478
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Lidocaine dose-response effect on postoperative cognitive deficit: meta-analysis and meta-regression

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 361-371 | Received 30 Sep 2017, Accepted 05 Jan 2018, Published online: 19 Jan 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The true influence of the perioperative intravenous lidocaine on the development of postoperative cognitive deficit (POCD) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains controversial. The principal aim is to undertake a meta-regression to determine whether moderator variables mediate the relationship between lidocaine and POCD.

Areas covered: We searched the Web of Science, PubMed database, Scopus and the Cochrane Library database (up to June 2017) and systematically reviewed a list of retrieved articles. Our final review includes only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared infusion of lidocaine and placebo during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Mantel–Haenszel risk ratio (MH RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to report the overall effect and meta-regression analysis. A total of 688 patients in five RCTs were included. POCD occurred in 34% of all cases. Perioperative lidocaine reduces POCD (MH RR 0.702 (95% CI: 0.541–0.909). Younger age, male gender, longer CPB and higher concentration of lidocaine significantly mediate the relationship between lidocaine and POCD in favour of the neuroprotective effect of lidocaine.

Expert commentary: The neuroprotective effect of lidocaine on POCD is consistent in spite of longer CPB time. A higher concentration of lidocaine strengthened the neuroprotective effect of lidocaine.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 362.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.