![Sample our Humanities journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5939/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Humanities.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Truthfulness is the lifeblood of news. However, fake news, like a wide-spreading virus, is infecting the global journalism. Taking China’s top fake news from 2001 to 2019 as an example, the study endorses a social pathological approach to address the symptoms, etiology, and developing trend of fake news. Through symptoms diagnosis, the study contributes more categories to the previous typology of fake news: “click-bait,” “alarmist talk,” “subjective assumption,” “user-generated content (UGC)-news,” “hearsay,” and “incorrect-data news”. Etiology analysis shows that Chinese fake news is mainly about social life partially because of no previous tradition of verifying daily statements from politicians. Trend predictions reveal that online media, hearsay, and social life-related news of unverified single sources are the main problems which are different from the West and require special attention in the future. The proposed solution for the Chinese press and media outlets is to cooperate with internet platforms and establish a comprehensive fact-checking mechanism, integrating professional journalism, data and visualization technology, specialized knowledge, and communication efficiency.
Acknowledgements
An early version of the article was presented at the IAMCR 2019 Post-conference, Journalism: Critical issues in media ethics, in Barcelona, Spain. We thank Teresa Nicolás Gavilán for very helpful comments at the conference. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).