![Sample our Social Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110822/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Social-Sciences.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
This paper sets out to consider Brendon Tarrant in the context of New Zealand terrorism. While Tarrant’s attack on 15 March 2019 was unprecedented in terms of its scale, he was in many ways a somewhat typical New Zealand terrorist offender; alone, driven, difficult to detect and able to strike without warning. While Islamist inspired terrorism has been the predominant identified threat in recent years, the primacy of any particular threat historically did not blind New Zealand’s security sector to others, and various Right Wing extremist (RWE) risks had been identified, investigated and mitigated periodically since at least 1990. This study is based on an historical overview of terrorism in New Zealand, as well as interviews with security sector practitioners, who recalled their experiences of RWE risk. Those practitioners responsible for the detection and mitigation of terrorism risk in New Zealand genuinely seemed to sense that RWE risk was increasing, but were fettered in their abilities to counter it by the inconsistency it presented and a general, societal complacency about the risk of terrorism in New Zealand.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. RWE is used for both ‘Right Wing Extremism’ and ‘Right Wing Extremist’.
2. For a selection of articles relating to these points, see: Bennett (Citation2019); Ensor (Citation2019); Kerr (Citation2019); Kirkness (Citation2019); Manch (Citation2019); Duff (Citation2019); Harris (Citation2019); Tan (Citation2019); Stuff News (Citation2019) and Watkins (Citation2019).
3. Tarrant’s manifesto ‘The Great Replacement,’ (2019) is prohibited in New Zealand by the Chief Censor under the Film, Video and Publications Classifications Act 1996; it has been viewed by the author under exemption granted June 2019.