2,244
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-analysis

Outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19 patients compared to the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1347-1354 | Received 06 Dec 2020, Accepted 20 Apr 2021, Published online: 05 May 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often leads to mortality. Outcomes of patients with COVID-19-related ARDS compared to ARDS unrelated to COVID-19 is not well characterized.

Areas covered

We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and MedRxiv 11/1/2019 to 3/1/2021, including studies comparing outcomes in COVID-19-related ARDS (COVID-19 group) and ARDS unrelated to COVID-19 (ARDS group). Outcomes investigated were duration of mechanical ventilation-free days, intensive care unit (ICU) length-of-stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mortality. Random effects models were fit for each outcome measure. Effect sizes were reported as pooled median differences of medians (MDMs), mean differences (MDs), or odds ratios (ORs).

Expert opinion

Ten studies with 2,281 patients met inclusion criteria (COVID-19: 861 [37.7%], ARDS: 1420 [62.3%]). There were no significant differences between the COVID-19 and ARDS groups for median number of mechanical ventilator-free days (MDM: −7.0 [95% CI: −14.8; 0.7], p = 0.075), ICU LOS (MD: 3.1 [95% CI: −5.9; 12.1], p = 0.501), hospital LOS (MD: 2.5 [95% CI: −5.6; 10.7], p = 0.542), or all-cause mortality (OR: 1.25 [95% CI: 0.78; 1.99], p = 0.361). Compared to the general ARDS population, results did not suggest worse outcomes in COVID-19-related ARDS.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Karl Holub, Stephen Mead, and Darian Lehmann-Plantenberg for their design and support of the Nested Knowledge meta-analytical software.

Declaration of interest

NLR, SK, JR, AB, MS, DS, and KC work for Nested Knowledge and Superior Medical Experts. KWE, GP, ARD, and MA. JCT is employed by and has ownership interest in Superior Medical Experts. KMK works for and holds equity in Nested Knowledge and Superior Medical Experts. JMP is employed by and has ownership interest in Nested Knowledge and Superior Medical Experts. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Data availability statement

Additional data not contained in the article is available upon reasonable request.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 362.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.