When ‘chemo is failing’ … ‘the illness is indigenous’. Therapeutic pluralism and reclaiming agency: family cancer caregivers’ experiences in Nairobi

ABSTRACT

This article explores therapeutic pluralism as a reclaiming of lay agency through (a) reframing illness and (b) generating options, in the context of palliative cancer care in urban Nairobi. Utilizing an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach as a framework, data were drawn from individual interviews and focus group discussions with a total of 20 family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in Nairobi Kenya. Findings show that therapeutic pluralism was largely collective – (family and community focused), rather than individual – (primary caregiver or patient) focused. Decisions on therapy choices were influenced by socio-cultural understandings of cancer propagated informally through family and community networks. Therapeutic pluralism in this context marks a reclaiming of agency as lay caregivers, family and community members collectively got involved in caring for ill members by sourcing for available therapeutic resources. Three implications for public health and specifically palliative healthcare interventions follow from the findings: (a) the need for a shift from patient-centred approaches to family and community inclusive approaches that encapsulate communities of care; (b)a recognition of the idea of cancer as a communal concern and (c) a call for engagement and knowledge exchange between healthcare professionals, cancer patients, family and community members about therapeutic pluralism and the necessity of addressing the current dichotomy between mainline professionals in healthcare institutions and traditional healers in light of the reality that both play key roles in primary healthcare.

KEYWORDS:

• Therapeutic pluralism
• family cancer caregivers
• palliative care
• Nairobi

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

ORCID

Jennifer Nyawira Githaiga http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-9393

Notes

1. Lingwood et al., “Challenge of Cancer Control,” 398.

2. WHO, “Kenya.”

3. Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation and Ministry of Medical Services, “National Cancer Control Strategy,” 9.

4. Musibi, “Cancer in Kenya,” 46; Othieno Abinya and Githanga, “Partner Profile,” 18–19.

5. Parliamentary Service Commission, “Republic of Kenya,” 9.

6. Chuma and Okungu, “Viewing the Kenyan Health System,” 5.

7. Kubania, “New Cancer Machine,” Daily Nation, March 21, 2015.

8. Kairu, “The Lord or the Doctor.”

9. Kimani, “Unsystematic Alternative,” 333–4; Patinkin, “Treating Diseases.”

10. Cocks and Dold, “Role of African Chemists,”1505–15; Jennings, “Chinese Medicine,”457–73; O’Brien, Soliman and Annan, “Traditional Medicine,” 573–9.

11. Jennings, “Chinese Medicine,” 457–73; Wendland, “Animating Biomedicine’s Moral Order,” 755–88.

12. Cocks and Dold, “Role of African Chemists,” 1505–15; O’Brien, Soliman, and Annan, “Traditional Medicine,” 573–9.

13. Kigen et al., “Current Trends,” 32–7; Patinkin, “Treating Diseases.”

14. Merriam and Muhamad, “Roles Traditional Healers,” 3593–601; Sered and Agigian, “Holistic Sickening: Breast Cancer,” 616–31.

15. Correa-Velez, Clavarino, and Eastwood, “Surviving, Relieving, Repairing,” 953–61; Klawiter, “Breast Cancer,” 845–74; Weeks et al., “Decision-Making,” e54–e66.

16. Broom and Tovey, “Therapeutic Pluralism?” 551–69; Kozak et al., “Use of Complementary,” 463–8.

17. Broom and Tovey, “Therapeutic Pluralism?” 551–69; Correa-Velez, Clavarino, and Eastwood, “Surviving, Relieving, Repairing,” 953–61; Kozak et al., “Use of Complementary,” 463–8.

18. Matsheta and Mulaudzi, “Perceptions of Traditional Healers,” 103–16; Merriam and Muhamad, “Roles Traditional Healers,” 3593–601; O’Brien, Soliman and Annan, “Traditional Medicine,” 573–9.

