ABSTRACT
Marine parks are used worldwide as a marine governance tool to increase fish density and populations, protect rare and threatened species. However, MPAs are often contested and conflict emerges as a powerful factor in shaping their success or failure. This paper reports on a conflict analysis that investigated the role conflict played in affecting the community engagement processes and public acceptability of MPAs in South Australia. We demonstrate that, despite application of world recognised engagement techniques, conflict relating to MPAs persists. This conflict is powerful enough to provoke the dismantling of the MPAs upon a change of government. We argue that ongoing analysis of conflict, including the context, actors, causes and relational dynamics, enables a better understand the role of conflict within and during the community engagement processes. The insights gained may then help break the conflict treadmill to facilitate the conditions needed to apply successful MPA governance systems.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes on contributors
Catriona Meyer-McLean is a PhD candidate at The University of Adelaide, Geography, Environment and Population. Her research is exploring the influence of the anti-fracking discourses on mining policy development in Australia and the UK. She is interested in critical analysis of the complexities of community participation in natural resource development to improve policy outcomes.
Melissa Nursey-Bray is Associate Professor and Head of Department, Geography, Environment and Population. Her work considers the role communities splay in environmental decision making, and specifically the role of conflict, social learning, power and knowledge. She has many years’ experience working with Indigenous and fishing groups.
ORCID
Catriona Bride Meyer-McLean http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-1756