Abstract
Purpose of the Article: To (1) summarise the personal and clinical characteristics of persons with disabilities (PwDs) in the US who were evaluated for mobility assistive equipment (MAE) in the functional mobility assessment and uniform dataset (FMA/UDS) and (2) stratify subpopulations of PwD who reported falling versus those who do not report a fall.
Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective, descriptive cohort analysis of adults with disabilities using the FMA/UDS. Data are collected during a user’s initial evaluation for a new mobility device. The sample is intentionally general to be inclusive of all mobility device users. The primary variable of interest was a patient-reported fall within the 3 months leading up to their evaluation for a new mobility device. Subpopulation characteristics were stratified by this binary fall variable.
Results and Conclusions: This study provides descriptions of PwDs being evaluated for a new mobility device. There were 11,084 PwDs with 31 different primary diagnoses. During their new mobility device evaluation, 52.2% of PwDs reported at least one fall in the last 3 months. For those who reported a fall, 46.6% of PwDs were using a walking aid or no device at all before the new mobility device evaluation. Additionally, persons with progressively acquired disabilities (i.e., Parkinson’s disease, osteoarthritis and cardiopulmonary disease) reported higher rates of falls than those with congenital disabilities (i.e., cerebral palsy and spina bifida). These findings will influence future studies comparing different types of devices and their influence on falls and user satisfaction.
52.2% of persons with disabilities (PwDs) seeking a new wheelchair evaluation reported at least one fall in the last 3 months.
Persons with progressively acquired disabilities (i.e., Parkinson’s disease, osteoarthritis and cardiopulmonary disease) reported higher rates of falls than those with congenital disabilities (i.e., cerebral palsy and spina bifida).
Earlier interventions for fall prevention including professional wheelchair evaluations may be warranted, but further research is necessary to explore long-term effectiveness.
Implications for rehabilitation
Disclosure statement
Dr. Schmeler reports grants from Van G. Miller Group/U.S. Rehab during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Functional Mobility Assessment Royalties outside the submitted work.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Corey Morrow
Corey Morrow is an Assistant Professor at the Medical University of South Carolina. His primary research goal is to improve patients’ access to rehabilitation care and technology.
Richard Schein
Richard Schein is a Research Health Scientist within the Department of Rehabilitation Science & Technology at the University of Pittsburgh. Schein serves as an investigator and manager in the conduct of research projects, coordinating projects & budgets, and day-to-day operations.
Gede Pramana
Gede Pramana is a data scientist and works on several projects within the Department of Rehabilitation Science & Technology at the University of Pittsburgh.
Christine McDonough
Christine McDonough is an assistant professor in the Department of Physical Therapy and in Orthopaedic Surgery. Her primary areas of research include the development and testing of patient-centered outcome measures using item response theory, and clinical and health services research in fall and fracture prevention.
Mark Schmeler
Mark Schmeler is the vice chair for education & training in the Department of Rehabilitation Science & Technology at the University of Pittsburgh. Schmeler has 30 years of clinical experience and continues to practice as an Occupational Therapist and Assistive Technology Professional in the Center for Assistive Technology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.