Analysis of drug use in institutionalized individuals with intellectual disability and tube feeding

Abstract

Objectives: Little is known about the medication used by people with intellectual disabilities (ID) and enteral feeding tube (EFT). However, in light of the complexity associated with drug administration through EFT, data on medication use in this population may be helpful in the development of practical guidelines and staff training initiatives.

Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in six Belgian residential care facilities (RCFs) for individuals with ID. Anonymized medication records of all residents receiving chronic medication through EFT were collected (n = 156). All chronic drugs were categorized according to the ATC classification, and medication records were checked for potential major drug–drug interactions (DDI).

Results: The 156 residents used a total of 1029 chronic drugs via EFT, with a median of six drugs per resident (range 1–14). A total of 148 different drug molecules were identified, belonging to 38 main ATC therapeutic groups (ATC level 2). Antiepileptics, drugs for constipation and drugs for acid-related disorders were the most frequently used groups. Seventy-four of the 156 screened medication records (47%) contained at least one potential DDI; in total, 116 potential interactions were identified, which represent 38 different interacting drug pairs.

Conclusion: This study describes medication use through EFT among people with ID in Belgian RCFs, with antiepileptics being the most frequently used group. Our study also demonstrated that a high number of drugs is administered through EFT, and that the number of potential DDIs is high. These observations warrant an increased attention for drug administration through the EFT in individuals with ID.

Keywords:

• Drug use
• Enteral feeding tube
• Intellectual disability
• Residential care facility
• Medication administration
• Drug interaction

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participating residential care facilities.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This study was funded by Ghent University.