![Sample our Museum and Heritage Studies journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5945/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Museum-Heritage-Studies.jpg"})
Abstract
Written as a response to Seo Seongrok’s criticism of Minjung misul and its theory of social realism, this article warns of the danger of postmodernism from the West, especially its call for deconstruction of subject and its denial of social totality. The author believes that such attitudes can result in anarchism, extreme individualism, and even nihilism. The author defends social realism by arguing that questions of forms, styles, and art medium remain secondary to the grand principle of the independent development of national art for the Minjung misul (people’s art) movement.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Shim Kwang-Hyun
Translated from Korean by Namin Kim
Originally published as “Talmodeonjuuijaui jungseongjeong ideollogi” in Wolganmisool (November 1989): 59–62.