19. Mulemi, “Patients’ Perspectives on Hospitalisation,” 127–8; Sundal, “Not in My Hospital,” 581–2.

20. Oketch, “Researchers Concerned.”

21. Kigen et al., “Current Trends,” 33.

22. Patinkin, “Treating Diseases.”

23. Masquelier, Medicine: Folk Medicine, 250–1; Mulemi, Medicine: Indigenous Therapeutic Systems, 251–4; Yoder, “Knowledge of Illness,” 237–45.

24. Ibid.

25. Langwick, Alternative Materialities, 153–8.

26. Yoder, “Knowledge of Illness,” 237–45.

27. Bond, Ancestors and Witches, 131–57; Kenyatta, Facing Mount Kenya, 291.

28. Gade, “Historical Development,” 303–29.

29. Haegert, “An African Ethic,” 492–502; Metz and Gaie, “African Ethic of Ubuntu,” 273–90; Murithi, “African Perspective,” 221–33.

30. Kamwangamalu, “Ubuntu in South Africa”; Van Binsbergen, “Ubuntu.”

31. Mnyaka and Mothlabi, “African Concept of Ubuntu,” 228.

32. Powell and Hunt, “Family Care Giving,” 13–21; Streid et al., “Stressors and Resources,” 317–28.

33. Langwick, Geographies of Medicine, 143–65; Mburu, “Socio-Political Imperatives,” 521–7.

34. Olenja, “Assessing Community Attitude,” 187–99.

35. Smith, “Evaluating the Contribution,” 9.

36. Smith, Flowers, and Larkin, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, 29.

37. Shinebourne, “The Theoretical Underpinnings,” 17.

38. Ashworth, Conceptual Foundations, 4–25.

39. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry, 128.

40. Ae-Ngibise et al., “Experience of Caregivers”; Akintola, “Gendered Home-Based Care,” 237–47; Kipp et al., “Family Caregivers,” 856–71.

41. Tarimo et al., “Gender Roles,” 61–8; Yusuf, Adamu, and Nuhu, “Caregiver Burden,” 902–5.

42. Aga, Kylma, and Nikkonen, “Conceptions of Care,” 37–50; Kipp et al., “Family Caregivers,” 856–71; Tarimo et al., “Gender Roles,” 61–8.

43. Krueger and Casey, Focus Groups, 6–7; McLafferty, “Focus Group Interviews,” 190.

44. Richardson and St. Pierre, Writing: Method of Inquiry, 963.

45. Smith, Flowers, and Larkin, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, 56–78.

46. Githaiga, “Methodological Considerations,” 400–19.

47. Githaiga, An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, 61–2.

48. Larkin, Watts, and Clifton, “Giving Voice,” 102–20; Smith, Flowers, and Larkin, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, 79–108.

49. Ciekawy, Utsai as Ethical Discourse, 158–89.

50. Ibid.

51. Ibid.

52. Grant et al., “A Good Death,” 161.

53. Ibid., 160.

54. See note 23 above.

55. Mani et al., “Curcumin,” 29–43; Merrell et al., “Curcumin Loaded,” 1146–59.

56. Senft et al., “Non-toxic Compound Curcumin,” 491–8.

57. Livingston, Improvising Medicine, 53.

58. Mulemi, Medicine: Indigenous Therapeutic Systems, 251–4; Sabuni, “Dilemma,” 1280–91.

59. Doran, “Reconstructing Mchape ’95,” 397–416; Masquelier, Medicine: Folk Medicine, 250–1; Sabuni, “Dilemma,” 1280–91.

60. Broom and Doron, “Traditional Medicines, Collective Negotiation,” 54–65.

61. Tovey and Broom, “Cancer Patients’ Negotiation,” 652–62.

62. Farooqui et al., “Complementary and Alternative Medicines.”

63. Broom and Tovey, “Therapeutic Pluralism?” 551–69; Mohammed et al., “Conflicted Dying”; Correa-Velez, Clavarino, and Eastwood, “Surviving, Relieving, Repairing,” 953–61.

64. McClean, “Illness,” 628–48; Willig, “Cancer Diagnosis,” 897–903.

65. Mohammed et al., “Conflicted Dying.”

66. Mnyaka and Mothlabi, “African Concept of Ubuntu,” 223–4.