ABSTRACT
The paper analyzes the rhetoric of the smart city (SC) concept in order to recognize, categorize, and describe different perspectives of understanding the notion. Four approaches to the SC concept were isolated: three affirmative, and one rejecting. The approaches present a different understanding of the SC and indicate different elements creating urban ‘smartness.’ Despite differences, there is one common goal in every affirmative approach: to improve the quality of urban life. It is achieved through activities covering five dimensions distinguished within affirmative approaches. Together they can serve, i.e.,as a framework for SC case study analyses.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Dr. Alison Post and Dr. Wojciech Opioła, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their valuable insight and feedback on the paper. I am indebted to professors Marek Chyliński, Kamil Minkner, and Mark Whitaker for their input into my research on the smart city concept.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.