960
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The “box”ing match: Narratives from queer adults growing up through the heterosexual matrix

Pages 93-117 | Received 03 Apr 2015, Accepted 26 Feb 2016, Published online: 13 Jan 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Using queer theories of sexuality and gender, this study centers on “coming out” stories of ten queer adults. Engaging Butler's heterosexual matrix (1990) as an analytic tool, stories are analyzed with respect to agency and positioning. Findings suggest that participants' positioning and agency were largely affected by gender identity and expression (i.e., inside or beyond the gender binary). Findings further suggest that the heterosexual matrix was a primary and troublesome framework for all participants as they navigated the complex process of becoming. This article argues that teachers must be supported to offer queer frameworks to create safe and affirming schools.

Notes

1. In this study, I engaged participants in self-reflections about their experiences “coming out.” While I use the expression “coming out,” I acknowledge the complicated, messy, nonlinear process therein and that it is ongoing and iterative; my intention is not to reify a binary of being “out” or being “closeted” (Sedgwick, Citation1993). Instead, I aim to call attention to how participants began to understand themselves, and in particular, how they understood who they were becoming with respect to their sexual identities; references to “identity development” should be considered queerly.

2. I use queer and LGBTQ interchangeably in an attempt to signify the existence of these categories, as well as the need to disrupt them, as they do not do justice to gender and sexual diversity more broadly.

3. I use the pronoun “their” as a gender-neutral singular pronoun here to disrupt discursive reproduction of binary sex categories.

4. Utah, Arizona, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and South Carolina continue to have laws that ban educators from including LGBTQ people and/ or history or that allow them to talk about queer identities in a positive light. Seems there may be some rethinking to do, given the fact that marriage equality now exists in the United States (i.e., How do “No Promo Homo” policies square with marriage equality?)

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Bethy Leonardi

Bethy Leonardi is a post-doctoral research associate in the University of Colorado Boulder's School of Education. She is co-founder and co-director of A Queer Endeavor, an initiative aiming to support educational communities to affirm gender and sexual diversity. Her research explores queer issues in educational foundations, policy, and practice

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 232.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.