1,484
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Activated crystalline silicon dioxide mitigates weight loss in lactating sows

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 123-128 | Received 02 Jun 2021, Accepted 14 Dec 2021, Published online: 29 Dec 2021

Abstract

This study investigated activated crystalline silicon dioxide (SIL) supplementation in late pregnancy and lactating sows on reproductive parameters as well as the performance of suckling piglets. Eighty sows were assigned to two groups: control (CON, n = 40), and activated crystalline SIL (n = 40). Both treatments received identical basal diets, without (CON), or with 0.3 kg of activated SIL/ton at day 111 of pregnancy up to day 21 of lactation. The sows were evaluated at day110 of gestation and at day 21 of lactation for individual body weight (BW), backfat (BF), average daily feed intake (ADFI), percentage of BW and BF loss, and milk production. The litter was evaluated for size and BW at birth, and at 21 d old, likewise the preweaning survival percentage. At day 21 lactation, the SIL sows were 2.39% heavier than the CON group. The sows also had an increase of 5.05% in milk yield compared to the CON sows. In addition, SIL sows showed lower weight loss compared to CON sows. The weaned piglets from SIL sows had an increase of 4.43% in BW compared to CON sows. In conclusion, supplementation of 0.03% of activated crystalline SIL applied to late pregnancy, and to lactating sows reduced weight loss and marginally improved the milk yield and BW of piglets at weaning.

    Highlights

  • The activated crystalline silicon dioxide (SIL) in diets from late pregnancy to lactation reduced body weight loss of sows.

  • Sows that received activated crystalline SIL in late pregnancy and lactating period trended to improve the milk yield in 5.05%.

  • The piglets from sows fed activated crystalline SIL tended to enhance 4.43% in body weight at 21-d old.

Introduction

Modern sows develop catabolism during lactation due to the high tissue mobilisation associated with an insufficient feed intake (Kim and Easter Citation2001; Langendijk et al. Citation2016). Catabolism harmful effects are impaired to reproductive lifetime, milk production and litter weight gain (Costermans et al. Citation2020). Thus, the strategies to optimise milk production and litter growth in modern sows have been studied, focussing on female body condition at gestation or feed intake during lactation (Schenkel et al. Citation2010; Eckhardt et al. Citation2013; Mallmann et al. Citation2018; Costermans et al. Citation2020).

Silicon dioxide (SIL) is a mineral found in several clays and diatomaceous earth, commonly used as a feed additive due to the amorphous molecular structure that can absorb humidity and toxins (Zhu et al. Citation2016). The crystalline SIL can be activated through an electromagnetic treatment (Decaux Citation2017), then retain and transfer electromagnetic energy to an aqueous solution. This activated silica can increase the water electronegativity inside the gut and accelerate biochemical changes in the digestive tract, such as enzymatic digestion and nutrient transfer across cells (Decaux Citation2016; Citation2017).

The cation exchange and absorption properties of silica, such as increasing feed retention time and decreasing intestinal emptying rates, improve nutrient absorption and feed efficiency in poultry (Safaeikatouli et al. Citation2012; Faryadi and Sheikhahmadi Citation2017), improve average daily gain and feed conversion ratio in turkeys (Tran et al. Citation2015), increase egg weight in quails (Faryadi and Sheikhahmadi Citation2017), and improve growth performance in broilers (Maradon et al. Citation2017) and weaned piglets (Martel-Kennes et al. Citation2016). On the other hand, studies on activated SIL in broilers (Anshory et al. Citation2017) and turkeys (Majewska et al. Citation2009) have shown no improvement in growth performance. In addition, the productive parameters and follicular characteristics did not improve in quails when provided isolated (Ratriyanto et al. Citation2021).

Most studies on activated crystalline SIL have been carried out in poultry, and little is known about the effects in pigs, especially in pregnant and lactating sows. Therefore, this project considered that sows fed with activated crystalline SIL could mitigate the weight loss during the lactation and wean heavier pigs. Thus, this study evaluated the effects on reproductive parameters, milk yield and suckling piglets’ performance of sows fed diets with supplementation of activated crystalline SIL, from late gestation until the end of the lactation period.

Material and methods

The trial was carried out in a Commercial Swine Farm, in Leme, Sao Paulo, Brazil. The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, in University of Sao Paulo, approved the experimental protocol on Animal Use.

Experimental design

Eighty commercial hybrid sows from third to sixth parity (C23, Agroceres PIC®, Rio Claro, Brazil) were grouped in two treatments. The control group (CON, n = 40), sows fed basal diets, and SIL group, sows fed basal diets added 0.3 kg/ton of activated crystalline SIL (n = 40, Silica+®, Ceresco Nutrition, Montreal, Canada). The SIL was provided for sows via top-dressing, from day 111 of pregnancy to day 21 of lactation. Diets were formulated according to nutritional requirements (Rostagno et al. Citation2017).

