ABSTRACT
This paper argues that there is greater international policy coordination capacity in Asia than commonly acknowledged in claims about strong mutual assertions and recognition of national sovereignty. The paper dissects the notion of ‘weak institutions’ at the international level by developing conceptually an argument about relationships between formal and informal institutions. The argument is then illustrated by cases drawn from public health policy coordination in Asia. A brief concluding section highlights the relationship between formal and informal institutions as critical to investigations of the strength of different modes of international policy coordination in Asia.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Adrian Kay
Adrian Kay is at the Institute of Policy Studies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam as well as Professor of Government at the Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University. His research interests are in comparative and international public policy.