Abstract
This study examines the cover designs of popular works of eco-dystopian speculative fiction, documenting how graphic designers and commercial illustrators have conceptualized the impact of human behaviors on the near-future environment. The sample includes one hundred and five covers for ten high-impact, mass-market novels written between 1962 and 2013. Coded for thematic similarities, the sample reveals visual strategies and narrative tropes that have recurred since the advent of contemporary eco-dystopian fiction in the 1960s. Yet evolving social and environmental conditions render the specific visual motifs more journalistic than anticipatory. Reconceptualizing eco-dystopia through the meta-language of design failure, however, can be a way to suggest both genre-specific continuity and emergent concerns.
Notes
Notes
1 Frank R. Paul’s “The Moon Doom” for the pulp magazine Wonder Stories (May 1933) shows a tidal wave sweeping away Manhattan, as does Robert Stanley’s illustration for Dell’s paperback edition of When Worlds Collide (1952); E. Moritz depicts a flooded Egyptian Valley of the Kings for Fantastic Universe (July 1956).
2 To code the one hundred and five unique designs used on the covers of these ten novels, the images were first grouped with regard to the physical objects depicted in them (e.g., plants, animals, buildings, machines, human beings, etc.). Within these groupings, the images were further grouped by the conceptual significance of their primary subject matter relative to the novel’s plot, i.e., what the physical object is intended to signify. This process revealed four primary types of aesthetic experiences, or visually engaging cognitive tools for making sense of the idea of eco-dystopia: failed urban infrastructure, the return to nature, failed interactions between biology or genetics and design, and the presence or absence of individual human identity. Only nine covers, most of them entirely typographic, did not fall into one of these four subject-matter categories.
3 For scholarly treatments of the specifically eco-dystopic aspects of Atwood, see Bone (Citation2016), Bouson (Citation2016), Canavan (Citation2012), Changizi and Ghasemi (Citation2017), Copley (Citation2013), Dunlap (Citation2013), Labudova (Citation2013), and Northover (Citation2016). For Bacigalupi, see Donnelly (Citation2014), Hageman (Citation2012), and Selisker (Citation2015). For Ballard, see Firsching (Citation1985), Gandy (Citation2006), Rossi (Citation1994), and Tait (Citation2014). For Brunner, see Goldman (Citation1978), Hutchinson (Citation2008), Murphy (Citation1987), Smith (Citation2012), and Stern (Citation1976). For Butler, see Baccolini (Citation2000), Helford (Citation2002), Johns (Citation2010), Miller (Citation1998), Moylan (Citation2000), 223–45, Stillman (Citation2003), Warfield (Citation2005), and Zaki (Citation1990). For Harrison, see Ireland (Citation2013). And for Turner, see Milner (Citation2009) and Morgan (Citation2014).
Bouson, J. Brooks. 2016. “A ‘Joke-Filled Romp’ through End Times: Radical Environmentalism, Deep Ecology, and Human Extinction in Margaret Atwood’s Eco-Apocalyptic MaddAddam Trilogy.” Journal of Commonwealth Literature 51 (3): 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989415573558. Canavan, Gerry. 2012. “Hope, But Not for Us: Ecological Science Fiction and the End of the World in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood.” LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory 23 (2): 138–159. Changizi, Parisa, and Parvin Ghasemi. 2017. “Humanity Cast as the Other in the Tragedy of Life: An Ecocritical Reading of Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing, The Handmaid’s Tale and MaddAddam Trilogy.” Journal of Humanistic & Social Studies 8 (1): 55–73. Copley, Soraya. 2013. “Rereading Marge Piercy and Margaret Atwood: Eco-Feminist Perspectives on Nature and Technology.” Critical Survey 25 (2): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2013.250204. Dunlap, Allison. 2013. “Eco-Dystopia: Reproduction and Destruction in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Journal of Ecocriticism 5 (1): 1–15. Labudova, Katarina. 