ABSTRACT
A growing body of research has demonstrated that neoliberal discourses have negatively impacted dual language bilingual education (DLBE) for students designated as English learners. This study uses the concept of expropriation to refer to the co-opting and dispossessing of educational resources, opportunities, and rights from language-minoritized communities, and a shift to the reframing and reuse of these resources by white English-privileged populations for their benefit. Using Utah’s DLBE model (fiftyfication, exclusion of one-teacher model, exclusion of one-way developmental bilingual education, and strict language separation policy) as a foundational expropriation reference, we evaluated which states followed this model, how they implemented it, what discourses were used, and who the beneficiaries were. Employing critical discourse analysis, we examined DLBE policy documents gathered from states’ websites across the U.S. and found that Delaware, Georgia, and Wyoming emulated Utah’s model. Findings showed discursive gentrification propelled by English-hegemonic and neoliberal forces, which benefited white English-privileged students. We posit further analyses should consider the intersection of other policies in the context of expropriation conditions.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 The term minoritized highlights the socially imposed “minority” status of individuals whose access to opportunities, resources, and power in society is marginalized due to race, language, citizenship status, etc., whether they are numerically in the minority or not.
2 The term designated English learner emphasizes an imposed label in the sometimes negative (Umansky, Citation2016) and erroneous classification (Umansky, Citation2017) of students who are learning or have learned English in the school system.