248
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparing modelling performance of chemometric methods for wood discrimination by near infrared spectroscopy

ORCID Icon
Pages 422-433 | Received 12 Nov 2021, Accepted 05 Feb 2022, Published online: 23 Feb 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Comparative wood anatomy is the most accepted (traditional) method for wood identification. However, there is an ongoing search for an effective method where traditional methods may be insufficient in distinguishing on the species level. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is one of the developing methods for wood identification. Near-infrared data of Scots pine, black pine, sessile oak and Hungarian oak were collected and examined in the spectral range of 12,000–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1. Data were analyzed by partial least squares discriminate analysis (PLS-DA), decision trees (DT), artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machines (SVM). Raw data were subjected to multiple scatter correction (MSC), standard normal variate (SNV), Savitzky–Golay for derivatives (first [FD], second [SD]) and smoothing (Sm) and combinations of these preprocessing methods (Sm + FD, Sm + SD, FD + MSC, FD + SNV). Model performance compared through test accuracies. Accuracies varied between 99–100%, 76–98% and 73–96%, for genus level, oak and pine species, respectively. PLS-DA and SVM were found the most successful models. This study revealed that it is possible to discriminate Scots pine from black pine, and sessile oak from Hungarian oak by near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis.

Acknowledgements

NIR spectra were collected by Antaris FT-NIR Analyzer (Thermo Nicolet Scientific, USA) at the Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, USA. The data of this study was obtained from the PhD thesis (Tuncer Citation2020) entitled “Utilization of near infrared spectroscopy in wood identification”. The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in “figshare” at http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16973101.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by International Doctoral Research Fellowship Program from TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of TURKEY) 2214-A [grant number 1059B141800316].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 182.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.