2013. “Paradice Redesigned: Post-Apocalyptic Visions of Urban and Rural Spaces in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy.” Eger Journal of English Studies 13: 27–36. Donnelly, Sean. 2014. “Peak Oil Imagining in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road and Paolo Bacigalupi’s The Windup Girl.” English Academy Review 31 (2): 156–169. Selisker, Scott. 2015. “‘Stutter-Stop Flash-Bulb Strange’: GMOs and the Aesthetics of Scale in Paolo Bacigalupi’s The Windup Girl.” Science Fiction Studies 42 (3): 500–518. Firsching, Lorenz J. 1985. “J. G. Ballard’s Ambiguous Apocalypse.” Science Fiction Studies 12 (3): 297–310. Rossi, Umberto. 1994. “Images from the Disaster Area: An Apocalyptic Reading of Urban Landscapes in Ballard’s The Drowned World and Hello America.” Science Fiction Studies 21 (1): 81–97. Tait, Adrian. 2014. “Nature Reclaims Her Own: J. G. Ballard’s The Drowned World.” Australian Humanities Review 57: 21–37. Goldman, Stephen H. 1978. “John Brunner’s Dystopias: Heroic Man in Unheroic Society.” Science Fiction Studies 5 (3): 260–270. Hutchinson, Richard. 2008. “The Ecological Apocalypse of 1972: Science and Social Movements in John Brunner’s The Sheep Look Up.” POMPA: Publications of the Mississippi Philological Association, 84–94. Murphy, Patrick D. 1987. “Dialogics and Didacticism: John Brunner’s Narrative Blending.” Science Fiction Studies 14 (1): 21–33. Smith, Jad. 2012. John Brunner. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Stern, Michael. 1976. “From Technique to Critique: Knowledge and Human Interests in John Brunner’s Stand on Zanzibar, The Jagged Orbit, and The Sheep Look Up.” Science Fiction Studies 3 (2): 112–130. Baccolini, Raffaella. 2000. “Gender and Genre in the Feminist Critical Dystopias of Katharine Burdekin, Margaret Atwood, and Octavia Butler.” In Future Females, The Next Generation: New Voices and Velocities in Feminist Science Fiction Criticism, by Marleen S. Barr, 13–34. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Helford, Elyce Rae. 2002. “(E)Raced Visions: Women of Color and Science Fiction in the United States.” In Science Fiction, Canonization, Marginalization, and the Academy, edited by Gary Westfahl and George Edgar Slusser, 127–138. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Miller, Jim. 1998. “Post-Apocalyptic Hoping: Octavia Butler’s Dystopian/Utopian Vision.” Science Fiction Studies 25 (2): 336–360. Moylan, Tom. 2000. Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Stillman, Peter G. 2003. “Dystopian Critiques, Utopian Possibilities, and Human Purposes in Octavia Butler’s Parables.” Utopian Studies 14 (1): 15–35. Warfield, Angela. 2005. “Reassessing the Utopian Novel: Octavia Butler, Jacques Derrida, and the Impossible Future of Utopia.” Obsidian III 6–7 (2–1): 61–71. Zaki, Hoda M. 1990. “Utopia, Dystopia, and Ideology in the Science Fiction of Octavia Butler.” Science Fiction Studies 17 (2): 239–251. Ireland, Brian. 2013. “‘The Wretched Refuse of Your Teeming Shore’: Overpopulation and Social Breakdown in Harry Harrison’s Make Room! Make Room!” In Critical Insights: Dystopia, edited by M. Keith Booker, 142–159. Ipswich, MA: Salem Press. Morgan, Ruth A. 2014. “Imagining a Greenhouse Future: Scientific and Literary Depictions of Climate Change in 1980s Australia.” Australian Humanities Review 57: 38–55. Additional information
Notes on contributors
Dori Griffin
Dori Griffin is an assistant professor in the School of Art + Design at Ohio University, where she teaches graphic design and design history. Her research centers around the rhetorical significance of popular visual culture in the twentieth century, particularly in relation to graphic design and commercial illustration. Her first book, Mapping Wonderlands, was published by the University of Arizona Press in 2013. Presently, she is at work on a book manuscript that provides a visual history of the type specimen as both a form and a professional practice; this research emerges from a 2015 fellowship at the Cary Graphic Arts Collection at the Rochester Institute of Technology. [email protected]