Animal management

Two rooms were used for this experiment. The sows were allocated in individual pens, including 40 crates (2.20 × 1.68 m) with plastic floor, following sanitary procedures as commercial farms, with nipples and semi-automatic feeders. Approximately 3 d before farrowing, all pregnant sows were transferred to individual farrowing crates. The pattern for the litter size was established until the second day after farrowing, performed using sows of same treatment. Routine procedures (tail docking, ear notching and iron injection) were conducted two days after farrowing. At 5 d old, the males were surgically castrated, and no creep feed was offered for piglets.

Diets

The daily diet was based on corn and soybean meal (Table ), regulated according to Body condtiton score (BCS). All sows received 1 kg of feed per day, from 90 d of pregnancy until farrowing. Moreover, 2.3 kg of lactation diet was provided once per sow on the farrowing day. On the first and second days after farrowing, 4.6 kg of the diet was provided once per sow. From the 3rd day to the 21st day (weaning), sows were fed ad libitum using the lactation diet. Water was provided ad libitum during gestation and lactation.

Table 1. Ingredients of pre-partum and lactation diets (as-fed basis).

Sows’ performance and milk production

At days 110 of gestation and 21 of lactation, the sows were individually weighed. Backfat (BF) was measured by ultrasound Scanning 100® (5-MHz transducers, Pie Medical, Philipsweg, Belgium) at P2 position for body weight (BW). Average daily feed intake (ADFI) was evaluated in the overall lactation period, and the percentage of BW loss was assessed from these data (Eckhardt et al. Citation2013). Milk yield was estimated considering the need of 4 kg of breast milk to every 1 kg of litter weight gain, according to Close and Cole (Citation2001). Milk from 20 sows of each treatment was collected on the 10th day of lactation for protein, fat, lactose and solids-not-fat content analyses. The samples were analysed using an automatic milk analyser (Lactoscan MCC, Nova Zagora, Bulgaria).

Piglets’ performance

The number of born alive and weaned piglets was evaluated in the treatments. The animals were individually weighed using digital electronic scales at birth and at 21 d old (weaning). Furthermore, the preweaning survival percentage was calculated as described by the equation below: [(number piglets weaned ÷number piglets born alive after transfer) ×100]

Statistical analysis

According to a randomised design, data were analysed using the TTEST procedure of SAS software (2010) (Statistical Analysis System version 9.3, SAS Inc., Cary, NC). The sows from third to sixth parity were allotted to two treatments. Each group received a similar number of sows by parity and each animal was considered as one experimental unit. Outliers were identified as an absolute Studentized residual value of 3 or greater. The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was applied to compare the mean difference between the two treatments by using the NPAR1WAY procedure at the point the distribution for a t-test assumed non-normality. Effects were considered significant to p<.05, and as a trend when p<.10.

Results and discussion

In this study, the BF at day 110 of pregnancy and weaning, BF loss and the ADFI during the overall lactation period were similar between the CON and SIL sow groups (Table ). At day 21 of lactation, SIL sows were 2.39% slightly heavier (p=.078), and presented reduced weight loss compared to the CON group (7.34 vs. 9.33%, respectively, p<.05, Table ). In addition, sows fed SIL had a little increase of 5.05% in milk yield compared to the CON sow (p=.085, Table ). The milk quality (fat, density, solids-not-fat, protein and lactose) was similar between the treatments (Table ), as well as the number of piglets born alive, weaned piglets, BW at birth and preweaning survival percentage (Table ). At weaning, the piglets from SIL sows had a minimal increase of 4.43% in BW compared to CON sows (p=.060, Table ).

Table 2. Reproductive performance of sows fed diets with or without activated crystalline silicon dioxide supplementation.

Table 3. Milk quality of sows fed diets with or without activated crystalline silicon dioxide supplementation.

Table 4. Performance of pigs born from sows fed diets with or without activated crystalline silicon dioxide supplementation.

According to the previous analysis, no researches have been published about the use of SIL in pregnant and lactating sows or the effects on progeny. The supplementation of 0.02% of SIL for pigs increases the feed intake, and growth rate and BW in weaned piglets (Martel-Kennes et al. Citation2016).

Most studies have been carried out on poultry. Supplementation of 0.02% of SIL in turkey diets improves the average daily gain and feed conversion ratio, reduces pH and decreases ammonium conversion to ammonia (Tran et al. Citation2015). Furthermore, the nutrient absorption, feed efficiency and egg weight is enhanced in quails (Faryadi and Sheikhahmadi Citation2017) and broilers. Likewise, growth performance is improved (Maradon et al. Citation2017) and nutrient availability and fat retention are increased, without negative effect on growth performance (Anshory et al. Citation2017). Further, a recent study on tilapia shows the increase in growth performance and the utilisation of SIL in feed (Bashar et al. Citation2021).

