piloting the study, and also Afton Nelson together with Sanofer Abdul Salaam for her help editing the draft.

MP has been supported by a Fellowship from the Jacobs Foundation (JRF 2016 1217 12).

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflicting interests.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Jacobs Foundation [JRF 2016 1217 12]

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 169.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.