144
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Croatian and Serbian private forest owners’ perceptions of energy wood mobilization: survey results and relevance for future bioeconomy

, &
Pages 515-525 | Received 30 Dec 2015, Accepted 11 Mar 2016, Published online: 28 Apr 2016
 

ABSTRACT

In recent years, new policies have emerged in Europe related to both bioenergy and bioeconomy. The study investigated perceptions of the Croatian and Serbian non-industrial private forest owners (NIPFs) concerning energy wood mobilization from forests owned by them. A total of 232 NIPFs from the two countries participated in the study. The NIPFs perceived that they did not have adequate knowledge of selling energy wood, its price, and energy wood entrepreneurship. According to the NIPFs, the most significant obstacle to mobilizing energy wood from private forests was the lack of proper forest roads in their countries. Among the economic instruments, the NIPFs favored subsidies and guaranteed market over tax reduction for mobilizing energy wood and establishing energy wood entrepreneurship. Their main motivation for energy wood production appeared to be expected income from such an activity. It also appeared that the NIPFs would prefer supplying energy biomass from new plantations and harvesting residues instead of using their existing forests. The study provided a number of recommendations for the policy makers in Croatia and Serbia on improving the preconditions for energy wood mobilization from private forests and linking it with the bioeconomy by addressing the issues related to policy, infrastructure, and market development.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions, which helped to improve the manuscript. The authors acknowledge all the survey respondents in Croatia and Serbia for their cooperation in this study. Special thanks to Miljenko Zupanić from the Croatian Union of Private Forest Owners’ Associations. In addition, E.P. thanks the Croatian Science Foundation project EFFEctivity (HRZZ-11-2013-2492) for supporting him in this study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Funding

Funding support was received from the project RoK-FOR-Sustainable forest management providing renewable energy, sustainable construction and bio-based products (Project No. 245437) under the EU 7th Framework Programme.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 427.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.