At the end of the lactation period, the SIL sows had reduced weight loss and tended to increase milk yield despite not changing feed intake. The piglet weaning weight was higher, suggesting the nutrients have been better absorbed by the sow. Though the digestibility assay has not been measured in this study, some other studies have reported that activated silica increases the digestibility and absorption of nutrients, including proteins and lipids (Bashar et al. Citation2021). The water inside the gut, essential for homeostasis, has the molecules activated in the presence of activated SIL. Then, these activated molecules as nucleophiles can act on the peptide carbonyl group of the ingested protein, break down into small peptides and free amino acids. Activated water molecules may also regenerate the enzymes, enabling them to work again within the shortest possible time (Berg et al. Citation2002). Furthermore, the activated silica can temporarily connect to nutrients reducing the gastrointestinal passage rate allowing the nutrients to be exposed to digestion for more extended (Safaeikatouli et al. Citation2012).

The impairment in current lactation and subsequent reproductive performance (Thaker and Bilkei Citation2005; Koketsu et al. Citation2017), and litter weight gain can be observed (Costermans et al. Citation2020) when weight loss exceeds 10% during the lactation. Some researches have been developed to mitigate lactational catabolism from strategies related to body condition and feed intake (Mallmann et al. Citation2018; Costermans et al. Citation2020), but with no consistent effectiveness. The activated SIL can mitigate the harmful effects as mentioned before, but using other nutritional strategies during this period is not very common.

The milk yield increased 5.05%, and probably collaborated on the raise in piglet weight at weaning, despite the SIL sow had no difference in milk quality. More studies are still required. The weight at weaning is essential in commercial swine farm and can influence the market weight (Wolter and Ellis 2002 Cabrera et al. Citation2010; Middelkoop et al. Citation2019; Martins et al. Citation2020). The factors include sow body condition, parity, feed intake during pregnancy, and the influence of milk yield (Eckhardt et al. Citation2013; Martins et al. Citation2020).

Feeding strategies for sows in late gestation or during lactation are essential and interfere in the BCS and milk yield, improving BW litter at birth and weaning. Besides, this management can also mitigate the effects on the subsequent reproductive performance. Activated SIL has been shown to improve performance, feed efficiency, increase nutrient digestibility and absorption, and egg quality in birds. However, further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms by which these effects occur.

Conclusion

In conclusion, supplementation of 0.03% of activated crystalline SIL in late gestation and lactation sows reduced weight loss and marginally improved the milk yield and BW of piglets at weaning. However, further research is required to better define the position of activated crystalline SIL regarding the molecular and physiological prospects.

Ethical approval

The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of Sao Paulo.

Author contributions

L. A. Vitagliano: Conceptualisation and investigation; Y. Sartore and C. A. Granghelli: Investigation and writing- original draft; R. S. B. Carvalho, M. L. P. Tse and S. M. M. K. Martins: formal analysis, and writing – review and editing; C. Decaux and F. T. Jansen: Conceptualisation, funding acquisition, writing – review and editing; L.F. Araújo and CSS. Araújo: Conceptualisation, funding acquisition, project administration, writing – review, and editing.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank the commercial farm for providing experimental animals and their assistance in animal handling throughout the experimental period.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data availability statement

Data availability statement The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [LFA], upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

Ceresco Nutrition financed this research.

