2,995
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

#metoo 2.0 to #meNOmore: Analysing Western Reporting About Sexual Violence in the Music Industry

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 191-207 | Published online: 13 Oct 2019
 

ABSTRACT

In October 2017, #metoo 2.0 reinforces the gendered sexual violence in the creative sector [Marghitu, Citation2018. “It’s Just art: Auteur Apologism in the Post-Weinstein era”, Feminist Media Studies, 18(93): 491–494] Building on this movement, on 11 November that year, 2912 women “testified about the situation in the Swedish music industry”, signing an open letter condemning sexual violence [Nyheter, 2017. “2192 Women in the Swedish Music Industry Behind Appeal Against Sexism.” Dagens Nyheter, November 17. https://www.dn.se/kultur-noje/2192-women-in-the-swedish-music-industry-behind-appeal-against-sexism/]. After the Swedish initiative, on 12 December 2017, the #meNOmore hashtag was established by 1000 women who signed an open letter to the Australian music industry speaking out against similar behaviour [Whyte, Citation2017a. “Artists Speak Out Against Sexual Harassment in the Music Industry.” AM – ABC Radio, December 13. https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/am/sexual-harassment-in-the-music-industry/9253956]. Using a content analysis framework, this study examines the media framing of 26 stories about #meNOmore by the Western press from 22 November 2017 (height of the Swedish campaign) to 21 December 2017 (a week after the hashtag surfaced in Australia). Research from journalism studies and musicology highlights that sexual violence is historically engrained in the media and music industries. However, findings from our study of the first month’s coverage of the #meNOmore content analysis in 2017 reveal that media reports about women and sexual violence were framed around addressing gender inequality and systemic structural issues in the music industry. This raises the question, has the media has turned a corner when covering sexual violence in the post #metoo era?

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 The press that were analysed included Daily Mail (Mail on Sunday, Mail Online), Daily Mirror (Sunday Mirror/Mirror Online/The People); Daily Star, Express (Express on Sunday), The Sun, The Independent; The Guardian, The Observer, the Telegraph Sunday; The Times (Sunday Times/Style).

2 The press that were analysed included The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune, Slate, Fox News, New York Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, CNN, Forbes, ABC News, The Atlantic Financial Times, Vanity Fair, Los Angeles Times, NBC News, The Baltimore Sun, The Hollywood Reporter, USA Today, NPR.

Additional information

Funding

Dr Andrea Baker’s contribution was supported by the Outside Studies Program at Monash University.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 315.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.