ABSTRACT
The study analyzes the editorial position of the Brazilian and foreign press in the coverage of Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment trial. By a framing analysis, we aim to understand how the national quality newspapers such as Folha de S. Paulo, O Estado de S. Paulo, O Globo, and the international ones as Público, El País, The Guardian, Le Monde and The New York Times organize the events and construct the respective political narratives, verifying the similarities and differences in the interpretation of the political crisis that led to the removal of the first female president of Brazil.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
ORCID
Liziane Guazina http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4765-6918
Hélder Prior http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8971-3469
Bruno Araújo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8288-2718
Notes
1. We emphasize Kuypers’ (Citation2010) understanding that the framings are used strategically in function of certain persuasion objectives. That is, as a discursive construction that generates certain effects (Mendonça and Simões Citation2012).