ABSTRACT
Objectives: There are no comparative studies between patients belonging to the first and second waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the virus triggering coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the clinical characteristics and the short-term outcomes of two groups of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) belonging to two different waves of the pandemic. Methods: We analyzed 97 consecutive patients from 11 March 2020 to 31 May 2020 and 52 consecutive patients from 28 August 2020 to 15 October 2020. Results: Patients belonging to the second wave were younger, had a lower number of concomitant chronic conditions (multimorbidity), and had a milder clinical phenotype. Medical treatments and respiratory support use have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on different laboratory results and disease clinical features. Patients in the second wave had better short-term clinical outcomes, with lower death rates and more step-down transfers to a general ward. Conclusion: The present findings show a clear phenotypic difference in patients hospitalized at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. These results can help to stratify clinical risk and to better tailor medical treatments and respiratory support for patients with ARDS and COVID-19 pneumonia.
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Since the beginning of the pandemic, the study of phenotypic manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus triggering coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has aroused great interest. Different ‘waves’ of the spread of the virus can be recognized, with phases of intense viral diffusion alternating with phases of reduction of infections. Nevertheless, there are no comparison studies between patients belonging to the first and second waves. In the present study, we analyzed the different demographic, clinical, and prognostic characteristics of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) admitted to our intermediate Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU) during these two different periods of the pandemic.
We analyzed the different clinical characteristics and the short-term outcomes of 97 consecutive patients from 11 March 2020 to 31 May 2020 and 52 consecutive patients from 28 August 2020 to 15 October 2020. Laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS belonging to the second wave were younger, had a lower number of concomitant chronic conditions (multimorbidity), and a milder clinical phenotype. Furthermore, medical treatments and respiratory support use have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to different laboratory results and clinical features of the disease. Finally, patients in the second wave had better short-term clinical outcomes, with a lower death rate and more step-down transfers to GW.
In the Italian intermediate RICU, there was a clear phenotypic difference in patients hospitalized at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. The present findings can help to stratify clinical risk and to better tailor medical treatments and respiratory support for patients with ARDS and COVID-19 pneumonia.
Abbreviations
SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019
ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome
CT: computed tomography; RICU: Respiratory Intensive Care Unit
ICU: Intensive Care Unit
PaO2/FiO2: arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ratio
FWG: First Wave Group
SWG: Second Wave Group; NIV: noninvasive ventilation
HFOT: high-flow oxygen therapy
BPAP: bilevel positive airway pressure
CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure
IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation
ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme
LMWH: low molecular weight heparin
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all the participants from this study.
Authors’ Contributions
Conception and design of the study: A. Portacci, G.E. Carpagnano, V. Solfrizzi, F. Panza, and O. Resta. Collection of data: M.G. Tummolo, C. Ssantomasi, L. Palma, D. Fasano, and M. Lozupone. Analyzed the data: V. Solfrizzzi. Wrote the manuscript: A. Portacci, G.E. Carpagnano, F. Panza, and O. Resta. Final supervision and guarantee of the paper: G.E. Carpagnano, F. Panza, and O. Resta.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval was obtained through the Institutional Review Board and all patients provided consent to participate.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.