References

  • Anshory I, Sumiati S, Wijayanti I. 2017. Evaluation of silica + supplementation in different types of diet on performance, nutrient retention and the economic value of broilers diet. Bull Anim Sci. 41(4):461–471.
  • Bashar A, Hasan NA, Haque MM, Rohani MF, Hossain S. 2021. Effects of dietary silica nanoparticle on growth performance, protein digestibility, hematology, digestive morphology, and muscle composition of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis Niloticus. Front Mar Sci. 8:706179.
  • Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. 2002. Biochemistry. Proteases: facilitating a difficult reaction. 5th ed. New York (NY): W H Freeman.
  • Cabrera RA, Boyd RD, Jungst SB, Wilson ER, Johnston ME, Vignes JL, Odle J. 2010. Impact of lactation length and piglet weaning weight on long-term growth and viability of progeny. J Anim Sci. 88(7):2265–2276.
  • Close WH, Cole DJA. 2001. Nutrition of sows and boars. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
  • Costermans NGL, Soede NM, Middelkoop A, Laurenssen BFA, Koopmanschap RE, Zak LJ, Knol EF, Keijer J, Teerds KJ, Kemp B. 2020. Influence of the metabolic state during lactation on milk production in modern sows. Animal. 14(12):2543–2553.
  • Decaux C. 2016. Electromagnetic technology: a new gut health approach. Gut Health. p. 1–4. [accessed 2019 Sep 3]. https://ceresconutrition.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AAF-Gut-Health-Special.pdf.
  • Decaux C. 2017. Activated silicon dioxide to achieve a synergistic effect in pigs. International Pig Topics. [accessed 2019 Sep 3]. http://positiveaction.info/pdfs/articles/pt32_1p25.pdf.
  • Eckhardt OHO, Horta FC, Parazzi LJ, Afonso ER, Martins SMMK, Santo TAD, Barros FR, Freitas JE, Jr Rennó FP, Visintin JA, et al. 2013. Differences in the maternal plane of nutrition and body condition during late gestation coupled with estrus synchronization at weaning do not result in differences in embryonic development at 4 days of gestation. J Anim Sci. 91(7):3436–3444.
  • Faryadi S, Sheikhahmadi A. 2017. Effect of nanosilicon dioxide on growth performance, egg quality, liver histopathology and concentration of calcium, phosphorus and silicon in egg, liver and bone in laying quails. Appl Nanosci. 7(8):765–772.
  • Kim SW, Easter RA. 2001. Nutrient mobilization from body tissues as influenced by litter size in lactating sows. J Anim Sci. 79(8):2179–2186.
  • Koketsu Y, Tani S, Ida R. 2017. Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds. Porcine Health Manag. 3(1):1–10.
  • Langendijk P, Chen TY, McIlfatrick SM, Nottle MB. 2016. Energy balance influences number of ovulation rather than embryo quality in the pig. Theriogenology. 86(4):1008–1013.
  • Majewska T, Mikulski D, Siwik T. 2009. Silica grit, charcoal and hardwood ash in Turkey nutrition. J Elem. 14(3):489–500.
  • Mallmann AL, Betiolo FB, Camilloti E, Mellagi APG, Ulguim RR, Wentz I, Bernardi ML, Gonçalves MAD, Kummer R, Bortolozzo FP. 2018. Two different feeding levels during late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impact on piglet birth weight and female reproductive performance. J Anim Sci. 96(10):4209–4219.
  • Maradon GG, Sumiati S, Mutia R, Winarsih W. 2017. Evaluation of using Silica+® as a feed additive on minerals metabolism, health status and excreta quality of broiler. Bull Anim Sci. 41(3):285–297.
  • Martel-Kennes Y, Lévesque J, Decaux C. 2016. Effect of crystalline silicon dioxide in piglet feed on growth performance with different levels of growth promoters. J Anim Sci. 94(5):479.
  • Martins SMMK, Ferrin MO, Poor AP, Campos GA, Torres MA, Weigel RA, Strefezzi RF, Andrade AFC. 2020. Gruel creep feed provided from 3 days of age did not affect the market weight of the sow’s catabolic state. Livest Sci. 231:103883.
  • Middelkoop A, Costermans NGJ, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE. 2019. Feed intake of the sow and playful creep feeding of piglets influence piglet behaviour and performance before and after weaning. Sci Rep. 9(1):16140.
  • Ratriyanto A, Prastowo S, Widyas N. 2021. The effect of activated silicon dioxide and betaine supplementation on quails’ growth and productivity. Vet World. 14(8):2009–2015.
  • Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Hannas MI, Donzele JL, Sakomura NK, Perazzo FG, Saraiva A, Teixeira ML, Rodrigues PB, Oliveira RF, et al. 2017. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; p. 416–426.
  • Safaeikatouli M, Boldaji F, Dastar B, Hassani S. 2012. The effect of dietary silicate minerals supplementation on apparent ileal digestibility of energy and protein in broiler chickens. Int J Agric Biol. 14(2):299–302.
  • Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 2010. SAS user’s guide, version 9.3. Cary (NC): SAS. Institute Inc.
  • Schenkel AC, Bernardi ML, Bortolozzo FP, Wentz I. 2010. Body reserve mobilization during lactation in first parity sows and its effect on second litter size. Livest Sci. 132(1–3):165–172.
  • Thaker MYC, Bilkei M. 2005. Lactation weight loss influences subsequent reproductive performance of sows. Anim Reprod Sci. 88(3–4):309–318.
  • Tran ST, Bowman ME, Smith TK. 2015. Effects of a silica-based feed supplement on performance, health, and litter quality of growing turkeys. Poult Sci. 94(8):1902–1908.
  • Wolter BF, Ellis M, Corrigan BP, DeDecker JM. 2002. The effect of birth weight and feeding of supplemental milk replacer to piglets during lactation on preweaning and post-weaning growth performance and carcass characteristics. J Anim Sci. 80(2):301–308.
  • Zhu Y, Hassan YI, Watts C, Zhou T. 2016. Innovative technologies for the mitigation of mycotoxins in animal feed and ingredients – a review of recent patents. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 216:19–29.