525
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Conducting a Formative Evaluation of an Intervention Promoting Mammography Screening in an American Indian Community: The Native Women’s Health Project

, , , , , & show all
Pages 52-65 | Received 11 Jun 2018, Accepted 10 Sep 2018, Published online: 31 Dec 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Breast cancer is an important public health issue among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. However, there are very few published studies describing the evaluation of breast health promotion programs among AI/AN women. Purpose: To describe the formative evaluation of a multicomponent intervention to promote mammography screening in an AI community in rural Oklahoma. Methods: A comprehensive process evaluation plan with emphasis on context, reach, dose received, dose delivered, and fidelity was developed. Data collection included mixed research methodology and impact was assessed via one group pre/post research design. Data analysis consisted of descriptive statistical analysis and content analysis. The study utilized a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. Results: Process evaluation revealed a relatively high reach within the priority population for both components (clinic and community) and a moderate implementation. Focus group research showed that participants were overall satisfied with program implementation. The intervention was feasible to implement in real-world settings. Translation to Health Education Practice: Community-based evaluation of breast health promotion programs among AI communities is challenging, because one has to balance methodological rigor with practical constraints. An evaluation plan, mixed methods, and a collaborative approach are useful tools in conducting the evaluation.

Acknowledgments

Our sincere gratitude goes out to the leadership of the particular American Indian tribe and its clinic administration for helping accommodate this project and to all of the women who participated in the study. We are also grateful to Drs. J. Neil Henderson and L.D. Carson and Vickie Canfield for their contribution to this study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Susan G. Komen®. Partial funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Grant 1 U54GM104938), and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (Grant R25MD011564). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the above funding sources.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 86.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.